not really, just slip the clutch, box wont break but your clutch wont last very long if you do it too often :DQuote:
Originally Posted by VTEC16
Printable View
not really, just slip the clutch, box wont break but your clutch wont last very long if you do it too often :DQuote:
Originally Posted by VTEC16
everyone saying... s2k from non biased opinion here?
:p
VW Bug for sure
This is funny.
I know this is a Honda forum and all... but....
If these three cars were racing on a mountain pass "TOO GAY" style, with identical drivers, then of course the EVO would have it all over the other two cars.
now... stop watching initial D! :P
i reakon the wrx would win for sure, better handleing with all for wheels driving. I work for honda and found that the S2 is very lite in the rear.
i want the s2k to win.
No idea on the track actually... but yeah, GO VTEC :)
I think the race would be more between the sti and the evo....the s2000 is just not gonna threaten those two....in my opinion, i think the sti will win...
Understeer is your enemy :)
HAHA this thread is a joke, i mean the s2k is a great car and id love to have one, but reality check people.
THE EVO WILL WIN.
All this talk of amuse s2k this and amuse s2k is stupid, yes its an awesome and quick car as is the 3litre nsx which won another round of touge battles.
But really how can you compare modified cars?
its just a battle of who has spent the most money, or who has the better tuning house and driver...
If you want to accurately compare cars like that they need to be stock, and when stock the evo is much better package outa the box than the honda or suby. Simple.
Why Evo better? Latest STI is nearly .5secs quicker 0-100 then latest evo....
As much as i love Hondas, there is not subsitute for a turbo rush and the gains achieved compared to N/A .....very close call but i think the EVO would win....there handling is a tad better than the STI
And what, that translates to better cornering???Quote:
Originally Posted by IRI