Yea, I would prefer the CU2 than the civic but only thats missing from the basic model is the fog lights and parking sensors. Besides that, what about changing the lights to xenon. Is it expensive to do so? I assume the bulbs are pretty cheap
Printable View
Yea, I would prefer the CU2 than the civic but only thats missing from the basic model is the fog lights and parking sensors. Besides that, what about changing the lights to xenon. Is it expensive to do so? I assume the bulbs are pretty cheap
why do u plan on getting the car for only a year but still want so many optional extras that dont make much of a difference except cost u a few grand that will disappear when u sell it?
do u have a car already? id reccommend sticking with it
Nope I dont have a car at the moment. I need to have a car for work purposes but most likely I will only be needing it for a year. Civic 2.0, the accord euro CU2 (basic) and now the mazda 3 sp25 is the ones that I am considering. I would much prefer the CU2
Uhhh... You guys meant mazda 3 sp 25 not mazda 2 right?
If its mazda 3 you guys were referring, yea then its worth the price since it comes with a lot of features and not to mention it actually comes with sat nav on board, sounds like a good bargain though.
However, I honestly really love the looks of CU2. Mazda 3 hatchback also looks good but not as classy as the CU2. Damn, spoilt for choice now. Features or looks is more important ? lol
The only difference between the CU2 basic model than the other models are just features right? driving, engine performance are the same between models right?