PDA

View Full Version : dc52 steering wheel on dc2


zropts
13-12-2007, 11:53 AM
Hey guys,

Just like to know if a DC5R steering wheel fits onto a DC2 VTIR?

Is this a straight fit or not?

Cheers
:thumbsup:
bungsai
13-12-2007, 07:38 PM
nope.
zropts
14-12-2007, 07:38 AM
cools
BlitZ
14-12-2007, 08:32 AM
dc5=ek=cl=s2k

EG=dc2=Iwannabedifferent
squish85
25-12-2007, 12:29 AM
sorry to hijack your thread zropts.... But would a DC2 Type R steering wheel fit onto a vtiR DC2 ?
Chi
25-12-2007, 12:40 AM
yes it will
Moya
26-12-2007, 01:24 PM
sorry to hijack your thread zropts.... But would a DC2 Type R steering wheel fit onto a vtiR DC2 ?

No it won't. It will fit, but needs rewiring etc for the Airbag.

And it's illegal to drive around in an Airbag car with it disconnected.
Chi
26-12-2007, 01:49 PM
You can make anything fit if you have money
Moya
26-12-2007, 02:14 PM
You can make anything fit if you have money

Well in that case, yes the DC5R wheel fits on DC2.

And 6.2L AMG CLS Engine fits into EG6 - straight swap.
preludacris
26-12-2007, 03:17 PM
if the air bag is dc, there is no chances of it deploying is there?

i want the dc5r wheel in my prelude. i dun really care about the airbag.
destrukshn
26-12-2007, 04:00 PM
if the air bag is dc, there is no chances of it deploying is there?

i want the dc5r wheel in my prelude. i dun really care about the airbag.
get in a accident, and your airbag is not connected, your insurance is void, so is your rego.
m0nty ITR
27-12-2007, 11:16 AM
Well in that case, yes the DC5R wheel fits on DC2.

And 6.2L AMG CLS Engine fits into EG6 - straight swap.

Runs out and purchases Bugatti W16 engine. :p
m0nty ITR
27-12-2007, 11:20 AM
get in a accident, and your airbag is not connected, your insurance is void, so is your rego.

Ironic considering that SRS airbags cause injuries and are expensive to replace. One would think insurance companies would be happy not to have SRS airbags fitted. I understand the whole "as the manufacturer intends" clause though.
destrukshn
27-12-2007, 11:22 AM
Ironic considering that SRS airbags cause injuries and are expensive to replace. One would think insurance companies would be happy not to have SRS airbags fitted. I understand the whole "as the manufacturer intends" clause though.
some cause injuries, i'm sure it does more good than harm.
all depends how you position yourself as well.
air bag had saved my head from hitting the steering wheel before.
Moya
27-12-2007, 01:16 PM
Ironic considering that SRS airbags cause injuries and are expensive to replace. One would think insurance companies would be happy not to have SRS airbags fitted. I understand the whole "as the manufacturer intends" clause though.

The words of a man who's never been in a serious car accident.
m0nty ITR
27-12-2007, 01:27 PM
The words of a man who's never been in a serious car accident.

I've done enough driver training to know that airbags are designed to minimize harm. Driver and passenger front airbags can be harmful if driver and passenger are not seated correctly. Airbags are only effective at higher speeds. In accidents at around 40-60km/h injuries from SRS units are more prevalent. I undrstand that they become more effective at higher speeds but if SRS units were the ultimate safety device wouldn't they be compulsory in motorsport? As it stands to compete in certain categories of motorsport, airbags must be removed.

This is taking things off topic, but to increase safety in cars manufacturers must look at better restraint systems. The lap/sach seatbelt is out of date and can cause chronic injuries even at low speeds. Again, if passengers are incorrectly seated the belt can become completely useless and passengers can slide underneath it. Why couldn't manufacturers employ a 4 point harness in cars?
Moya
27-12-2007, 01:32 PM
I've done enough driver training to know that airbags are designed to minimize harm. Driver and passenger front airbags can be harmful if driver and passenger are not seated correctly. Airbags are only effective at higher speeds. In accidents at around 40-60km/h injuries from SRS units are more prevalent. I undrstand that they become more effective at higher speeds but if SRS units were the ultimate safety device wouldn't they be compulsory in motorsport? As it stands to compete in certain categories of motorsport, airbags must be removed.

Err no. Motorsport you have full bucket seats, plastic window, and you're harnessed in. And in extreme motorsports your neck is also locked into the seat to stop whiplash. Not to mention the helmet.

I was recently in a 100KM smash on the highway with my car flipping. So I know what I'm talking about when I say they help.

Sure I'm sure they get a little bump on the head (which I got) - but the point is they save lives not stop injury. And when you're about to hit a concrete barrier at 90KM/hr the last thing you think about is 'oh noes I'm about to get a bump on my arm, and tomorrow cricket!'
m0nty ITR
27-12-2007, 01:43 PM
Err no. Motorsport you have full bucket seats, plastic window, and you're harnessed in. And in extreme motorsports your neck is also locked into the seat to stop whiplash. Not to mention the helmet.

I was recently in a 100KM smash on the highway with my car flipping. So I know what I'm talking about when I say they help.

Sure I'm sure they get a little bump on the head (which I got) - but the point is they save lives not stop injury. And when you're about to hit a concrete barrier at 90KM/hr the last thing you think about is 'oh noes I'm about to get a bump on my arm, and tomorrow cricket!'

You were in a crash @ 100km/h. As I said, they have a greater impact at higher speeds. I was commenting on the invasive nature of a front airbag. Side and curtain airbags are much better in harm reduction. Neither deploy outwards.

Anyway, we've taken this far enough off topic. Glad to hear you weren't hurt badly. :thumbsup: