PDA

View Full Version : Whats better???



del_la_sol
11-05-2004, 10:43 PM
what do you all reckon is better in the case of looks and performance. gen 2 crx or gen 3 crx.

**Ghost**
11-05-2004, 10:45 PM
CRX yeh? well... gen 2 looks tougher in my opinion, boxier, has that old skool kind of quality to it... while the new one is sleeker, but IMHO ok... no flames... hairdresser style...

ECU-MAN
11-05-2004, 10:55 PM
Gen III with Roof Off

A'PEXi
11-05-2004, 11:10 PM
g3

SIKCVC
12-05-2004, 01:03 AM
gen 3 looks better and would go harder stock...(unless your talking SiR) but i'd go for the gen 2 if i wanted a twisties car... i heard the targa style makes the gen3 little slower around corners. dunno how much truth lies within that though.

toE
12-05-2004, 01:59 AM
in terms of looks...Gen 3. :)

bizee_1
12-05-2004, 02:11 AM
i'd probably go for the gen2 for performance and looks, but i am biased 'cause i drive a '88 Civic. :)

Performance options aside, the Gen2 is lighter.
Looks options aside, the Gen3 has a targa roof.

Chi
12-05-2004, 08:33 AM
gen 2 for me

[[d a n n y]]
12-05-2004, 09:02 AM
stuff it get a civic...

haha but for the topic gen3..

even though...i dont like both crx's

del_la_sol
12-05-2004, 09:13 AM
yeah go the gen 3s. looks like their winning. :P

2ds
12-05-2004, 09:34 AM
]]stuff it get a civic...

haha but for the topic gen3..

even though...i dont like both crx's


Hehehe, don't like the gen 3 but you drive an eg

-2ds

MR-VTEC
12-05-2004, 10:44 AM
definetly gen 3. b16a. topless cruising. female appeal compared to the wedge that is. :D

weezer
12-05-2004, 10:47 AM
Since im not a hairdresser....I'd take a Gen 2 :D

-MuGen PoWer-
12-05-2004, 11:07 AM
Gen 3 heapz betta
nice ride
i love the short shift

MR-VTEC
12-05-2004, 11:26 AM
yeah go the gen 3s :D

CRXY01
12-05-2004, 11:27 AM
Gen 2 has better body, cheaper to buy more money for mods
will go just as hard due to weight

MR-VTEC
12-05-2004, 11:37 AM
please explain why it has a better body?????????????????? targa top.

2ds
12-05-2004, 05:56 PM
the lack of a targa top makes the body stiffer and weigh less.

-2ds

Jai-VTi
12-05-2004, 05:58 PM
Both gen's are dead SEXY!

MR-VTEC
12-05-2004, 07:04 PM
Posted: Wed May 12, 2004 5:56 pm Post subject:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

the lack of a targa top makes the body stiffer and weigh less.

-2ds


true but i mean in terms of looks. hehe. :P [/quote]

Civ_97
12-05-2004, 08:32 PM
gen 3 fo shizzle. very nice lil cars

MR-VTEC
13-05-2004, 06:07 PM
yep, nice looks + b16A and not very common.

Setanta
14-05-2004, 08:11 AM
2G > 1G > 3G

1G = awesome power to weight and great styling with the ZC onboard.
2G = excellent power to weight with D16 or B16 (JDM spec), glasstop (JDM spec), excellent styling.
3G = looks like shit, and is overweight, even if it does have a B16 in it. The power to weight is crap. My EF9 with the same specs as the Del Slow is quicker and it's heavy compared to the aussie ED Civics and rexs.

2G is the best all-rounder and the real renaissance CRX.

MR-VTEC
14-05-2004, 10:03 AM
:P :P :P each to their own i still believe the gen 3's are better i don't care what you say and so far they are winning on the poll.

tofu R
14-05-2004, 10:21 AM
haha y do u want a renaissance crx ?
this is a car, not artwork ..

Gen III no doubt + B18C
i would give in
haha

MR-VTEC
14-05-2004, 12:02 PM
yep gen 3 :D

[ slayer ]
14-05-2004, 12:07 PM
i vote gen 2, its sexy and fast... the del slo looks like a wierd ute from the side LOL

but i am biased as i got a gen 2

MR-VTEC
14-05-2004, 12:20 PM
each to their own. lol. a gen 2 looks like a tissue box or a door wedge.

bumthology
14-05-2004, 12:32 PM
at least gen2 looks better than eg's . ..bubble car..
=D
hehe
(waiting for the flames)

:(

MR-VTEC
14-05-2004, 12:41 PM
lol.

CTR Coupe
14-05-2004, 12:55 PM
Gen 2 all the way, del slows may have the b16a but the weight from having Targa top totally kills the advantage of having b16a.

skoota
15-05-2004, 08:10 PM
Gen 3's without a doubt

76
16-05-2004, 07:12 PM
meh, go the gen 2!

egcarbz
16-05-2004, 11:40 PM
chill no need to bag out the gen3's!
:)

skoota
16-05-2004, 11:51 PM
Seriously, to me this question is a no brainer - Gen 3 NO CONTEST! The older ones look too much like Civics at the front.

*Expecting serious flames after the comment above* :P

ts0nda
17-05-2004, 03:18 AM
gen3 looks nicer but id go for the gen 2 only cause its way lighter. altho as mentioned above a b18 in a gen3 would be ultimate

[ slayer ]
17-05-2004, 06:18 AM
a b18 in a gen 2 would be even better :)

MR-VTEC
17-05-2004, 08:57 AM
nup gen 3. better looking.

Setanta
17-05-2004, 04:54 PM
Oh and no - I won't give in. This is all about opinions and I've yet to see a decent looking gen 3. The EF/ED/EE is a better looking car :)

Setanta
17-05-2004, 04:55 PM
haha y do u want a renaissance crx ?
this is a car, not artwork ..

Gen III no doubt + B18C
i would give in
haha

Idiot :D

CRX stands for Civic Renaissance eXperiment

If you think the renaissance was all about artwork then you need to work on your education :p

skoota
17-05-2004, 05:19 PM
Haha what a dick ;) :arrow: :D

ML
17-05-2004, 06:28 PM
blow both of them get a gen 1 lighter than both easy engine swap and is good to look at to boot carnt go wrong :P :P

MR-VTEC
19-05-2004, 08:35 AM
ML think about how old a gen1 is.

setenta, man you never give up. show me what you think a good gen2 looks like. :P