Dont know the answer to this but reckon the b16a2 would sound heaps better! :D
Printable View
Dont know the answer to this but reckon the b16a2 would sound heaps better! :D
stock wrxs are slow as shit, they are not made up to what they are, a lightly modified b16a (without a turbo) in a hatch would easily beat a lightly modified wrx running stock boost, EASILY
WRX = SHIT BOX SLOW + ShIT BOX GEAR BOX. And no way would a stock rex put out 160awkw if you think that you are well dreaming
i own a turbo 1.5 civic sedan with 2 15s in the boot running 8psi running around 105fwkw
and i have beatn many wrx's, they are not fast.
Don't you understand Sexc86, it doesn't matter what's real. It's all about what you read about on the internet, heard from a mates mates and numbers.
alright so maybe 160awkw is a bit too much. its about 160 something at the fly.
but WRX's aint slow...dont know what youve been driving..
who knows... i mean people who drive WRX's will probably see civics as a waste of time and fuel therefore would not try to race you. =)
thats fact..
this thread is useless.......
yes, admin please lock it up.
Closed :p
aww no fun guys, i just wanted to no how turbo would go, ive seen ur car around b4 barefootbanzai, well b4 it was dead, sorri hey man but it was nice :)
doesn't matter to me both cars are great!
go race 1 with a slightly modified B16aQuote:
Originally Posted by Sexc86
you'll get your ass raped
a lightly modded EK4 with
exhast/filter upgrade ran neck and neck to a Impreza RS 2.5L
do u own a B16a powered hatch?
getting a eg soon after i sell my ek1