The latest craze...
Are they that good? has anyone got back to back dyno graphs for them compared to something like say JDM 4-1?
Is there any sacrifice in power in any range over the traditional 421 or 41?
Printable View
The latest craze...
Are they that good? has anyone got back to back dyno graphs for them compared to something like say JDM 4-1?
Is there any sacrifice in power in any range over the traditional 421 or 41?
do you mean tri hard headers
hahahahaha
YES i woulod like to know the same.. coz im running jdm 4-1 atm. and wanna join in the latest craze.. but really dont wanna sacrifice anything atm powerwise.
but yeah..
Blitz u talking about the hytek or bc?
Bang for buck headers for a b18c 1.8L.
For 1.6L we havn't test them yet, but i heard toda headers are one of the best headers for a B16a 1.6L
I thought Tri Y's are 4-2-1 ?? :confused:Quote:
Originally Posted by BlitZ
Tri Y merges Ports 1-3 as oppose to traditional 1-4..Quote:
Originally Posted by Nepolian
*Correction
So are 1-4 not merged? Or is it merged 2-3 and 1-4, just like 4-2-1 headers? :)Quote:
Originally Posted by BlitZ
actually..
Tri Y
its ports 1-3 2-4 at the secondaries
Traditionally... its
1-4, 2-3 at the secondaries
tri Y merge the first 2 early and then merge the last 2 very far down the track.
Supose to reduce turbulance for better flow
Hmm, wouldn't a tuned length 1-4, 2-3 have less turbulence than a 1-3, 2-4 since you won't have pulse collision at the first Y joints? Of course, I agree the tri-Y is better if you were comparing to the cheaper untuned-length 4-2-1 headers.
do u recommend 4-2-1 for b16 /1.6LQuote:
Originally Posted by fatboyz39
I have a set on my B20VTEC, good for making power :thumbsup: but not so good ground clearance within 3 weeks I have already scraped the bottom two primaries :thumbdwn: