If you can't search here, or honda-tech.com by yourself, you aren't ready. Simple as that.
You havn't given us any goals of the car, so we can't even give you a place to look.
Printable View
If you can't search here, or honda-tech.com by yourself, you aren't ready. Simple as that.
You havn't given us any goals of the car, so we can't even give you a place to look.
Search is your friend.Quote:
Originally Posted by iceman_vti
If you wanna go with a h/k series swap, then your best bet would be to not spend money on the D-series you currently have and save it towards the h/k..Quote:
Originally Posted by iceman_vti
That is unless you wanna go an all out D-series swap...
Thats always an option.
what ben says is exactly rightQuote:
Originally Posted by bennjamin
theres no point spending $5k+ on an engine conversion, when the rest of the car is not up to scratch ie ek4 comes with more features than the ek1, not just accessories, but also, like front strut bar and rear sway bars, different suspension, brakes etc
imo if u want something fast, start with something fast!
Your on the right track, but its possible to fix up an EK1 to an even better brake/sussy and engine setup than an EK4, you could at least match the EK4 setup.Quote:
Originally Posted by czy_sol87
IMO its a given that you should update your suspension, chassis and brakes when going for huge performance upgrades.
There's noway that the stock EK1 brakes could pull you up on an all-out engine build!! And whats the use of building it so powerful if it cant handle?
With my car ive gotten my sussy and brakes finished (or close to) before touching the engine.
dude if you work at nissan u should know that nissan RB engine was one of the world best known performance engine especially RB26dett on GTR capable of producing 500hp+ without internal mod.Quote:
Originally Posted by iceman_vti
if ya say the only good thing nissan got is maxima you are wrong better do researh. first GTR came in australia 1990 to 1991 dominated the GT racing(kill the v8 holden) later they came out with rule to restrict the GTR to less boost but guess what its still dominated then they wanted the GTR out of the game. That how it got its name "Godzilla"
RB26DETT and even SR20DET do not meet current emission levels around the world and hence are not used anymore in new cars.Quote:
Originally Posted by Spec_R
Also, you need to decide whether you wanna go FI or NA as you would internally set them up different with different CR's etc.. I wouldn't build an NA engine and then turbo it. I personally would decide from the start.. It's either a FI build or an NA build..
but thats not to said is crap?Quote:
Originally Posted by aaronng
you think about when the first gtr came out 1989 it was way ahead of its time. is control with the correct catyalic converter compliance with australian standards otherwise it australia wont have it in.
performance engine release more emission than NA
Im still new to honda but what i have gather after reading countless thread here is a K engine is it cost ya around 20k to conver including fitting and accessories require(correct me if im wrong)Quote:
Originally Posted by iceman_vti
what i think best you should do is, since you have a vti (i think is a vtec engine??correct me if im wrong) well instead of a conversion invest in a turbo setup and rebuild, you be happier with the power gain than the K block
I am going to close this thread until you have done some more searching. As others have said, firstly decide on what you want from your car and then look at the best way to get there.
Once you have done some searching PM me and I will reopen the thread for you to ask more questions.
I didn't say they were crap. Inceman_vti said that the only good thing nissan has going at the mo is the Maxima.Quote:
Originally Posted by Spec_R
And at the present time, the RB26DETT and SR20DET do not meet current emission levels. That's why they have the VQ series now. It's not ebout RB and SR not meeting Australian emission levels. They don't even meet Japan's emission levels for 2005.