front + side + side + rearQuote:
Originally Posted by iamhappy46
i read somewhere that the development of an engine with no front mount was to reduce the likelyhood of engine damage as a result of a frontal collision...
Printable View
front + side + side + rearQuote:
Originally Posted by iamhappy46
i read somewhere that the development of an engine with no front mount was to reduce the likelyhood of engine damage as a result of a frontal collision...
My point exactly, it has a front engine mount, as the engine is on the drivers side... Why would Honda develop a front engine mount after years of not fitting one?? The front one is an engine steady or intertial damper, many RWD cars use one between the head and a strut tower... stop the turbo or intake manifold from hitting the struts.Quote:
Originally Posted by tinkerbell
I actually believe that most factory mechanical engineers would place human life over engine damage, from a design point of view. It is a good concept and deserves credit but as with most frontal collisions, the chassis rails get bent long before the motor is terminally damaged = write off.Quote:
Originally Posted by tinkerbell