Not too sure yet on the tail lights but overall it's always nicer to see in the flesh rather than in picture. I need to see with my own eyes before I can judge. Thanks for the pics.
Printable View
Not too sure yet on the tail lights but overall it's always nicer to see in the flesh rather than in picture. I need to see with my own eyes before I can judge. Thanks for the pics.
looks like an aurion
yeah end of july is release date
There seems to be a few cars coming out with the saggy soiled-nappy rear bump look. I wonder if there is some new regulation somewhere in the world (probably USA) that's causing this symptom. Or it could be a misguided Japanese design fad.
is this the same as japanese honda accord as per the current euro?
wait for the sports version to come out with the bodykit that will be a hit!
Some 2009 Acura TSX videos on Youtube:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RAE_VTSKCOU
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S_QxyAX5GgA
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Z9ze2LtVgw
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SQ1Dtc-Z_qw
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h0hw8HkHVqI
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iqg8eAr6ILQ
Remember, our Accord Euro version won't have the ugly grille of the TSX and will have less equipment than the TSX.
Also, the fuel consumptions quoted in the videos are miles per US gallons. US gallons are smaller than Imperial Gallons (3.785 Litres versus 4.54 Litres). So, to convert, multiply quoted figures by 4.85 and divide by 3.785. This gives our version of miles per gallon. Then, the constant number 282.2 divided by the imperial miles per gallon gets you L/100km.
One of the videos claims that the auto will be more economical than the manual but this might just be the bias of the standard test they conduct in the USA.