how far will NA go??

put a GTR against a the new lambo´s or a Enzo ferrari. both them are NA and would kill the gtr anny day. but then again to upgrade a lambo or ferrari is virtually inpossible for us ppl. a lambo (new 1s wif weired name) does arround 320kph a skyline does round 260kph (stock)
In handleing the Lambo goes better.
its got a better power delivery because its RWD and doesnt have to pass the power through all 4wheels like d skyline.

in overall i think N/A is better.

the engines are more reliable.
And have does have turbo but its not petrol its diesel.

sorry if u guys didnt understand my english isnt as good as 5years ago.

Quote:

---

Sorry dude but if it had NOS it is FI not N/A.

---

Its still an NA engine... and reguardless it ran low 12's without it. His gemmy does low 12s... not to mention another friends dads car runs high 12s stock... damn AC cobra's ;) NA clubmans would be doing stupid times with the S2000 engine in there.

bottom line... it depends on the car, and the aplication. In the end the fastest cars are FI :P but they never see the road. So again it comes down to aplication. And what YOU want. but sinces its a debate about the bottom line... a combustion engine sucks anyway, why use that when you can use jet turbines? Where do you draw the line :P

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Sushi

In handleing the Lambo goes better.
its got a better power delivery because its RWD and doesnt have to pass the power through all 4wheels like d skyline.

in overall i think N/A is better.

the engines are more reliable.
And have does have turbo but its not petrol its diesel.

---

If you are talking about the Murcielago or Gallardo, both are 4WD. Hell even a lot/most of the Diablo's were 4WD.

All i see in this thread is comparing apples with oranges :)

yeha
lambos are 4ws..howevre the 4wd only kicks in when the rear starts to slip

other than that..iuts mainly a RWD

i think this thread got sidetracked somewhere. . . how far would NA go, i was refering to street practical applications. . . its no good talking about NA F1, ferraris and lambo, since 98% of us will never get the chance to get behind the wheel of them

'street application' defined as - not slick tyres, has to be roadworthy to some degree, stop start @ lights, some highway touge and day to day driving etc. . .

but i think i got my answer. . having a full NA car would not be as cost effective as a turbo, but it would be more reliable. by cost effective, i mean bolting on a turbo as compared to rebuilding the NA. i think thats y there are so many turbo cars out there. . . as for driveability NA would probably win hands down, but i think the layout (ff/fr/mr/awd) might have some effect for street. . .

if i had a choice between a stock s14/15 and a stock ITR and had about $15-20k for mods, i still would get the ITR and go the NA path. . . just to be different

Hell yeah :P more fun to drive... Just put your car on a strict diet. You'll spend a bit there though :P

if i had a choice between a stock s14/15 and a stock ITR and had about $15-20k for mods, i still would get the ITR and go the NA path. . . just to be different[/quote]


not different... its an honorable path to take... :) some might consider it the high road...

hey i got s 97 cxi.. i dropped a vtec box into it last week and iv noticed alott more top end with my car.. i lined up agianst a VL holden calis and chopped him by about half a car length. :> topping out at about 150kmp/h in 3rd before body roll got hte better of me around the bend and had to back off :) go d hondaz!

why dont everyone get back to basic,

lets compare washing machine, they come in turbo and NA aswell !
i got a LG turbo, and my clothes are clean as, only takes 30mins !

LOL me too.... bought it about 4 weeks ago!

Turbo drum technology! Drool!

"Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm I can feel the 4 different fabric softeners"! :D

OMG Speedcore and EXIT needs to stop sniffing the washing liquid!!

HAHAH