Suntzu
24-08-2008, 10:48 PM
I noticed recently that the CU2 has a 11.5:1 compression ratio. It also revs higher and is still on 95 ron fuel. The CL9 is 10.5 on 95 ron.
My 2005 CL9 has been Jtuned to 98 Ron. I can only use this as the timing etc is advanced and so on. The cars a fair bit quicker than stock and is a lot smoother to drive with better throttle response and the drive by wire delay has been exorcised. Its been really excellent to have the mild tune with my header, CAI and high flow 300 cell cat. It a new car to drive.
Im getting the car dyno'd soon and am hoping for a approx 20kwatw improvement. I did do a baseline but it was stuffed up so i wont have a definative result. I will use the same dyno as Euroact13 though.
On that note Euroact13 i doing an awesome mod fitting a new k20z head to his car, im pretty excited by this. Please see his thread as im not trying to steal his thunder, just making the point that there are other options out there for tuning that are outside the box.
So my question to the gurus here is...
What if I increase my compression ratio to 11.5 like the CU2?
My cars already tuned for 98 ron, it will NEVER have anything less in it so should make good gains and good torque. I understand a 10% increase in compression gives a 10% power torque improvement across the complete rev range.
I have a few questions though:
Would this be done by shaving the head and using a thinner gasket? Is there enough room to do this? Or are we talking expensive pistons here?
Whats the expensive component of this? Removing/installing the head or getting it shaved? What do you think it would cost? Or could i remove it myself given the proper tools and assistance?
What are the associated risks of increasing the compression?
Has anyone done this on other cars with good results?
How do you think it would go in terms of bang for buck?
Maybe i should fit a k20 head AND increase the compression ratio of that at the same time. I wonder if increasing the ratio will screw up my ignition timing or whether it will adapt to the lower head height.
Im after an educated opinion on the potential validity of this idea.
Look forward to your comments.
cheers!
My 2005 CL9 has been Jtuned to 98 Ron. I can only use this as the timing etc is advanced and so on. The cars a fair bit quicker than stock and is a lot smoother to drive with better throttle response and the drive by wire delay has been exorcised. Its been really excellent to have the mild tune with my header, CAI and high flow 300 cell cat. It a new car to drive.
Im getting the car dyno'd soon and am hoping for a approx 20kwatw improvement. I did do a baseline but it was stuffed up so i wont have a definative result. I will use the same dyno as Euroact13 though.
On that note Euroact13 i doing an awesome mod fitting a new k20z head to his car, im pretty excited by this. Please see his thread as im not trying to steal his thunder, just making the point that there are other options out there for tuning that are outside the box.
So my question to the gurus here is...
What if I increase my compression ratio to 11.5 like the CU2?
My cars already tuned for 98 ron, it will NEVER have anything less in it so should make good gains and good torque. I understand a 10% increase in compression gives a 10% power torque improvement across the complete rev range.
I have a few questions though:
Would this be done by shaving the head and using a thinner gasket? Is there enough room to do this? Or are we talking expensive pistons here?
Whats the expensive component of this? Removing/installing the head or getting it shaved? What do you think it would cost? Or could i remove it myself given the proper tools and assistance?
What are the associated risks of increasing the compression?
Has anyone done this on other cars with good results?
How do you think it would go in terms of bang for buck?
Maybe i should fit a k20 head AND increase the compression ratio of that at the same time. I wonder if increasing the ratio will screw up my ignition timing or whether it will adapt to the lower head height.
Im after an educated opinion on the potential validity of this idea.
Look forward to your comments.
cheers!