so low resistance is always good for N/A and high restiance for turbo engines ?
Printable View
so low resistance is always good for N/A and high restiance for turbo engines ?
I would say whatever is in your engine stock is best to stay with, but you would see the idling difference issue on an f/i engine LONG before an n/a one. Not sure I've ever seen a built n/a honda engine that needs injectors large enough for the benefit of the low resistance ones to even come into playQuote:
Originally Posted by Snoop_gee
read here... one of my hondatech articals
http://www.hondatech.com.au/forum/showthread.php?t=143
Regards James
Is that one of your articles?Quote:
Originally Posted by BLKCRX
Because I found the exact same article (word for word) on HondaSwap
Quote:
Originally Posted by wynode
No Way. This "pissedoffsol" guy OBVIOUSLY travlled into the future , to the date which James created his hondatech article ( on 11-01-2005, 01:33 AM ) - cut n copied the entire lot -
THEN travelled back to his time , almost 2 years prior ( Jan 28 2004, 04:00 AM) and posted it up.
The efforts some go to ;)
so in other words james "Saturated" means high resistance and "Peak and Hold" is low resistance.
The correct term is IMPEDENCE, not resistance.
um, try 'impedance'Quote:
Originally Posted by ProECU
*sigh*
huh?Quote:
Originally Posted by ProECU
no, i was just correctly correcting your 'correction'
do you have a problem with that?
not with the correction, but your general derogatory tone blows
if you have a problem with my tone, take it up with a mod,
otherwise, try to stick to the topic...
practise what you preach, oh, and yeah, I have reported you on occasion.Quote:
Originally Posted by tinkerbell