Honda CRX, 1.6L DOHC - ZC (JDM) 1989?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Klayemore

I heard it was Civic Renaissance type-X ?????

---

^^ your correct.

imo a lil jdm crx would be pretty cool. my mate used to have one with a jdm zc(stamped zc) im pretty sure it didnt come with an lsd tho.

7500 seems ok for a crx thats immac and stuff but 9000? wow that seems high.

got pics or link?

lsd was optional on all jdm crxs

ok are both these engines DOHC ??? sorry "nub" to the whole honda engine series :P

pok

by any chance is this a nsw car?

i got a ZC in my crx (also stamped zc) well it goes very well and iv had no problems i also have an lsd gearbox, short shifter, heavy duty clutch

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Pokiou

ok are both these engines DOHC ??? sorry "nub" to the whole honda engine series :P

pok

---

Yes they are both pretty much the exact same engine. 1 was released in Australia (d16) the other in Japan (zc)..

Crx's tend to hold their value pretty well. I originally had a ZC and it was a great car nice and peaky.. I love my b16a SiR now has the bit more power and I find it has a fair bit of toque. Maybe have a look around for an SiR some go for near the same price but finally decision rest on the condition of the car.

Enjoy and hope you find a good crx.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by rexi3

I love my b16a SiR now has the bit more power and I find it has a fair bit of torque.

---

lmfao, the b16a is actually pretty well known for having relatively little torque :p

yeah i think you'll find a ZC in good running order will have more torque low down than a B16A. this is due to the 90mm stroke as opposed to the 77mm stroke of the B16A. even peak torque of the B16A is only a couple more Nm over the ZC
however the higher compression of the B16A gives it better response. plus the shorter ratios tend to have you sitting higher in the rev range more often.

fixed: cheers yonas

seems very pricey
fair enuf the engine has just over 100 clicks but its a 17 year old car man
i wouldnt pay anything more than 7500 for it. so stand firm

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by sivic

yeah i think you'll find a ZC in good running order will have more torque low down than a B16A. this is due to the 90mm stroke as opposed to the 81mm stroke of the B16A. even peak torque of the B16A is only a couple more Nm over the ZC
however the higher compression of the B16A gives it better response. plus the shorter ratios tend to have you sitting higher in the rev range more often.

---

the car only has shorter ratios depending on the gearbox selected equiped y1/ys1

yes thats true as the cable tranny's from the first B16's had quite long gears FD: 4.266, although many of the L3 tranny's from the ZC's in the EF's had a FD: 3.88, although some came with a FD: 4.25.

know that the ZC CRX equipped OEM LSD, my EG4 gear box has changed to ZC LSD gear box, close ratio than normal D series gear box.