hope all goes well both of u
Printable View
hope all goes well both of u
You don't know anything about the Mazda3, so your comments don't hold water.Quote:
Originally Posted by IAMVTEC
The Mazda 3 was in my top 3 cars when I was looking around (Civic vs Astra vs 3) and I didn't go for the 3 because while it was a decent drive the level sof equipmnent you get in the base model 3 is far inferior to the Civic, you don't even get power windows in a 3!
ya, i agree as wellQuote:
Originally Posted by Scratch2k
Far inferior? $600 gets you the power pack that includes everything the Civic has minus cruise control, but gains an aux input. An extra $2000 gets you the safety pack that includes side and curtain airbags, stability control and traction control. So for a cheaper price than the VTiL, you get the same number of airbags as the Sport plus DSC and TC. But somehow, its far inferior...Quote:
Originally Posted by Scratch2k
I got quotes on a Mazda3 and Civic with exactly the same specification. The Mazda3 was $1350 more.Quote:
Originally Posted by IS250
well, initally before i bought my civic vti, i was looking between corolla, yaris sedan, mazda 3 and nissan pulsar ST-L
then nissan pulsar changed to tilda which i don't like.
corolla then too common, no point getting
yaris is decent for the price, but looks crap too.
that left with mazda3, but things getting funny with it. initally i like 3 a lot, sexy and in fasion, but the more i look at it, the more ugly it gets.
man, now i totally dislike mazda 3 (the shape at least), and i am just glad i got my civic.
hug my civic;) :love: :car: :honda: :thumbsup:
i narrowed my choices down to the 3, the focus and the civic. the focus was first to go on styling and interior quality (cheap). i was looking at base models only (VTi, Neo, CL).
i chose the civic for ABS (should be standard on all cars), power windows, cruise control, mp3 and interior quality. the 3 goes a bit better. styling was about on par. its getting hard to find a bad small car nowadays.
In my point of view, civic would be the best choice in thoes range, and base of its respectaion, it worths us to invest $$ to get.
i reckon the only reason someone wouldnt get the civic is coz of the wait n service fees and rude dealers from artarmon
the wait was also a factor but so was the fact that the 3 was in runout and therefore an older model
Your dealer must've been trying to rip you off. The Mazda3 should only be $610 more expensive for the exact same specs minus cruise control, not an option on the 3 unless you get it dealer fitted.Quote:
Originally Posted by Chaz
Is there any difference in waiting times between the auto and manual Civics? Thinking of getting a manual Civic at the end of the year.