yeah i read that too..auto only, nothing to be excited about...
Honda just has been a soft c0ck in recent years...pissing me off
Printable View
yeah i read that too..auto only, nothing to be excited about...
Honda just has been a soft c0ck in recent years...pissing me off
guys it's got the paddle shifts, so it's not all that bad. the jazz vti-s with the paddle shifts are pretty good, i'm hoping the civic will be the same if not better.
i'll give ya some feedback after the 06 civic drive day i'm goin to next week ;)
Even with paddle shifts, it is still an auto and will have that slight 0.5 second lag between you pressing the paddle and the gear shifting. It's the same as having the sport selectable auto mode. Just that it's in paddle form...Quote:
Originally Posted by panda[CRX]
and how long does it take for the average manual driver on ozhonda to gears? less than 0.5 sec?
i was sceptical of them at first but knowing how many people drive shift gears manually this isn't really much worse
there's 2lt manual too. according to:
http://www.hondacivic.com.au/civic_specifications.aspx
there's fuel consumption for manual.
pity its not a hatch
that car would be hottt with a mugen dominator kit
i see more k20 swaps on the horizon :thumbsup:
Shame. MT would have been great.
the 2.0L model has the K20Z3 engine in it and the type S has K20Z1....apperently the K20Z3 has a betta head design so we could see a type S civic hear wit the potencial to have more power than the tegie type S
no coupe?
no hatch? :(