yup that 2mm per piston is hardly worth it... from 1590 cc to 1676 cc
hope i got the (PIE/4)x bore 2 x stroke x No of cylinders correct :)
Printable View
yup that 2mm per piston is hardly worth it... from 1590 cc to 1676 cc
hope i got the (PIE/4)x bore 2 x stroke x No of cylinders correct :)
Close, but no cigar...Quote:
Originally Posted by bennjamin
Try this for reference, something I just put togehter...:
http://b16a.kicks-ass.net/ProECU/engine calcs.xls
Parameters need changing to your specific engine details.
NB: Total Swept Volume is the Engine cc's
Amongst other things, this is also a good tool to simulate effect of bore diameter and stroke changes on Swept Volume.
cheers for that - if i had excel etc id open it up and have a peek :)
regardless , I think we can all agree for the money spent , increasing the displacement of a d16a8 or perhaps any D series is a waste of time and money.
I'm with freaky geek on this one. Forget stroking. Strokings for V8's (that's what I reckon anyway). Stroking will probably lose you revs anyway and the best bit about hondas are the revs. If you want displacement increase, bore it. In my overall opinion though, if you want figures, turbo, but if your like me though, go all motor. I like being able to beat V8's without a turbo cause the look on people's faces when they find out there's no pump is classic.