PDA

View Full Version : Honda Integra VTIR 0-100km/h?



vteccoupe
19-03-2005, 08:09 PM
hi...do u guys noe watz the 0-100km/h timing for a vtir and also the quarter mile?

zco
19-03-2005, 08:31 PM
search in google. for the factory figure. usually differes from driver and technique

faijai
19-03-2005, 08:50 PM
get urself a gtech or rsm and find out :D

luzinit
19-03-2005, 09:36 PM
ruff guestimate. 7.8 0-100 and 15.5 1/4mile......

vteccoupe
19-03-2005, 11:26 PM
ruff guestimate. 7.8 0-100 and 15.5 1/4mile......

7.8 is nt bad..hw abt the civic vtir?around the same time as well?

luzinit
20-03-2005, 01:06 AM
yup, civic vtir about the same, cars are almost identical upto 100km/hr, theres not much in it.
i've gteched my car, has intake and catback, and got a best of 7.54, and my best time at the drag strip 15.13. so ur lookin around those sorta times! dont worry too much about the time tho, the cars really fun to drive, thats the important thing!

djgarv
20-03-2005, 02:22 AM
what about after 100kph?
nothing against civics...just curious. went driving with two civics last night...a hatch a coupe and they were pretty damn quick...i'd say there's not much differene between EK and DC2 vtirs

egcarbz
22-03-2005, 09:22 AM
stock to stock dc-2 vtir and ek vti-r..
dc-2 owns it..

egcarbz
22-03-2005, 09:22 AM
stock to stock dc-2 vtir and ek vti-r..
dc-2 owns it..

mikes94
22-03-2005, 10:05 AM
yup, civic vtir about the same, cars are almost identical upto 100km/hr, theres not much in it.

Wow ... I had no idea (I've never actually looked at the numbers)! I've driven an EK VTi-R and a CRX (del sol) ... (both B16A's obviously) and thought they felt quite gutless compared to my DC2 VTi-R. The torque difference between the 1.6L and 1.8L is huge IMO (probably helped by the DC2s variable intake manifold).

Mike

Hondavirgin
22-03-2005, 11:19 AM
Wow ... I had no idea (I've never actually looked at the numbers)! I've driven an EK VTi-R and a CRX (del sol) ... (both B16A's obviously) and thought they felt quite gutless compared to my DC2 VTi-R. The torque difference between the 1.6L and 1.8L is huge IMO (probably helped by the DC2s variable intake manifold).

Mike

I had exactly the same feeling when i was shopping around, test drove a del sol back to back with the DC2 vtir i ended up buying and the del sol felt, like you said, pretty gutless compared to the DC2.

djgarv
22-03-2005, 11:57 AM
i'm guessing a civic to a dc2 would be like a dc2 to a prelude
better handling but a little less grunt...both with their pros and cons over each other
personal preferences and wat you want from the car i guess?

MACBOYZ78
22-03-2005, 10:54 PM
how about for dc2r? 0-100

itr025
23-03-2005, 09:15 AM
I once GTECH'ed a dc2r and got 6.9-7.3. I would say it's low 7's.

MrJDMCivic
17-08-2006, 10:25 AM
dc2 vtir is quicker than civic vtir and the eg crx b16a. and the h22a prelude. its pretty much up there as the most quickest honda out there (for a sports car)

Spunkymonkey
17-08-2006, 10:53 AM
go with tony's figures. They are good approximates. Many people stock to stock ek4 and dc2 are pretty even, but the feeling from the cars as mentioned by others...the ek4 just doesn't feel like it responds that well compared to the DC2. I find I have to rev the crap out of our ek4 to get it moving compared to the DC2.

Felix
17-08-2006, 04:38 PM
the ek4 just doesn't feel like it responds that well compared to the DC2. I find I have to rev the crap out of our ek4 to get it moving compared to the DC2.

Yeah i've driven both and would have to say my DC2 VTIR is quicker. But only slightly. An EK4 with a good driver and a DC2 with an ordinary driver then the EK4 would be quicker...

turbo convert
17-08-2006, 05:44 PM
okay the type r gets a standard 8.5 0-100 i dont think your honda integra vtir's are getting 7 seconds
that 8.5 figure comes from drive car review
and i thaught that the EM1 was quicker, i am talking stock on stock than the teg vtir due to its gear ratios
thats my two cents

yourfather
17-08-2006, 05:58 PM
sif man. just cuz you own an EM1 doesnt mean that its the best.

you're in melb, how about you n me go down to Calder and sort this out.

It's not in the 8.5's. because, that's holden falcodore range.

turbo convert
17-08-2006, 08:02 PM
hold up no need to be so offencive
going from my 11sec skyline i know my em1 is slow no denying it the only honda which goes decentish is the type r.
and i would'nt waste my time paying to go to calder. lol
here the type r link its facts not dreamers!
http://www.mynrma.com.au/integra-type-r_hondaint_specs.asp
click the link:wave:

yourfather
17-08-2006, 08:06 PM
those people obviously cant drive dude, they barely managed a 15 in a Type R. wtf.

I mean - Redbook.com.au says this about a VTi-R

Power125kW @ 7300rpm Torque173Nm @ 6200rpm-6200rpm Acceleration 0-100Km/h7.9 secs

turbo convert
17-08-2006, 08:17 PM
okay i am not denying that they prob didnt pushthe car that hard but some figures ppl said here well i find it a little hard to beleive!
but in regards to the question i will belive what i read until i see it for my own eyes which i prob never will cause as long as i drive my civ i am never going to calder

Q_ball
17-08-2006, 08:20 PM
8.5 is below par for a DC2R considering some stock R's pull 14.1/2 down the 1/4.

turbo convert
17-08-2006, 08:21 PM
well i dont print the facts just show them

yourfather
17-08-2006, 08:57 PM
well, they arent facts when they arent the truth.

turbo convert
17-08-2006, 09:10 PM
okay this is getting rediculas, so yes your are correct and the ppl who have no point to prove dont care about hondas just take the car to test on a track to REVIEW the car lied for ......... reason
i would reather believe someone who set up a gtech in their car or even got their mate with a stop watch to measure!

FR33K
17-08-2006, 09:19 PM
hahahahahah thats so funny
8.5 and 15.9 for a DC2R

they must have mixed up the numbers with a hyundai excel

d15z1SUX
17-08-2006, 10:02 PM
its coz who ever reviewed the car probably cant launch or shift it n they probably wear cardigans all the time and drink their tea with the pinky finger sticking out. lol

sydteg21
17-08-2006, 10:03 PM
haha, 15.9sec, maybe the driver didn't know what vtec was and shift at 3000rpm, lol

Q_ball
17-08-2006, 10:26 PM
15.9 is rather shocking for a DC2R, I've seen stock VTiR timeslips with better times than that.
Ok, so we know that the NRMA source is inaccurate, lets not spam this thread up n e more, on topic guys!

fatboyz39
17-08-2006, 10:33 PM
stock dc2r around 14.5-14.9 depending on driver.
sotck vti-r 15.2-15.6 depending on driver.

Felix
17-08-2006, 10:40 PM
hold up no need to be so offencive
going from my 11sec skyline i know my em1 is slow no denying it the only honda which goes decentish is the type r.
and i would'nt waste my time paying to go to calder. lol
here the type r link its facts not dreamers!
http://www.mynrma.com.au/integra-type-r_hondaint_specs.asp
click the link:wave:


hmmm they also say the TypeR does the quarter in 15.9, I done high 14s in my very close to stock VTIR. Somehow i think a typeR is alot quicker then a 15.9

Felix
17-08-2006, 10:42 PM
and i thaught that the EM1 was quicker, i am talking stock on stock than the teg vtir due to its gear ratios
thats my two cents

No EM1 has basically the same gearing as a VTIR teg....

ReD_b16A
18-08-2006, 04:08 PM
okay the type r gets a standard 8.5 0-100 i dont think your honda integra vtir's are getting 7 seconds
that 8.5 figure comes from drive car review
and i thaught that the EM1 was quicker, i am talking stock on stock than the teg vtir due to its gear ratios
thats my two cents

u obviously have no clue mate:thumbdwn:

turbo convert
18-08-2006, 05:30 PM
well ur right i have no clue about HONDAS and quiet francly i wont waste my time taking one to calder, however as i stated i didnt write the article and not just the NRMA one there is another two i found in my quest. AND you guys are right they obviously didnt LAUNCH it or quick shift through gears how ever the point of this topic wasnt about a type r it was about a Teg Vtir 0-100 time and i just found it hard to believe that a relitvly stock Teg Vtir ran high 6seconds when although a stock type r listed at 15sec
http://www.racq.com.au/cps/rde/xchg/racq_cms_production/hs.xsl/New_Car_Rev_Foun_No_RHC_motor_buysell_reviewnew_ho ndintegratyper_ENA_HTML.htm

Kenno'Teg
18-08-2006, 06:29 PM
I remember reading the figures in Wheels or Motor. They timed it with a Correvit (spelling?) device which calculates 0-100 by laser guidance. If I recall correctly, the times listed for the Integra Type R, Integra VtiR, and Civic VtiR were, 7.2, 7.9, and 8.8 respectively.

EuroDude
18-08-2006, 06:57 PM
I mean - Redbook.com.au says this about a VTi-R

Power125kW @ 7300rpm Torque173Nm @ 6200rpm-6200rpm Acceleration 0-100Km/h7.9 secs

umm where are the 0-100 times at redbook.com.au?
I checked the teg, civic, euro, none of them specify 0-100 or quarter mile times :confused:
Link~ http://www.redbookasiapacific.com/au/vehicle/specs.php?key=HOND04CI

yourfather
19-08-2006, 03:40 AM
its only on some cars.

down the bottom it'll give you 0-100

yfin
19-08-2006, 07:23 AM
sotck vti-r 15.2-15.6 depending on driver.
I reckon mid 15s is right on the money. As for the DC5R doing 15.9s - that is just not representative of what a properly run in DC5R can achieve. Even a stock Euro lux can get high 15s and the DC5R is definately faster than that.

Don't believe all those articles - I have an Australian mag article when they first tested the s2000 in Australia. Either Wheels or Motor. 0-100 was in the 8s range. Total crap.

turbo convert
19-08-2006, 12:49 PM
ok i c what you saying but okay providing they didnt launhc etc is besides the point my orignal arguement is that i disagree that some ppl say teg vtir 0-100 6 seconds

T-onedc2
19-08-2006, 04:47 PM
Honda factory claims are as follows:
DC2R 6.9 (0-100)
DC2 7.4 (0-100) 15.2 (1/4)