View Full Version : [QLD] Should a 1989 CRX have Civic Hatchback on QLD rego sticker?
royal
28-05-2007, 03:03 PM
Hi all,
I am looking at getting a CRX, it is a 1989 model, is a Queensland car and the rego stickers detail says is a Civic and hatchback?
So is there something dodgy going on with this car? or is that how Queensland transport identity CRX?
Thanz in advance for everyones input!
ECU-MAN
28-05-2007, 03:31 PM
ED9 is correct for AUDM
royal
28-05-2007, 03:53 PM
how about the Civic hatchback on QLD transport rego sticker?
genkimashi
28-05-2007, 03:55 PM
ED means Aus spec...while EF model r JDM specs....CRX should be register as hatchback... mine r....
royal
28-05-2007, 04:02 PM
Cool! Thanz!
so VIN issue clear and hatchback confirmed....
But how about, it says CIVIC on the QLD rego sticker? should it says CRX?
Cheers
he-tec
28-05-2007, 04:18 PM
it should say civic racing xperiment :)
genkimashi
28-05-2007, 04:39 PM
Yeap... it should be stated CRX...as its different model from civic.. tats in WA... not sure of QLD...probably the same....
royal
28-05-2007, 04:47 PM
Can any local QLD guys clarify this?
czy_sol87
28-05-2007, 04:58 PM
hummm, mine doesnt even tell u what model it is, just says 1992 honda coupe
JHMDA9
28-05-2007, 05:29 PM
The gen2 will be listed as a Honda Civic hatchback in Queensland.
BLKek
28-05-2007, 07:29 PM
My old car was a silver sedan, when it was clearly a gold hatch, QLD transport had no idea after months of telling them to send me a new sticker - ended up taking it to one of the customer service centres and was changed over under a minute.
But I have seen a couple CRX's with civic listed on the rego.
royal
29-05-2007, 01:29 AM
so this crx's info seems to be genuine!
Thanz very miuch guys!
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.2 Copyright © 2024 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.