http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/con...8087730017428/
This really made me mad, the reviewer obviously knows nothing about cars... give him his 6L jag :rolleyes:
Printable View
http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/con...8087730017428/
This really made me mad, the reviewer obviously knows nothing about cars... give him his 6L jag :rolleyes:
"Nipponese convertible" ROFL:D
I think that reviewer is just trying to make a name for himself....:rolleyes:
i think that some things there are founded. Remember he DOES have to write and make it interesting. Two common compaints of the S2K is of the cramped cabin and lack of power at higer revs. As for the rest, its opinion really so I tihnk that he was fairly justified in saying that. If the S2K had a 6 cylinder engine then it would be my number one dream car (that is within reach). Still its a sweet car.
NOT HAPPY JAN ....
Didn't know S2K is that bad .... :D
doesnt the s2000 rev limit to 9000 rpm, not 8000 ?
i dont think that company likes honda's in general - they gave the acura TL a pretty bad review as well
I think the review is on the 2.2l S2000 where honda lowered the redline. Not sure if its 8000 but it does not rev as high as the 2l one.Quote:
Originally Posted by kam
Robert Fargo :thumbdwn:
stuff him
s2000s are top, but its true, only takes one bad review for ppl to start talking crap
close that website down!!
as if... s2000 is my dream ... apart from NSX
vtec must of scared him.
Quote:
I reckon only a stone deaf driver could withstand the brutal din coming from the S2000’s engine at full chat.
I had a look in motor trying to disproove his theory, and in the little overview section at the back, they gave the s2000 3/5 stars and said Positive, Mid life overview gives the car more life, Negative, sketchy handling...
Isnt it praised for its handling?
Hmm screw him, how dare he bag out the beautiful S2000. :(