cant wait too see the pulsar cop the civic
Printable View
cant wait too see the pulsar cop the civic
I think everyone on here knows how much effort, development work and trial/error went into EGK20A. It was a really quick car for a mildly modified K20A.
In reality, it is not about the SSS beating any FWD Civic/Integra/Excel but about pulling the numbers to 'help' backup the power claim, right? With over 270Nm of torque@crankshaft available, it has the potential to pull some very fast times/trap speeds for a N/A FWD.
Hopefully, it will spur on the N/A FWD drag racing scene in Australia, which all of you would agree is a GOOD THING.
No more negative posts until Compak Attak, OK? Feel free to flame me afterwards if we only get a 13.0001! Will let Yonas know asap about being the pilot, talk to you on msn mate.
What is the weight of this so called weapon Nissan I want to work out what mph it should run with the claimed power output.Was there ever a dyno sheet posted up for everyone to see the claimed power output of that egk20a because I still remember it running at a street meet with a std intake manifold on it and they claimed 140 something kw then when it ran the 12.3 it was only a couple of mph faster but they claimed 170+kw then which is outrageous as it would have gone 8 to 12mph faster with that sort of power output.The only difference I seen was it was running slicks & the quad throttle body setup when it ran 12.3 and I think it had drag radials on it at the street meet where it ran 12.8.Please dont get this wrong as I think the times the Civic ran where great and it was a great thing that the JDM yard guys did but the plain truth of it all is mph comes from KW's.
ALLMTR996
The Pulsar has a lot of new parts since its last weigh in, I have no idea what it would weigh these days. Some new parts are lighter than the ones they replaced, other work has made the car heavier. Also had the interior stripped from the B pillars back. I would hazard a guess and say around 2000Lbs(900+Kg) including driver.
For reference, this is a thread on a 200+Hp@wheels SR20VE in the USA.
Dude what does that link have to do with the weight of your car?.With the 900kg car and your claimed power you should run 116 mph + guess we will see at the Compak Attack how much of this is bullshit and how much is real.Quote:
Originally Posted by iamhappy46
ALLMTR996
With that power you claim and 900kgs on slicks 11.9@116mph if you know how to set a FWD chassis up, if it does not run this with your so called special gearing I will torch you with a flame thrower after the Compak Attack.Quote:
Originally Posted by iamhappy46
This power is more than a FACTORY built 2lt Super Tourer engine was making in the late 90's and yes I was the Team Engineer for 3 different brands of these things for 10 years so I do know what they where making.Funny how Online's CRX car comes out and runs 10.98@118.something MPH and yet NO ONE knows or will ever know what power it makes as the ET and MPH speak for themself's.And if you would care to pull your head out of your arse ALLMTR is a ANDRA Sport Compact class and has been one of the best supported class's at the Sport Compact Meetings this last season so dont think that your Nissan streetcar will suddenly spur eveyone on to come racing.
Regards Dyno Dave
Guys ,please,you gotta stop!!!
I gotta know the end to this superb drama series......
Between this thread,Lost,waitin for Miss Chanel to post another pic & waitin for my mounts to arrive from the states,I'm losing my mind :confused:
:honda: ;) :honda: :) :honda: :p :honda: :D :honda: :cool: :honda: :thumbsup: :honda: :angel:
lol@threadQuote:
Originally Posted by CRXer
270Nm at the crank?
sorry... but no, not possible with an na 2.0l.
Dude just wait till after the Compak Attack then we will let the games begin as I have only just started.:pQuote:
Originally Posted by CRXer
Regards Dyno Dave
Quote:
Originally Posted by DynoDave
oh man i cant wait!!!!!!!
FLLAAAAAAAAAAAMAGE
Not possible... yeah, probably not possible for a 2.0L but seeing as this not a 2.0L, it is possible.Quote:
Originally Posted by ginganggooly
Tomei SR22DE power/torque graph, 250+Nm@crankshaft here The VE head is a much better design than the DE head so more torque can be generated with the right tuning/CR/camshafts.
ALLMTR996: The SR20VE thread was relevant to those who question the power potential of any SRxxVE engine. Internally standard SR20VE has 150Kw@wheels.
Also, the SR16VE N1 motor in Japan can easily get 150Kw@wheels with extractors, exhaust, 12.7:1 CR, camshafts, ECU and other support mods. Not bad for a 1.6L!
DynoDave: The SR20DE Touring car engines are nice(with head reversed so the inlet manifold on the front, exhaust on the back right?) but they were limited to a stock crank and 2045cc capacity(from memory)
I am sure that you would agree that if torque could be increased via a longer stroke and using the VE head to optimise a low lobe rpm cam for street duties and hi lobes for higher rpm, that the power output is attainable.
The car will be in Sydney a few days before Compak Attak, your welcome to get your own power/torque figures out of the car, then flame the car then and there if you like.
Also my 'gearing' is not the 'special' part of my gearbox :zip: