Quote:
Originally Posted by [[d a n n y]]
Printable View
Quote:
Originally Posted by [[d a n n y]]
What power does the EGK20A put down anyway? In kw?
I mean, individual throttle bodies isn't really a "basic" mod...
And sure 86 X 86 is the same as a K20A but I was putting it into a year perspective. SR20 still has 10+ years over a K20A.
None the less, 13.2 quarter mile in the pulsar Vs 12.3 in the civic.
Take into account the weight difference, slicks Vs 18" Nankang tyres, and for sure the pulsar would have much taller gears than the civic. I mean just put those 18s on the civic and it would get a similar time anyway
I just don't see why people as so quick to be so defensive on Honda's behalf and demean Nissan so quickly. Honda's are great but Nissan pisses on Honda when it comes to straight line performance and I don't think you guys can handle that. I'm not saying all of you but I read some comments on Nissan being sh!t and I don't see how you guys can say that. I prefer Honda over Nissan as well, and with all honesty I am not a fan of Nissan and do think their cars are over rated but I would never put such comments down for the owner of this Nissan to read after he did such a great job.
I for one congratulate the effort of this Nissan owner and let him know I am extremely impressed with the car and respect his efforts.
Also who built the engine? Especially the cams etc?
and 200kw atw from a SR20DE is easy to believe! hmmm :rolleyes:Quote:
Originally Posted by b13nx
I think you forgot to add the little "IMO" after that. If you really think about it, compare apples with apples, NA vs NA, Honda > Nissan. IMO!:)Quote:
Originally Posted by spetz
well since it's a overall better carQuote:
Originally Posted by dc4t
that's why it's held it's value.
fast is only 1 thing it's better
it's got better handling.
better creature comfort.
better in any ways well should i say except for the fuel consumption.
I have a Pulsar VZ-R SR16VE race box that was built for a JDM race car, the owner wrote the car off at the track prior to fitment and I picked it up really cheap. Changing gears at 9,600rpm and the next gear engages at 7200rpm.Quote:
Originally Posted by spetz
I had the engine prep'd by a local, my Dad(an ex-bathurst driver and qualified mechanic) and I performed the original engine assembly. I was responsible for tuning it but was limited by factory AFM and the ECU I was using. 142Kw@treads was the 13.24second quarter. Since then, I have had some problems mechanically and also with my left ankle(broken) so not been to the track since. The engine has been freshened up with new billet cams to suit the engine and gearbox(best power between 7000 and 9600rpm), some other smal changes and a new ECU to run the ITB's. 201KW@treads is the new baseline and I am FULLY aware that there is more power in it, even with 98 octance pump fuel.
Check the first post: 13.24@103mph = 142Kw@treadsQuote:
Originally Posted by online
Everbody else:
91mm stroke x 86.5mm bore(oversize factory pistons) = 2124cc
The motor is running Nissan engine components except for Crank, big end bearings, camshafts and valve springs...
I have a video of the SSS doing a 0~180Km/h sprint which will show you what your all dealing with ;) Post a link up when it finishes uploading.
-- -- --
Vids of a STANDARD Nissan X-Trail GT
CVT Auto in 2nd Gear
http://www.users.on.net/~noelsilv/au...rail_GT_2.mpeg
CVT Auto in Drive
http://www.users.on.net/~noelsilv/au...rail_GT_D.mpeg
Notice in drive it does the 0~100Km/h sprint in under 6 seconds
[QUOTE=spetz]Honda's are great but Nissan pisses on Honda when it comes to straight line performance and I don't think you guys can handle that.[QUOTE]
omg ur a knob.. yes a BOOSTED nissan pisses on honda in straight line, but a N/A nissan has no chance..
Bolt on mod;) EGK20A was unopened, imagine what it could have done with some new internals etc:)Quote:
Originally Posted by spetz
I guess every Honda owners excuse is that it has no turbo...
But in the end of the day both Nissan and Honda are a japanese car and are competitors. Why are people so quick to point out that Nissan is quicker because it has a turbo, but when an NA honda is quicker than another NA car, it means Honda is the best and any other car is sh!t? A lot of you guys, and I am not saying everyone, but a lot really have your mind made up and nothing can change it. Whatever helps you guys sleep with your Honda in the garage...
iamhappy46,
Who did the cams? Your dad as well? How did you guys figure out what spec cams are the best to put in? And how is the car around the city? When do the cams swap over from low to high?
Pillow,
Yeah, quad throttles are a bolt on mod but in almost all cases it needs a full standalone ECU, and quads aren't good for street driving. Surely it can be driven on the street but it's the kind of mod that is making the car closer to a race car. And if this nissan has quad TB's on top of it's 201kw atw it will be a monster! Not that it isn't already...
In the end of the day all I am trying to say is that there really is no need for people to diss iamhappy's car just because it's not a Honda
Quote:
Originally Posted by spetz
lol dude noone said honda was the best.. the reason ppl love honda is bcoz.. for wat they r, they are frieken quick. awesome built engines that put out good power and offer awesome fuel efficiency. that is all. u gotta rememeber ur on a honda forum so of course everyones gona stick up for honda so u puttin honda down doesnt get u anywhere
You're on a Honda forum Spetz...what the **** do you expect? Sure quads aren't really for street driving (they can be with an airbox enclosing them) but the car already had a 'standalone' ecu, so it's not a major omg mod such as new internals;) Side by side, look at which one has more work, and purely for that reason, the Pulsar will probably be quicker. Like someone else in thread has already said - Apples and Oranges my friend, the only things common to both these cars is 2L, FWD and No Turbo lol.
:) :)
woahhh so much rubbish in this thread.. its funny.. b20 vs k20 vs sr20 vs 350z vs b16 vs SSS vs honda vs nissan vs na vs turbo vs CA18T