Umm.. you can get pretty much any engine component you want aftermarket... if you look hard for it, and you have sufficient capital outlay...Quote:
Originally Posted by DR HONDA
If my car ever arrives I'll post up a nice H22 graph for you
Printable View
Umm.. you can get pretty much any engine component you want aftermarket... if you look hard for it, and you have sufficient capital outlay...Quote:
Originally Posted by DR HONDA
If my car ever arrives I'll post up a nice H22 graph for you
Engine - b18c7
Displacement - Stock
Bore - Stock
Stroke - Stock
CR - Stock
Camshaft - Stock
Camgear Settings - Stock
VTEC X-Over - 5800
Gearbox - S80 ITR 4.785 (Stock)
I/H/E -Plazmaman CAI/5zigen Headers/2.5inch Mandrel bent exhaust.
ECU - Hondata S200 (Tuned by Adrian From TODA Racing)
Comments: Red Line was a completely Stock b18c7 Engine... Blue line is after adding H/E + Tuning
http://img30.imageshack.us/img30/4425/louieegb18c7k.jpg
^^^was that mitchells car?
weird set of road speeds for 3rd gear 4.7 box,more like a 4.4........
was the before on stock ecu or s200 with previous tune?
na not my car jase,
the car did have the s200 but only had a base tune
yea its got the 4.7 ratio, it looks weird cause of his coilovers
what u guys got a EGc7s200 club going out your way or somethin?
just goes to show how conservative the hondata base maps are
still reckon its a 4.4 though,was he running out to 9+krpm or 19" wheels or similar?
na its cause of his coilovers!
its a 4.7 gearbox and all runs were in 4th gear.
Engine - B18C7
Displacement - 1.8L
Bore - Standard
Stroke - Standard
CR - 12.5:1
Camshaft - Skunk 2 Pro 3
Camgear Settings - Standard
VTEC X-Over - 6,500
Gearbox - Standard
I/H/E -Standard/5zigen/Ebay 2.5"
ECU - S300
http://s137.photobucket.com/albums/q...enghe/dyno.jpg
I would like to receive comments. thanks.
Since you asked for comments, i reckon its a poor effort. Bad combo of parts and a standard motor with bolt-ons will make more power than your motor with less CR and less agressive camsQuote:
Originally Posted by pengpeng
I reckon you need to rethink about the engine combo and go from there. This is a good example of more CR and bigger CAMS not working well together. Remember its the combo of parts used!
Hope i didnt sound to mean
I would have thought that those skunk2 pro3 cams would carry torque well over 9k rpm
skunk2 pro 3 will work with like a 85mm x 95mm (2.2L) high comp with extensive head work.
Not a bad effort with the above dyno graph.
Normally see them being used with 13.5+ compression as wellQuote:
Originally Posted by fatboyz39
http://forums.evans-tuning.com/viewt...t=4558&p=25543
http://forums.evans-tuning.com/viewt...t=3787&p=22826