Here it comes
http://world.honda.com/news/2006/406.../images/01.jpg
1.8l 103KW and 2.2 diesel 103KW, nothing special but looks ok.
For more info go to http://world.honda.com/news/2006/406...peS/index.html
Printable View
Here it comes
http://world.honda.com/news/2006/406.../images/01.jpg
1.8l 103KW and 2.2 diesel 103KW, nothing special but looks ok.
For more info go to http://world.honda.com/news/2006/406...peS/index.html
A bit under powered me thinks....
Considering a EK VTIR has more power and probably weighs less too.
Also it looks abit crap.
civic type S ??? wat happen to the 140kw type R ? :(
looks like a big bubble!!
and the article says the type s is the foundation for the type r, or something like that i just skimmed it quickly.
FFS at least have a K20A donk in it.
Hmmmm - not bad but I guess this raises a question for me. Will Honda Australia just import this one now instead of the R?
i read in the Wheels magazine this month it said they lookin to import the civic type R?? then whats this with the type S...cbb reading the article
thats a ***n ugly car man..
wow, with 100kw of power, they'll be able to keep up with base model corollas
or the 2.2L civic RR that was rumoured a few months back :(:(Quote:
Originally Posted by EK4R
I read on Hot4s about the concept of civic SI, it looks and performs way better than this
I saw this UK built civic at an airport lounge in Europe somewhere. I couldn't help but notice that it has very irregular panel gaps which makes me wonder about build quality. I should have taken photos to show you guys - but the bonnet was completely out of alignment and the rear quarter panel gaps leading to the boot were different right to left. Yes, it is built to a price - but the early 90s Japan built Honda Civic in my family was built very tight and consistent in terms of panels.
(hey in case anyone is wondering why I was thinking about panel gaps - I had heaps of time to wait for my plane and spent like 20 minutes looking over this civic!)