PDA

View Full Version : octane 100 from SHELL



lspower
23-03-2006, 06:14 AM
Hi Guys,
I am back again.
After almost 6 months use of octane 100 on my 1990 integra LS(mod chip).
I managed to use 18 liters per 260km(city driving). Which works out cheaper than octan 98 or even unlead. Its cost me 1.35$X(480km/260) X18(liters) =44.9 $ a week. This includes 2-3 time air cond a week for 3-4 hours usage.
As compared to octane 98 = 1.28X480/260 X 22liters = 52$
Unleaded = 1.15 X 480/260 X 24.5 = 67.84$

As you can see, that I pay more for the octane 100, but I actually saved around 7 $ a week as compared to octane 98.

I have to admit, that I am shifting up gears very gently or (every 10 km/h up);
shifting around 2200 rpm. Now and then rev 3000 or twice every allowed to 7200 rpm.
Driving using 5th gear at 50km/h above, crusing around 70 km/h in city(max).

This is what I get. So far.......I dnt have any starting problems or chokes.

EuroDude
23-03-2006, 08:02 AM
wow 100octane? sweet!

but I heard that its useless using a higher octane than what Honda recommend. I guess u proved that theory wrong ;)

fly_vti
23-03-2006, 08:13 AM
wow 100octane? sweet!

but I heard that its useless using a higher octane than what Honda recommend. I guess u proved that theory wrong ;)

its nothing, i got my car dyno'd and i had no peformance gains. not even 1kw difference from 98 octane.. you need a ecu tuned for it to expect gains.

ProECU
23-03-2006, 08:14 AM
but I heard that its useless using a higher octane than what Honda recommend.

It is useless in my opinion.

Unless the ECU is re-tuned, the same fuel and ignition maps are used, so same fuel consumption will result.

lspower
23-03-2006, 08:18 AM
thanks for repling.
At this stage, I am only interested in saving $$$s and fuel comsumption.
Thats my whole point.

Dnt worry about the power gain or not. AS LONG as no power loss, RIGHT. but better fuel economy...........

ProECU
23-03-2006, 09:55 AM
yes

your response sounds as though you didn't understand my post.

spetz
23-03-2006, 11:42 PM
It is useless in my opinion.

Unless the ECU is re-tuned, the same fuel and ignition maps are used, so same fuel consumption will result.


But doesn't the factory ECU compensate for different RON levels in the fuel?

Basically, if it is a low RON, it'll retard timing by itself, and if it's higher RON, it will advance it, giving a bit more power?

lspower
24-03-2006, 07:39 AM
good on ya. Thats the right direction.....

ProECU
24-03-2006, 08:01 AM
But doesn't the factory ECU compensate for different RON levels in the fuel?

Basically, if it is a low RON, it'll retard timing by itself, and if it's higher RON, it will advance it, giving a bit more power?

I promise not to laugh but...

one thing the ECU does do is adjust the duty cycle of the injectors based on the O2 sensor input. Thats one area which "may" make a difference in fuel consumption.

lspower
24-03-2006, 08:57 AM
very interesting and tecnical...please share your experience.

elim
24-03-2006, 03:38 PM
It is useless in my opinion.

Unless the ECU is re-tuned, the same fuel and ignition maps are used, so same fuel consumption will result.

agreed, made jack shit difference to my car in terms of milage