XR6T is nice.. get the blue one, so everyone will slow down next to you thinking you are a cop:)
Printable View
XR6T is nice.. get the blue one, so everyone will slow down next to you thinking you are a cop:)
The only bad thing about the XR6T's are the heavy duty clutch and clunky gearbox...really making me consider an auto version instead!! guess this is quite normal for powerful cars, think i've just been used to the smooth gearboxes and light clutches of honda cars..:P
Yeah it's weird isn't it. I also noticed that the Euro had similar rear legroom to the Corolla when i was in my friend's car. I think since the Euro is designed in Japan it's also designed to accomodate slightly shorter people. I test drove the accord v6 when i was shopping for a car too and it does indeed have a lot more legroom and slightly more power. The Camry has a crazy amount of leg room but too bad it's not good for anything else.Quote:
Originally Posted by aaronng
Considering how much better the Euro handles and looks, i knew instantly which car was the right choice. I'm 180cm myself but i have a longer spine proportionally so that might explain why i'm hitting my head in the rear. At the end of the day it doesn't really matter cause i know very well that i'll never be sitting in the back. ; )
There is one other bad thing about an XR6.
Its a taxi with a turbocharger and it is about as refined as most taxi drivers.
Resale on anything ford is discusting as well.
If you still wanna buy one I was told the new 6 speed is much nicer than the stick through cement 5 speed box.
Is this box available in the turbo or only the GT?
The XR6T is a good car imo but i don't really like the interior. Everything looks too much like a Taxi with squarey edges. But the straight line performance of these cars are excellent. They have very good legroom too.Quote:
Originally Posted by blkeuro
Agree with you on all counts. But its still not enough to stop me from buying it :DQuote:
Originally Posted by euro1978
In terms of resale, doesn't affect me since its a company leased car..
Also it was a mates MKII with the new 6 speed box that I test drove..
Haha, I think my legs are proportionally longer than my spine (not that I look like Urkel), but I hit the seat and not the roof. Oh well... Good thing I'm the driver :DQuote:
Originally Posted by sodaz
I am a fairly tall guy (5' 6.5") and only my youngest son (4 yo) can seat behind me. Euro is ok for family on short trips but would not recommend it for long trips. Better bet may be to go for a Accord V6.
Quote:
Originally Posted by T-onedc2
the GT is a very fast in a straight line but in the handling department it aint too sharp. Aarong the mazda 6 is all about show, the cabin carpet is aweful, the abs brakes are aweful. The auto is aweful. The manual needs an extra gear o wait so does the auto .. :P
"Slightly"? More like ALOT more power. It's chalk and cheese. I have driven both and the V6 Accord is substantially quicker than a 2.4 Euro. And alot torquier too.Quote:
Originally Posted by sodaz
Are you talking 6mt or auto - around corners or in a straight line?Quote:
Originally Posted by Alpine
"Substantially" quicker is a big call - the V6 Accord is no Ferrari.
Throw in some real world driving (eg inc corners) and even the slower auto Euro will not be disgraced by the V6 Accord.
I think it's a good family car. But I don't envy the person who has to sit behind me while I'm driving. Whilst there is enough leg room for kids, adults might find it slightly on the small side.
42k for a Euro L compared to 55k for a GT is a big difference. Wouldn't be happy about shelling out for petrol too especially with prices so inflated. And if they are quoting correct figures, then I would be happy with 9.1L per 100 the Euro is getting. :)