Lies!
Printable View
What happened to this proposal? Still thinking about it are we?
Never mind, like most ideas and proposals in this section of the forum, it has fallen of deaf ears.
Guess i'll just keep sifting through 'EG Springs fit EK4?' & 'We just may get the JDM CTR in Australia.'
You lot are absolute bollocks.
yes, and u just called him a 2yo sook :confused:Quote:
Originally Posted by Q_ball
if you dont want someone to respond then don't provoke them.
and it's fair enough for him to ask the question without being called a sook. the last thread reply was over 2 months ago. we have had no updates or results from the mod team.
Relax Steer^Gimic and Q_ball.
"We" as moderators have had other priorities with this website IE modding , and the big boss that instates the actual change has a full time job so its alittle hard sometimes with some things. Hang in there guys ! IT will happen soon.
That's fine bennjammin. A little update to show that you guys are still considering it instead of leaving this thread go to die is all you have to do.
Understand that you guys have better stuff to do then run this site.
*bennjamin edit no need :)*
Steer^Gimic , the actual current status of this and others to do , is in a "to do list" in the mod section. We simply bump it up , like you are and add any thoughts and hopefully Wynode gets around to it. Hang in there.
Hoping to catchup on all the overdue work tomorrow......so hang in there ppl.
sorry for the delay in getting back to everyone.......but we're just deciding on how to categorise things........looking at possibly two sub-categories atm.
Almost there.......just deciding on the forum name and description. There will be two (2) forums......one for Pre 2000 models and one for post 2000 models. We didn't want to split it up anymore than that because then it gets confusing.
sounds dumb to have a pre2k and post2k sections
should group them by similar generations
Why is it dumb ?
All EK and below share majority same engine/mounts/wiring/tech etc.
ED/EF/EG/EK
All latter are a newer generation and share similar parts.
Instead of criticizing how about you suggest what a title/s could be.
Cool, some progress :)
IMO i probably still would have sectioned into model category e.g:
EF/ED/CRX
EG/EJ/DELSOL/EK
DC2/DC5
or whatever may be the case. BUT i still think dividing the categories into basically new and old is still ok because that's where the main confusion was. Having more specific sub-categories results in members paying more attention to specific types. Members paying more attention results in more accurate and relevant info IMO.
But glad it's gotten somewhere :)