ebay - elcheap coilover springs

[BlitZ]

hi guys..

anyone got experience with these?..

has anyone tried the coil over sleeves with konis and maybe oem design springs?


thanks,
dan

[civic_mods]

1 prob with those cheap spring is they tends to hv very high spring rate n they r same rate all round

[dsp26]

hi guys..

anyone got experience with these?..

has anyone tried the coil over sleeves with konis and maybe oem design springs?


thanks,
dan

had em... stiff as... fortunately, the shop i bought mine from somewhat had a clue enough to tell me the rates were between ~16-18Kg all round.

gives a VERY firm ride though...your worst nightmare on bumpy roads.

If you can get em delivered for less than $100 get em, and just replace the springs. i don't think you can re-heat the ones that come with it... BUT for the price of getting custom springs made you may as well have gotten the Ground Control combo...

[bennjamin]

there is NO design or research behind these type of springs - simply made with a thick piece of metal tube , into a linear rated spring.
Might be a good cheap replacement for some hardcore track coilovers but i would not touch them.

Remember , they would be made of an inferior metal too and no doubt would slowly sag over time and possibly shatter/break.

[dsp26]

Remember , they would be made of an inferior metal too and no doubt would slowly sag over time and possibly shatter/break.

true.. their just (ALL of them advertised) cold wound steel... they however don't sag but I could imagine them shattering at high speed bumps as stated... especially in winter...

after already having them as well as a few people who have... we all think their OK but will never go back to them.

especially since they don't have the additional preload springs, they dont have full compressed contact against the upper mounts and are therefore free moving

they don't sit on the perches properly and slip around and make clanking noises.... this slipping causes MASSIVE extreme camber shifts instantly!!! The rubber bush that comes with them dies in 1 week due to the shifting, even sikaflexing them to the perches don't help. Plus.. one main reason they will never be road legal is coz in Aus, sleeves are required to be welded on to shock bodies (as i have been told by a sussy shop) these simply attach to the shock body via 3 allen key screws from the sleeve which constantly loosen and eventually digging a hole into the shock body from resulting vibrations.

Also due to extreme stiffness, you will have to get VERY decent tyres as a result of traction loss due to these not absorbing much forward inertia on hard brake...

[BlitZ]

true.. their just (ALL of them advertised) cold wound steel... they however don't sag but I could imagine them shattering at high speed bumps as stated... especially in winter...

after already having them as well as a few people who have... we all think their OK but will never go back to them.

especially since they don't have the additional preload springs, they dont have full compressed contact against the upper mounts and are therefore free moving

they don't sit on the perches properly and slip around and make clanking noises.... this slipping causes MASSIVE extreme camber shifts instantly!!! The rubber bush that comes with them dies in 1 week due to the shifting, even sikaflexing them to the perches don't help. Plus.. one main reason they will never be road legal is coz in Aus, sleeves are required to be welded on to shock bodies (as i have been told by a sussy shop) these simply attach to the shock body via 3 allen key screws from the sleeve which constantly loosen and eventually digging a hole into the shock body from resulting vibrations.

Also due to extreme stiffness, you will have to get VERY decent tyres as a result of traction loss due to these not absorbing much forward inertia on hard brake...

great info..

how do they differ from the skunk2 coilover sleeves... and maybe even the ground control? are they mounted the same?

[VTI-RRR]

just intalled em 2day got em of ebay for $100 deliverd and are shit VERY VERY STIFF the mechanic that installed em for me said to get new springs asap but for the ajustable pice keep it it would do the job but springs need to go.....

i go apex springs but are too long should i cut em or get new 1s that would do the job......

[iced]

dont buy those coilover sleeves kit with springs of unknown spring rate. thats just stupid.


however the us guys use ground control sleeves with eibach springs with success.
you can buy the sleeves and get springs custom custom made from places such as kmac and all springs.

ive come across a few guys in the US who use ground control sleeves on KYB AGX. obviously you have to hack up the shock and weld the sleeve mounting assy onto the shock body. those guys do autocross with much success.
their installation is similar but differs from car to car.

[iced]

just intalled em 2day got em of ebay for $100 deliverd and are shit VERY VERY STIFF the mechanic that installed em for me said to get new springs asap but for the ajustable pice keep it it would do the job but springs need to go.....

i go apex springs but are too long should i cut em or get new 1s that would do the job......

if you cut the spring it will increase the spring rate.
also if you are using them with OEM shocks you have a high chance of skidding off the road, hitting a rail, or oncoming car because the stock dampers cannot sufficiently control the stiff springs and keep your car on the road and hence your braking will suffer also.

your solution will be to get new springs custom made to suit the dampers that are on the car. if the dampers are adjustable .eg KYB AGX, KONI YELLOW then do as above.
if you using OEM dampers i HIGHLY suggest you remove the coilover sleeves. You will do nothing for the safety of your own self or other drivers on the road.

16-18kg springs on OEM shocks will be plain stupid.
16-18kg springs on KONI yellow or KYB AGX is also plain stupid. i can imagine even with the dampers maxed out the suspension is be riding like on worn/blown shocks.

[dsp26]

if you cut the spring it will increase the spring rate.


how so?

[iced]

how so?
As the number of active coils increases, the spring rate decreases.
Therefore, if you decrease the active coils by cutting them off you increase the spring rate.
Any mechanical engineers feel free to correct me. ;)

Since the day after the flinstones, cut springs are known to reduce a cars bodyroll. WHY?
It increases spring rate more than anything else.
There are ways to calculate how stiffer a spring will be if you cut a certain amount of coils off etc. I wont go there.
To prove this in the most simple example.
The same reason why a bouncy ride can be mistaken for cut springs. The spring rate is too high for the damper.
ie. Under dampened suspension.

Cut springs are NOT feasible in this day and age. Rework is required to get the spring to seat properly. This is why your common cut coil spring is very dangerous.

[bennjamin]

Not true. On any progressive springs , cutting any coils off will adversely change the dynamics of the spring , not the rate. If anything it decreses the spring rate. IE DONT DO IT :)

[BlitZ]

Not true. On any progressive springs , cutting any coils off will adversely change the dynamics of the spring , not the rate. If anything it decreses the spring rate. IE DONT DO IT :)

i stand to differ.. it will make it harder..

[bennjamin]

im only speaking from experience :) A angle grinder and the need to have a low car as a P plater isnt a good combo.

Anyway , it is stupid to do so DONT DO IT

[iced]

even if its progressive spring the rule still applies.
if you cut off the progressive part then it effectively becomes a linear rate. you are merely removing the progressive component.
im not too informed on the dynamics part of things. that is very deep into the mechanical part of things which does not involve only spring rate but rather the damper and everything else.
basically how the simplest progressive spring works is once the progressive part collapses and become dead coils the active coils remain active.
however, you are bringing up a topic all on its own which is not related to the basic fundamentals of spring rates.

you cant cut coils of a spring and make it softer.
2 identical springs with same wire diam, same coil gap.
the one with 5 coils will be stiffer than the one with 8.

[VTI-RRR]

thnks fopr the ifo guys but ill be buying springs off STTICH which would fit the coilover sleve.....

what you guys rekon???

these are the springs>>>>
****http://www.ozhonda.com/forum/showthread.php?t=75431****

[SeverAMV]

cutting springs doesnt make the spring rate any stiffer than it already is, you'll need to remake/heat them to make them stiffer. cutting springs just reduces the range of the compressions that the spring can make, so it gives you the illusion that it is stiffer. same amount of weight will still lower the car the same as before (as the spring will still have the same spring rate that it was originally wound to), only difference is that they'll bottom out sooner with more people, as they will reach their maximum compression sooner (at this point they'll just look like a cylinder with screw-type grooves).

you should only cut springs if you're absolutely sure you wont carry passengers, and you have measured it out to be the exact same length spring on each corner. but even then, its stupid to cut springs as you'll be affecting the bound and rebound rates (altho dampers are mainly responsible for this, theyre still attached to the spring and the spring does play a role in bound and rebound), and it will make your car's handling a little more unpredictable. luckily for me, you guys arent in south australia. i'd hate to see someone with cut springs take a corner too fast and see the rear randomly snap oversteer into someone else.

[JohnL]

cutting springs doesnt make the spring rate any stiffer than it already is, you'll need to remake/heat them to make them stiffer. cutting springs just reduces the range of the compressions that the spring can make, so it gives you the illusion that it is stiffer. same amount of weight will still lower the car the same as before (as the spring will still have the same spring rate that it was originally wound to), only difference is that they'll bottom out sooner with more people, as they will reach their maximum compression sooner (at this point they'll just look like a cylinder with screw-type grooves).

Sorry, but this is absolutely incorrect. Cutting coils off will always in every case increase the spring rate. A coil spring is simply a torsion bar that has been wound up into a coil, so, when the spring compresses the coil wire elastically deforms in exactly the same manner as does the wire in a torsion bar, i.e. the wire is twisted.

If you don't believe this then try this thought experiment (or you could do it for real if you were really sceptical / keen!):

Take two identical coil springs and cut a coil or two from one. Now uncoil them so that we make them into straight torsion bars. The one we cut will of course be shorter than the one we didn't. Now clamp each bar at one end so it can't move at that end, and now attempt to twist each bar with a torque wrench through say 90°. The shorter bar will require more torque to twist to 90°.

Still don't believe? Lets take it to an extreme to more clearly demonstrate the principle. Cut the short bar much shorter still, say to about 100mm long and twist again. You'll find the very short torsion bar will now be hugely stiffer than it originally was. This principle applies whether we shorten the coil wire length by a lot or by a little.

Things such as coil number, coil diameter and free length only affect spring stiffness in so far as they affect the length of wire in the coil (ignoring any dead coils that may be present in a 'progressive' spring). It may be however that coil pitch angle may have some very small affect; imagine a spring with a very steep coil pitch angle, the steeper the pitch becomes the more force passes through the wire in a sort of 'end-on' manner, though unless pitch angle is severe the effect is probalby quite small or the spring would attempt to rotate the spring seats as the spring compressed.

Having said this, I think you may be correct in that in some cases the shortened spring might possibly bottom out more easily than the unshortened spring, despite being stiffer. This is because the shorter spring lowers the ride height, but the stiffness increase may not be enough to compensate for the shorter distance from the top of the damper body to the bumpstop.

A cut spring will compress / lower less with X additional weight than the same spring uncut, because it is stiffer. The cut spring will probably ride lower with this extra weight but this is because the initial ride height will be lower.

If you cut coils off a spring this will reduce how far the coil can be compressed before it becomes 'coilbound', but the real limiting factor here will be the damper body and bumpstop lengths, i.e. the ride height will be lower and suspension travel less, but the 'bottomed out' height will be the same.

Heat treatment will make no difference to the spring stiffness, but it may have a significant affect on how far the spring can compress (wire twist) before it becomes permanently deformed or how long the spring might last. Nearly all steels (with the possible exception of some very exotic alloys that won't be found in springs etc) have the same elastic stiffness regardless of composition (alloy) or heat treatment (note that stiffness is not the same as strength). So, any two coils (or torsion bars) that are made from differing alloys or with differing heat treatment but having the same physical dimensions will have the same stiffness.

This doesn't mean they will be the same though. The difference will be in how far the spring can be compressed before it becomes either 'sagged' (permantly deformed) or actually breaks, i.e. where its elastic limit lies. Another likely difference may be in resistance to fatigue failure, whether this be from sagging over time or eventually breaking. Heat treatment / alloy also affect such things as shear strength, malleability etc, but this isn't an issue for springs.

[JohnL]

you should only cut springs if you're absolutely sure you wont carry passengers, and you have measured it out to be the exact same length spring on each corner. but even then, its stupid to cut springs as you'll be affecting the bound and rebound rates (altho dampers are mainly responsible for this, theyre still attached to the spring and the spring does play a role in bound and rebound), and it will make your car's handling a little more unpredictable. luckily for me, you guys arent in south australia. i'd hate to see someone with cut springs take a corner too fast and see the rear randomly snap oversteer into someone else.

You should never cut springs on a road car because its illegal! It may be OK on a race car, but only if you really understand what you're doing and why you're doing it.

Having said this I'll put my hand up to being guilty of this once, cut less than one coil from the springs on the rear of my old Cressida to get the rear end down a touch because it just looked silly at the standard height (bum in the air, massive rear arch gaps). I did make sure that I didn't end up with the springs loose at full droop, and it didn't affect the handling adversely (maybe just ever so slightly better!), but it was just a small cut!

Cutting the spring will affect the bump and rebound rates by increasing it, but most probably not enough! The problem with cutting springs (other than having a loose spring at full droop) is the increased risk of bottoming out because the rate increase is unlikely to be great enough to compensate for the reduced suspension travel.

Bottoming out in a corner causes an instantaneous weight transfer to the bottomed out suspension which also means an instantaneous transfer from the 'unbottomed' suspension on the same axle line. This can result in an abrupt and substantial reduction in grip at that axle line, the results of which can be unpredictable and dangerous as you say.

Also, cutting the spring may affect the correct seating of the spring on the spring seat at the cut end. Note that many if not most springs are ground and / or wound in a particular manner at one end (or both) to sit properly in the seat. Changing this may cause stresses in the seat and / or coil(s) near that seat that might potentially lead to spring or seat failure in the long term... maybe.

[SeverAMV]

Sorry, but this is absolutely incorrect. Cutting coils off will always in every case increase the spring rate. A coil spring is simply a torsion bar that has been wound up into a coil, so, when the spring compresses the coil wire elastically deforms in exactly the same manner as does the wire in a torsion bar, i.e. the wire is twisted.

If you don't believe this then try this thought experiment (or you could do it for real if you were really sceptical / keen!):

Take two identical coil springs and cut a coil or two from one. Now uncoil them so that we make them into straight torsion bars. The one we cut will of course be shorter than the one we didn't. Now clamp each bar at one end so it can't move at that end, and now attempt to twist each bar with a torque wrench through say 90°. The shorter bar will require more torque to twist to 90°.

Still don't believe? Lets take it to an extreme to more clearly demonstrate the principle. Cut the short bar much shorter still, say to about 100mm long and twist again. You'll find the very short torsion bar will now be hugely stiffer than it originally was. This principle applies whether we shorten the coil wire length by a lot or by a little.

Things such as coil number, coil diameter and free length only affect spring stiffness in so far as they affect the length of wire in the coil (ignoring any dead coils that may be present in a 'progressive' spring). It may be however that coil pitch angle may have some very small affect; imagine a spring with a very steep coil pitch angle, the steeper the pitch becomes the more force passes through the wire in a sort of 'end-on' manner, though unless pitch angle is severe the effect is probalby quite small or the spring would attempt to rotate the spring seats as the spring compressed.

Having said this, I think you may be correct in that in some cases the shortened spring might possibly bottom out more easily than the unshortened spring, despite being stiffer. This is because the shorter spring lowers the ride height, but the stiffness increase may not be enough to compensate for the shorter distance from the top of the damper body to the bumpstop.

A cut spring will compress / lower less with X additional weight than the same spring uncut, because it is stiffer. The cut spring will probably ride lower with this extra weight but this is because the initial ride height will be lower.

If you cut coils off a spring this will reduce how far the coil can be compressed before it becomes 'coilbound', but the real limiting factor here will be the damper body and bumpstop lengths, i.e. the ride height will be lower and suspension travel less, but the 'bottomed out' height will be the same.

Heat treatment will make no difference to the spring stiffness, but it may have a significant affect on how far the spring can compress (wire twist) before it becomes permanently deformed or how long the spring might last. Nearly all steels (with the possible exception of some very exotic alloys that won't be found in springs etc) have the same elastic stiffness regardless of composition (alloy) or heat treatment (note that stiffness is not the same as strength). So, any two coils (or torsion bars) that are made from differing alloys or with differing heat treatment but having the same physical dimensions will have the same stiffness.

This doesn't mean they will be the same though. The difference will be in how far the spring can be compressed before it becomes either 'sagged' (permantly deformed) or actually breaks, i.e. where its elastic limit lies. Another likely difference may be in resistance to fatigue failure, whether this be from sagging over time or eventually breaking. Heat treatment / alloy also affect such things as shear strength, malleability etc, but this isn't an issue for springs.

i get what you mean about shorter bars requiring more torque to bend, but it isnt really any stiffer/stronger than it was originally designed to be, it is only the illusion that it is more stiffer (i cant really explain what i mean too well), in the end, it is still of the same compound and of the same concentration. its a one of those paradoxical examples where less mass can produce more inertia and thus a greater resistance to flex. but yeah, i can see where you're coming from there.

with regards to the reheating of springs, i was referring to something i heard that people were doing, where they heat up the spring to reshape and make it shorter but thicker to increase the rigidity/stiffness.

[bennjamin]

when you reheat/ reset springs , you change their length only. Not any other dimensions ( IE thickness) Its to lower a car etc.

Good discussion guys !

[BlitZ]

i get what you mean about shorter bars requiring more torque to bend, but it isnt really any stiffer/stronger than it was originally designed to be, it is only the illusion that it is more stiffer (i cant really explain what i mean too well), in the end, it is still of the same compound and of the same concentration. its a one of those paradoxical examples where less mass can produce more inertia and thus a greater resistance to flex. but yeah, i can see where you're coming from there.

with regards to the reheating of springs, i was referring to something i heard that people were doing, where they heat up the spring to reshape and make it shorter but thicker to increase the rigidity/stiffness.

Good job john..

In lamen turns..

20 coils compress 15cm with 5kg....
b/c each coil will compress n amount.
15cm = n x 20

If I remove 1 coil..
it will only come down by n x 19


its so logical


90% of ozzie spring manufacturers... when they tell u they can do custom rates that normally just cut it and rebound the ends.

[fatboyz39]

I always thought when you cut the springs it increases the spring rates???

[bennjamin]

When you cut linear springs it increases the rate. When you cut progressive springs generally it increases the static rate. But dynamically ( when moving) the spring itself will still only move within its limits because you have not altered the stiffer rate , only the "comfort" rate (whic usually sits above as the closer coils)

[BlitZ]

When you cut linear springs it increases the rate. When you cut progressive springs generally it increases the static rate. But dynamically ( when moving) the spring itself will still only move within its limits because you have not altered the stiffer rate , only the "comfort" rate (whic usually sits above as the closer coils)


yeah thats if u cut a progrssive coil... progressive coils bound under pressure ... but if they dont bound the spring rate will increase.. even though it might not be much:thumbsup:

[JohnL]

i get what you mean about shorter bars requiring more torque to bend, but it isnt really any stiffer/stronger than it was originally designed to be, it is only the illusion that it is more stiffer (i cant really explain what i mean too well), in the end, it is still of the same compound and of the same concentration. its a one of those paradoxical examples where less mass can produce more inertia and thus a greater resistance to flex. but yeah, i can see where you're coming from there.

with regards to the reheating of springs, i was referring to something i heard that people were doing, where they heat up the spring to reshape and make it shorter but thicker to increase the rigidity/stiffness.

With due respect, I doubt you really are getting what I mean or see where I’m coming from or you wouldn’t be saying what you’re saying. I’ll try again!

Just to be clear, I don’t mean bend. A torsion bar is designed to twist, though it would usually tolerate some bending (anti roll bars usually bend a little bit as well as twisting, especially more complexly shaped ARBs or those with less than ideal linkage geometry, but the purer the twisting action the better). Even a well designed coil spring may at some points within the spring have a very small element of wire bending with flexure (more likely near the spring ends, or in any area where coil pitch might change), but it should be very slight if it exists.

The torque force required to twist a torsion bar is, as far as the wire in the spring is concerned, exactly the same as the ‘weight’ of the car, i.e. the wire in the coil doesn’t ‘see’ any difference between a torsional force and car weight because the force (torsion or car weight) acts into and is resisted by the wire in exactly the same way, whether the wire is wound into a coil or not.

There is no paradox here, and no Voodoo! If you shorten the spring by cutting it then there it is not just a subjective illusion of stiffness increase, it really is objectively stiffer (though it may possibly be, with some drivers, that there could be an illusion that the stiffness increase is greater than it actually is in reality, but this may simply be a placebo effect, i.e. they expect a stiffness increase so imagine one greater than is actually the case).

On the other side of the coin, possibly some people might even subjectively perceive it to be a little softer if as a result the suspension bottoms out a lot more due to the lower ride height, keeping in mind that many / most drivers aren’t all that sensitive to subtle dynamic changes and that the rate increase from cutting is unlikely to be all that great unless the cut is pretty drastic!

I’ve slightly raised the rear ride height on my CB7 to lessen bottoming out (especially with a load of rear seat passengers) and the occasional chassis scrape on road humps, and (at first) it certainly subjectively felt as if it were just a little stiffer (and it does help decrease under-steer slightly by increasing rear weight transfer), even though I know it isn’t and I’d like to think of myself as being quite sensitive to subtle handling nuances! (after all I was club champion at my local kart club, which impresses me if no-one else!!).

The stiffness increase of a cut spring will be directly related to the % decrease in wire length and is most probably a very linear relationship, i.e. if you make the wire length say 10% shorter then the stiffness will increase by 10% (I think, meaning I don’t think that there is any logarithmic progression or whatever involved, as there is with a wire diameter increase, but I could be wrong!).

The spring is of course still the same “compound” (I think you mean alloy), and the same “concentration” (less certain what you mean here), but regardless of your meaning it’s for all intents and purposes irrelevant to this discussion. I’ll reiterate; alloy and state of heat treatment have at most little (according to ‘Young’s Modulus’ - less than 1%) or nothing to do with how stiff the spring is (only how long it will last), but any change in physical dimension (i.e. wire length and / or diameter) WILL affect spring rate.

Note that the dimension of free length has no affect on rate (nor coil diameter for that matter, unless greater or lesser length or diameter represents a change in wire length), only an affect on ride height. This is the case unless the free length is so long that the resulting pre-load is so great that when the car weight is lowered onto the spring the spring cannot compress at all (i.e. the preloaded ‘tension’ exceeds the car weight). So long as it is not so great that static car weight cannot compress the spring, ‘pre-load’ created by compressing the spring tighter between the upper and lower spring seats is also a non issue re rate, as preloading a spring to a greater or lesser degree will in no way stiffen or soften the spring, only alter the ride height.

Pre-load can be increased by either increasing spring free length or by further compressing an existing spring via the seat mounts, and the affect is identical (all else being equal), i.e. ride height increase. Excessive ride height is of course a bad idea, not just because you may excessively increase CG and / or roll centre heights, but also because you might significantly reduce suspension droop travel. The effect of running out of droop travel is similar to running out of bump travel, i.e. abrupt weight transfer from inside to outside, which may be OK in some circumstances and not in others. Decreasing pre-load will simply lower ride height.

A mild steel spring will be just as stiff (within its elastic range) as any other spring of similar physical dimension made from properly tempered spring steel, though the mild steel spring may not last more than 5 seconds driving because mild steel has a very low elastic limit (might not even manage to support the chassis at designed ride height before the spring sags, depending on car weight etc. etc.). With any steel we’ll actually find in any non hypothetical spring on real cars there will be no difference in rate between them if the springs are of the same physical dimension, the only difference being that the spring with better steel will last longer.

You mention “mass” and “inertia”, your meaning is unclear, but I suspect you are getting confused. Regardless of what you think you mean, greater mass will ALWAYS involve greater inertia than less mass. At any rate, while the mass of the spring is real, for purposes of this discussion it is irrelevant. When discussing chassis dynamics, mass and inertia of mass are only of concern when we are considering the affect mass and inertia will have on weight transfer (of sprung mass, and to a lesser degree unsprung mass), and the ratio of sprung to unsprung mass and the affect this might have on required damper rates etc (less unsprung mass always being very highly desirable, for both ride quality and handling).

Having said that, any difference in mass between a heavier or lighter spring (that could be fitted to a particular suspension) will in reality be so small as a component of overall unsprung mass as to be of no practical consequence, unless we were considering the design requirements of a very serious racing car, where every gram is of consequence!

The only way to make a spring “thicker” is by making it from thicker wire. It might be OK to heat a (compressed) spring to shorten its free length if you know exactly what you’re doing and have complete control of the process (temperature etc), but this will only affect the free length and thus the cars ride height, not the spring rate. I would be cautious of using such methods because of the danger of ‘over-shortening’ the spring and / or heating it to a degree that starts to interfere with the original temper of the steel, which is not to say it will…if you know what you’re doing! If the temper is affected the rate will be unaffected, but the spring may ‘sag’ prematurely.

A good spring can last effectively forever. The OE springs on my CB7 are still identical lengths on each axle line (LF = RF and LR = RR), despite being 16 years old! This is because Honda designs the spring well for its intended purpose, uses high quality materials, good technique and tight tolerances in manufacture (good old Honda!). However, if you cut even a very good spring you may shorten its useful lifespan, maybe a little… maybe a lot?

The design and intended purpose of a spring can also affect spring life. Springs made from shorter wire length will be stiffer (all else being equal), but will also be more prone to premature sagging (or possibly breaking, though I think this much less likely) compared to a spring of identical stiffness made from a longer wire (more coils) of thicker dimension. This is because for X suspension deflection the spring with the shorter wire length has to twist the wire more per cm of wire length than the spring with the longer wire length, each deflection causing the wire steel to more closely approach its elastic limit potentially leading to earlier fatigue.

Some racing cars use springs made from a relatively short wire of relatively small diameter, which can result in a stiff spring (or less stiff, if you want that) with relatively few coils of wire of relatively small diameter. This is done mostly for the desirable purpose of reducing unsprung mass, but, such springs can have a very short lifespan and must be replaced regularly for fear of spring failure (sag or break), i.e. the spring becomes a consumable item. Such a spring is not what you want on a road car even if it may perform very well, for a short while! A spring that has been cut has been moved at least a step toward more closely resembling this kind of spring, which may or may not be a problem depending on the specifics.