well it still connects to the strut tower.
lol.
Printable View
well it still connects to the strut tower.
lol.
Cools thanks for that pic, one advice though. Your car needs a clean, i see lots of leaves where the window wipers are lol
What are the different effects that these bars have on the car?
I might go invest on the "Strut bar" :D
^^^dont both do the same shit??
try www.redbook.com.au it shows what accessories/modifications are standard on all cars
no it dosent *dont confuse people even more Mr Honda worker* :pQuote:
Originally Posted by destrukshn
It connects above the strut tower area onto the chassis :)
not my car btw :)Quote:
Originally Posted by DUST
so one makes the chassis more rigid and one prevents the struts from moving?! ive got the type r chassis bar.
That site doesn't say if the chassis brace is standard...Quote:
Originally Posted by sassy_fit_vtit
Quote:
Originally Posted by bennjamin
Either from just connecting to 2 different spot around the same area, wth does it do?Quote:
Originally Posted by destrukshn
One hold the coilovers for what purpose?
One hold the chassis to make it more rigid for better handling?
So the stock DC2 mounting point is defined as "chassis" but 5cm to the right is no longer the chassis? Come on :DQuote:
Originally Posted by bennjamin
Also, it's probably just as false to call a bar connecting the upper shock mounts together as a "strut brace" as it is to call the "chassis brace" a "strut brace". On our double wishbone Honda's, the shock/spring assembly (unlike a "strut" of our lesser favourite suspension design) does not affect suspension geometry, nor is it a structural member bearing any load other than compression - hence why the chassis brace connects to where it does.
Then again, it's all useless semantics. We all know what everyone means when they say it, so why bother arguing.