PDA

View Full Version : 06/07 S2000, Porsche Boxter or BMW Z4?



Maddog
24-09-2007, 11:40 AM
Hey guys,

If you had a choice between a 06/07 model s2000, a porsche boxter or a bmw z4 which one will you get? This is considering the cars are roughly around the same price $60,000 - $75,000.

The s2000 is the fastest out of all 3, but what about the boxter, I mean its a porsche after all and has more stlye.

I would find it hard to choose between the s2k and boxter, what are you opinions?

Mr_will
24-09-2007, 11:46 AM
you sure the s2000 is the fastest?

personally id go the z4, assuming its the 3.0litre. if the z4 was a 2.5litre, id go the boxster

m3ntAL_l2
24-09-2007, 11:52 AM
go audi TT?!

Maddog
24-09-2007, 12:12 PM
Serious the Z4? Why, can you explain?

EK4 Phil
24-09-2007, 02:23 PM
You should have specified which Z4. There are three different models: 2.5, 3.0, 3.2 being the M3 engine.
Here are some 0-100 time of the manuals from the Z4
2.5 = 6.5sec
3.0 = 5.7sec
3.2 = 5.5sec

My choice would be the s2000. I just love it quick, stylish and the Vtec.

dc2dc2dc2
24-09-2007, 02:28 PM
Boxster foe showwwwww

eriktufa
24-09-2007, 02:39 PM
How about a used m3 e46?

CRXONE
24-09-2007, 02:58 PM
Porche Boxter matey

MaskedAP1
24-09-2007, 03:53 PM
How about a used m3 e46?

you can not buy a used e46 m3 with 60-65g, these around 75g are about 70-100k kms.
t
here is a clip on youtube, they compare these 3 cars and s2k is the lowest.
with 70g dollars id get a Z4.

EZZY
24-09-2007, 04:04 PM
can you get a S2 Boxter S for that money?

DreadAngel
24-09-2007, 04:16 PM
Screw that, get a GT-R yO or Supra or something like that, beat the crap out of all those cars above period ;)

If your after Luxury and performance, can't go by the Toyota luxos like Chaser, Soarer, Aristo or maybe like a Cima or something ;)

euroasia
24-09-2007, 05:16 PM
you should take into consideration maintainence costs, insurance, drivability and most important what you like best.

My preference would be an boxster S, or a R34 skyline GTR. If they are not available options, i would choose a s2000.

CRXONE
24-09-2007, 06:10 PM
Screw that, get a GT-R yO or Supra or something like that, beat the crap out of all those cars above period ;)

If your after Luxury and performance, can't go by the Toyota luxos like Chaser, Soarer, Aristo or maybe like a Cima or something


Rice boy! Toyota Saurer, Skyline, Supra = :thumbdwn::thumbdwn::thumbdwn:

:zip:

jko2
24-09-2007, 06:12 PM
There is a topgear episode comparing these exact three cars
Jeremy Clarkson - s2000
James May -Boxster
Hampster - z4
Good episode, boxster came out on top on their track, then z4, then s2000.
Watch it!

Just search for "top gear s2000 bmw" on youtube.

.::F[L]Y::.
24-09-2007, 06:14 PM
with 70k odd to spend id go for a s1 lotus exige or perhaps an elise with a k20

DreadAngel
24-09-2007, 06:25 PM
Rice boy! Toyota Saurer, Skyline, Supra = :thumbdwn::thumbdwn::thumbdwn:

:zip:

Awwww shitz... Just cause I didn't fly down to buy your CRX :p

Buy Gracer :p ---> http://cgi.ebay.com.au/R33-GTR-Skyline-GRACER_W0QQitemZ260102592349QQihZ016QQcategoryZ149 118QQcmdZViewItem

jko2
24-09-2007, 06:28 PM
Toyota saurer hehe.. sounds like toyotasaurus.

It's Toyota Soarer..

.::F[L]Y::.
24-09-2007, 07:16 PM
you still looking for a crx dreadangel?

ludecrs
24-09-2007, 07:33 PM
I wouldn't buy any of those 3...

2nd hand market - E46 M3 though they drive like meh, or a Lotus Elise. Certainly my choice would be a purple 1998 NSX-T....

I still wish I got that car..... :(

chicken8
24-09-2007, 08:33 PM
Nsx!!

DreadAngel
24-09-2007, 08:49 PM
*slaps forehead* NSX got skipped in my list.... BAHHHH *goes emo like Bao and slashes wrist*

Hey Fly, nah, got the car of my dreams coming in ;)

IZY-10
24-09-2007, 09:28 PM
go boxter German made quality that you cant go wrong with

domin8
24-09-2007, 10:41 PM
Definatley s2k why casue you can mod it mod,has style aswell as class.

the z4 has class but the z4 has known to have rpoblems with their gear box
the boxster appartently their fuel tank get dirty after 45000kms and from what i heard (mechanic) ofcourse its very hard to find a spare fuel tank so yeah well thats my choice :)

Mr_will
24-09-2007, 11:04 PM
You should have specified which Z4. There are three different models: 2.5, 3.0, 3.2 being the M3 engine.
Here are some 0-100 time of the manuals from the Z4
2.5 = 6.5sec
3.0 = 5.7sec
3.2 = 5.5sec

My choice would be the s2000. I just love it quick, stylish and the Vtec.

well, if you want to be specific, the 3.2 is a Z4M, and is not a convertible, but rather a coupe.

it seems, from the fact that the two other cars he has chosen are convertibles, that he is after a soft top

anyway, boxsters are povo porsches, i just dont like them.

i prefer the styling of the BMW. the s2000 is old, has **** all torque.

AsH_
25-09-2007, 12:27 AM
S2000...

aznsiko
25-09-2007, 12:33 AM
S2K!!! ALL THE WAY.. i really dont like european cars.. theyre shit to drive and shit everything lol.. OVER RATED

DreadAngel
25-09-2007, 12:34 AM
S2000 overrated, worlds most powerful NA 2L engine, but heck get it wrong and its very sleepy :p

Perry
25-09-2007, 01:22 PM
whatever floats ur boat i guess have ask around for maintenance cost for the z4?

Maddog
25-09-2007, 01:33 PM
Dont u guys think the Z4 is ugly as hell?

I would go for z4 if it looked half decent. Whats with all those curves and lines?

S2000 looks the best out of all three.

As for the boxter it looks like a small bettle... <--- ugly

MaskedAP1
25-09-2007, 01:33 PM
There is a topgear episode comparing these exact three cars
Jeremy Clarkson - s2000
James May -Boxster
Hampster - z4
Good episode, boxster came out on top on their track, then z4, then s2000.
Watch it!

Just search for "top gear s2000 bmw" on youtube.

thats the one im was talking about, but it under wet condition

Maddog
25-09-2007, 01:35 PM
if they didnt race under wet conditions the s2000 would have killed them both.

s2k got no traction in the wet.

aaronng
25-09-2007, 02:51 PM
Only 2.0L and already no traction. ;)

deon
26-09-2007, 08:08 PM
lol think about what your getting for your money
s2k:
a honda lol
a 2L I4 whoopte doo it makes 17x kw its still shit
average interior
on the good side though it does handle nicely.
boxter:
its a pov porche, but its a PORCHE not a honda
decent power..fairly meh though.
quite a nice package, and the new ones look great
z4:
z4 is a great car, but 3l upwards i think just a really good car.

id say the boxter but if you got the best z4 then that one. i think you should add a 350z to that list, they're a really great car, a bloke on this forum has a twin turbo convertible, nice car.
btw what is this shit about dirty fuel tank and z4's with bad gearbox's provide solid evidence of this before commenting, im betting its just some crap you conjured up in your head. aside from that, its probably gogin to be under warranty.

vtek
26-09-2007, 09:34 PM
They should ban threads like this what do you mean 176kw is shit from a 2L Deon? Do you know anything about cars? its a roadster its suppose to be plain and featureless thats the way they have designed it. Are you also going to complain about the cabin noise aswel? IDIOT!!! Bet you havent even driven one dam newb.

2002 TeGgY
26-09-2007, 10:07 PM
i would defenately go nsx...not cause its a honda but cause its different. i havent seen one on the raod for the past year or so...i see more bentlys than nsx's!!

dc2dc2dc2
26-09-2007, 10:15 PM
NSX = overpriced honda

thats why u don't see many on the streets.

DreadAngel
26-09-2007, 10:22 PM
More like there aren't that many to buy and overpriced, purchase price alone can be scary, look at the insurance, its a supercar so prepare your arm and a leg ;)

aaronng
26-09-2007, 10:44 PM
A tiptronic non-S Boxster is about the same in acceleration as a manual Euro. So go for the S or be prepared to be disappointed.

ryuhou
26-09-2007, 11:12 PM
z4 for sure

CRXONE
27-09-2007, 10:31 AM
Yeah Z4's are horny

deon
28-09-2007, 02:02 AM
They should ban threads like this what do you mean 176kw is shit from a 2L Deon? Do you know anything about cars? its a roadster its suppose to be plain and featureless thats the way they have designed it. Are you also going to complain about the cabin noise aswel? IDIOT!!! Bet you havent even driven one dam newb.

are you stupid? i already said great wow highest hp per lt wonderful. its still only 176kw dumbass. not only that i did mention its a good car for hammering and driving hard. You dont know me, im not a "newb" i just dont use this forum much, i probably have a much greater knowledge about cars than you. I'll say again s2k DOG under 5krpm..most driving woudl be done under that so unless yoru using it specifically to thrash i dont see the point in it. it would be just like any other 4cyl car, it only shines when you thrash it.

vtek
29-09-2007, 10:48 AM
Yeah your really knowledgable bagging the most powerful NA 2.0ltr motor in the world and one of the best cars hondas ever built. Do you know the concept behind the Vtec? from what you are trying to say, Newb it seems like you dont. Your comparing straight line performance and thats not what Honda is all about. If they were then they would just bolt on turbo chargers on everything and it will kill everything on the road.

CRXONE
08-10-2007, 11:06 AM
LOL

Just go buy a wog chariot buddy

EL_DC5
10-10-2007, 05:18 PM
the boxter is only 15&#37; porsche

DreadAngel
10-10-2007, 08:56 PM
Boxster poor mans 911, its like telling everyone, hey, I can't afford 911 but since I love Porsche so much, I bought a Boxster instead lolz

I like Boxster still though hahaha

aaronng
10-10-2007, 09:09 PM
The old 911s before the 996 would bite you in the ass as they would spin when you lost rear traction. That's why they made the boxster. The MR layout is more forgivable to drive. You know that MR spins easily when you lose it, it's even worse with RR. So imagine the old pre-996 model 911.

Oh, and it's cheaper.

EK4R
10-10-2007, 09:32 PM
ELISE k20
ELISE k20
ELISE k20
ELISE k20
ELISE k20
ELISE k20
ELISE k20

2002 TeGgY
10-10-2007, 10:39 PM
this kinda offtopic, but has anyone ever done a K20 swap into one of those MG roadster? i hear they're really light and they're afordable...

Maddog
15-10-2007, 10:26 PM
the boxter is only 15&#37; porsche

....Umm Are you for real????

EL_DC5
16-10-2007, 10:10 AM
Yeah man Im for real Ithink its even less than that.
the 911's are like 85&#37; porsche. i saw it on a car show or a magazine

Louis - Type S
22-10-2007, 10:12 AM
All really nice cars, but if i had the money i would get a Z4 M Coupe

IZY-10
22-10-2007, 11:33 AM
Yeah man Im for real Ithink its even less than that.
the 911's are like 85% porsche. i saw it on a car show or a magazine

lol a porsche is a porsche no matter how much its costs or how fast it is!

EL_DC5
22-10-2007, 11:40 AM
My point is that Porsche's are n=known for there quality etc. Hand crafted and Porsche engineered.

The Old 911 where almost entirely made by Porsche. where as the new Porsche out source there parts etc. and has completely sold out in the boxers as they are like 15% made by Porsche...


lol a porsche is a porsche no matter how much its costs or how fast it is!

aaronng
22-10-2007, 02:05 PM
If the 987 model Boxster shares 30&#37; of parts with the 997 model 911, then how the hell can the Boxster be only 15%?

BTW, you must be dreaming about who makes parts, Porsche doesn't make 100% or even 80% of the parts that go into an old or new Porsche. The drive belts are 3rd party, the AC are third party and the rotors are 3rd party. The suspension is made by Bilstein and HECK, the damn transmission is Aisin (Japanese!).

EL_DC5
22-10-2007, 02:16 PM
It was an article on a Magazine I read im sure it was motor,

Said something in the lines of the 997 being 65% porsche and the boxster being 15% and the Boxster S alittle higher. But it was over a year ago, it could be 35% not 15 but its Just a sort of rating that they give. It may be that the out sourced parts are better than the one manufactured by Porsche ...

If the 987 model Boxster shares 30% of parts with the 997 model 911, then how the hell can the Boxster be only 15%?

BTW, you must be dreaming about who makes parts, Porsche doesn't make 100% or even 80% of the parts that go into an old or new Porsche. The drive belts are 3rd party, the AC are third party and the rotors are 3rd party. The suspension is made by Bilstein and HECK, the damn transmission is Aisin (Japanese!).

aaronng
22-10-2007, 02:28 PM
It is economically unfeasible for a car manufacture to manufacture close to 100&#37; of their own parts. Think about it, imagine the number of different engineers that they would have to hire and how many additional separate factories they would require. They would have to be located in different locations some processes like brake rotor casting can't be near another section which does temperature sensitive assembly/components.

The only company that does all their own manufacturing is Ferrari, and they have the appropriate price tag to accompany that.

aaronng
22-10-2007, 02:29 PM
Oh, and I don't trust Motor magazine. :p

Maddog
22-10-2007, 04:55 PM
the boxter is only 15% porsche

If thats the case, then s2000 must be 1% japanese, since all the parts are from china, taiwan

JDM.Power
22-10-2007, 05:00 PM
boxster for me, but
id rather buy a r34 gtr with that money, you can get them around 50-60k nows with good kms and perfect condition.

0098
22-10-2007, 05:36 PM
if i had a choice i wouldnt get the s2000 put it that way

aaronng
22-10-2007, 06:15 PM
If thats the case, then s2000 must be 1% japanese, since all the parts are from china, taiwan

False.

aaronng
22-10-2007, 06:35 PM
if i had a choice i wouldnt get the s2000 put it that way

Same here. I'd pick up a 2000 Boxster S for $60k

sretocz
22-10-2007, 06:40 PM
Why just the three cars? Id take the GTR over any of the cars you are looking at. RB26=winner However if i had to choose, I personally would knock that Porsche of the list it would be either the Z4 or S2000, most probably the S2000 since i think it has the best shape. None of those cars are exceptional for the price you pay for em.

IZY-10
22-10-2007, 10:57 PM
Just watching season 9 of top gear and it was interesting that they held a survey for the viewers to see which car they are most happy (50,000 voted) with and what do you know. Honda s2000 at number 1 again, the z4 came in 62, while the porsche boxter came in 43. I found it ironic that they brought up these three cars. Its episode 5 btw if anyone wants to know

aaronng
22-10-2007, 11:52 PM
People in UK pay a lot more taxes for cars which generate high levels of CO2. That means high capacity engines are taxed higher. Also, many of the average rich man/woman who owns a Porsche wouldn't waste their time on a Top Gear survey.

Do you know if the survey rank is calculated based on # of votes or based on # of votes of happy owners vs total # of owners with that particular car?

IZY-10
23-10-2007, 10:50 AM
People in UK pay a lot more taxes for cars which generate high levels of CO2. That means high capacity engines are taxed higher. Also, many of the average rich man/woman who owns a Porsche wouldn't waste their time on a Top Gear survey.

Do you know if the survey rank is calculated based on # of votes or based on # of votes of happy owners vs total # of owners with that particular car?

i think it was votes on how happy they are with the car or unhappy. So they sent in what they liked about it and what they didn't. S2000 has been number one in there survey for two years straight. Top gear is the UK top rating show so im sure there are wide variety of people that vote

connections
24-10-2007, 07:26 PM
porsche boxter

WhiteAP1
24-10-2007, 07:57 PM
Just watching season 9 of top gear and it was interesting that they held a survey for the viewers to see which car they are most happy (50,000 voted) with and what do you know. Honda s2000 at number 1 again, the z4 came in 62, while the porsche boxter came in 43. I found it ironic that they brought up these three cars. Its episode 5 btw if anyone wants to know

I remember a couple of months ago, a member of the british S2ki forum posted a link up for an internet survey very similar to this one and encouraged the rest of us to vote. At the end of the voting period , surprise surprise, the s2000 was on top. Like any survey they can be bias or manipulated.

End of the day who really gives a shit. Some ppl like oranges others like apples, its that simple. Threads like this are really, really useless.

ludecrs
24-10-2007, 08:04 PM
Welcome to OzHonda.

.::F[L]Y::.
24-10-2007, 08:07 PM
^^hahaha these threads appear once every month, and we always see the same replies lol

s2000 is a great car to buy second hand. i wouldnt buy a brand new one.

nvmee
24-10-2007, 09:13 PM
who in their right mind would choose a s2k over Porsche. z4s are not exactly good looking but wateva makes u happy... Porsche is sexy ^^ but u also carry a image of being a rich mother fvker which i dont like cos it doesnt suit me :P

s2k = pfft lol
z4s are ok.....not my style

ludecrs
24-10-2007, 09:37 PM
Have you driven a Boxster?

Boxster = pfft lol*fixed.

Boxster S is about the only comparision.

Andw0o
25-10-2007, 04:16 AM
lol would you rather be rich in a rich community? or rich in a poor community?
lol personally id go s2000. mainly because in its class its one of the top guns.
where as alot of the fellow ozhonda peeps. know boxter = poor mans porche.
ahahah

nvmee
25-10-2007, 11:22 AM
yeh i know its a poor mans porsche. but its still a porsche =)

i can say k24 civic eg ....but its still a civic doesnt matter how much money u put into it

ludecrs
25-10-2007, 11:47 AM
yeh i know its a poor mans porsche. but its still a porsche =)

i can say k24 civic eg ....but its still a civic doesnt matter how much money u put into it

Much like the new Type R's...... $40K+ insure & on road fees! Honda can go **** themselves. $43K for a badge that says Civic is just beyond rediculous.

ROLLED
28-10-2007, 04:20 PM
S2000 only because it's rarer! Especially in Melbourne!

CRXONE
29-10-2007, 01:01 PM
This is such a ghey debate. S2K for value for money, the other two are more expensive 2nd hand.

nvmee
29-10-2007, 08:58 PM
**** dat man....get a r1 ..... hheheheheh i think im getting addicted to bikes now.

WhiteAP1
29-10-2007, 09:55 PM
Jet powered bar stool FTW!

CRXONE
30-10-2007, 09:02 AM
Yeah bikes are awesome during the summer months. I've got an RS250
2-stroke Aprilia and it is so SO much fkn fun I take on 600cc bikes all the time =-)

ProDriver
30-10-2007, 11:38 AM
s2k wins hands down, the z4 has one ugly looking front and the boxster is not a real porsche. imho!

ShAwNeX
30-10-2007, 01:38 PM
Straight away the BMW is out (no particular reason).

My choise would be between the S2000 and the boxter.

Personally I'd go for the Boxter becase it is a Porsche after all. The S2000 may be more powerful (correct me if i'm wrong) but think of it this way. The honda is the top model, while the boxter is the lowest model and yet its abilities are almost equivalent. Also, haven't you always wanted to drive a German sports car? And finally as u said, it's more stylish.

But on another aspect, the porsche would cost a lot more to run.

ShAwNeX
30-10-2007, 01:40 PM
s2k wins hands down, the z4 has one ugly looking front and the boxster is not a real porsche. imho!

I'll have a boxster any day. Even if it isn't a real porsche.

ShAwNeX
30-10-2007, 01:51 PM
Yeah man Im for real Ithink its even less than that.
the 911's are like 85&#37; porsche. i saw it on a car show or a magazine

What do u mean by 15% and 85%? In terms of parts or design or what aspect? If your talking about out sourcing parts then they should have stringent quality control standards. So from my point of view not much difference.

FN2TypeR
09-11-2007, 12:06 AM
S2000 for raw fun!

Z4 or Boxter? Neither. SLK is way better!!

nvmee
11-11-2007, 07:35 PM
slks = HAWT

StrawberryFace
12-11-2007, 11:49 PM
s2000 = poor mans boxster.

WhiteAP1
12-11-2007, 11:58 PM
s2000 = poor mans boxster.

Well since you put that way, you must be right:(

weezer
13-11-2007, 08:32 AM
s2000 = poor mans boxster.

S2000 = rich mans mx5 LOL

.::F[L]Y::.
13-11-2007, 01:55 PM
S2000 = rich mans mx5 LOL

LOL

i have always thought the s2k was based on some of the mx5 design. Except honda made it better

aaronng
13-11-2007, 02:06 PM
S2k looks too mean to be compared to an MX-5. I'd still pick the S2k over the MX-5 even if it came with a piss weak engine (say an underpowered 120kW).

aus91integra
13-11-2007, 02:25 PM
i hate it when ppl at work call my s2k a mazda.. damn noobs... hahahaha

nvmee
13-11-2007, 02:36 PM
lol !

.::F[L]Y::.
13-11-2007, 02:40 PM
got pulled over once. and the cop called my s2000 an mx5 lol

Perry
13-11-2007, 03:19 PM
S2k looks too mean to be compared to an MX-5. I'd still pick the S2k over the MX-5 even if it came with a piss weak engine (say an underpowered 120kW).


how come is it due to the looks or the over all 50/50 weight distribution and other factors?

aaronng
13-11-2007, 05:48 PM
how come is it due to the looks or the over all 50/50 weight distribution and other factors?
Looks, interior, handling and also "wow factor". My housemate has an NB MX-5 and it's pretty low-key. It is easy to drive though.