Quest for more Power...

Kris

your turbo sizing is fine mate, believe me.
Also the shape of that power curve raises some questions about fuelling, if you can provide a a/f v rpm graph, it would help us help you.

i think fueling is ok
i have a high flow fuel pump

Maybe i need a fuel pressure regulator

by fuelling I meant the shape of the fuel tables.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ProECU

wasnt pornstar a convicted malaysian drug mule ?

---

So are you going to tell us what your stock run was?

What mph did you run on the quarter mile?

PROecu can you state what the base run was or try to help out - rather than hit in with silly little comments k.

I can state it, but it's my given right to choose not to.
It's irrelevant to Kris_ issues.

I suggest you take a lesson in moderation.

Keep it on topic guys!

i dont have an AF Map

Kris,
you could always do this if you wanted more help on diagnosis.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by LVNIT

Kris the wideband you have in the car can datalog, i think i gave you the cables to datalog with, you can set it up so a laptop records your a/f ratios at a given rpm :)

---

I think the 'problem' is quite clear. You have only 6psi at redline :/

Look at getting a better boost controller, and make sure that ur cat still flows.

edit:
I want to also make note that this dyno is not done in shootout. Therefor it has even less relevance then before. Im guessing you are making around 120kw peak atm on that boost level.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by string

Really?

180kw @ 8psi = 7.99kw / pound.
190kw @ 9psi = 8.08kw / pound.

Again, i'm not seeing the problem? How do we know the type-r hasn't been tuned far more conservatively? It does have a much higher compression afterall.

---

This isnt the math that everyone is laughing at, its

160kW @ 4psi = 20kw / psi (10.5:1 ~80kw stock, which is generous!!)

through a 1.75" exhaust

compared to
199kw @ 9psi = 12kW / psi (11.2:1 ~90kw stock, which is generous!!)

through a 3" exhaust and a turbo which flows ~10lb min more.

my stock d-series went
120kW @ 8.5psi = 7kW / psi (9.2:1 60kW stock)

through a 2.5" exhaust and a turbo which flows less then any of the above

I guess we all need a MPH to settle this argument! ;)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Weq

This isnt the math that everyone is laughing at, its

160kW @ 4psi = 20kw / psi (10.5:1 ~80kw stock, which is generous!!)

through a 1.75" exhaust

compared to
199kw @ 9psi = 12kW / psi (11.2:1 ~90kw stock, which is generous!!)

through a 3" exhaust and a turbo which flows ~10lb min more.

my stock d-series went
120kW @ 8.5psi = 7kW / psi (9.2:1 60kW stock)

through a 2.5" exhaust and a turbo which flows less then any of the above

I guess we all need a MPH to settle this argument! ;)

---

Plus one has 200cc more capacity than the other. I was merely making a point :)

But I do agree, 8psi and 180kw is fantastic. Personally I don't care if it's true or not, but a lot of people love to jump whenever there is a chance of something even slightly exagerated, even to make a point.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Weq

160kW @ 4psi = 20kw / psi (10.5:1 ~80kw stock, which is generous!!)
through a 1.75" exhaust

---

erm, since when does a stock b16 only make 80kW@wheels, and I think you are also misinformed on the CR of the said motor...

http://www.ozhonda.com/forum/showthr...light=dyno+day
Post#8

Bumpy1
Civic EM1 B16A2
Best run 96.8 kw @ 7747k rpm
308nm@ 119km/h

John ECU-MAN
97 CRX jdm ecu
Best run 95.kw @ 7769rpm
302nm@120km/h

97 CRX B16A2
John ECU-MAN audm ecu pod
Best run 95.3.kw @ 7769rpm
302nm@120km/h

97 CRX B16A2
John ECU-MAN audm ecu
Best run 93.3.kw @ 7769rpm
302nm@120km/h

Please don't continue posting misinformation.

Thanks