Yes, only beneficial with more serious mods and higher redline, if you read my first post, I explained most of the tests performed..
Here's more Dynographs...
This is the latest one from Havoc's Dyno Day last month..
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v1...0/146Webii.jpg
Old graph... Showing stock output from many years ago...
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v1...Dyno_Webii.jpg
nice nice Nick! that's almost 50% increase!
how did you find the teins? hehe
Is your dip from 4500rpm to 5500rpm just because you were limited to 25 VTC?
might be because of the VTEC point aswell?Quote:
Originally Posted by integral90
VTEC point at 4500rpm seems too early... The power/torque curve hasn't even started to drop at 4500rpm. Might be wise to try 5000rpm for drivability. Won't affect peak power though.
what cams are they again??
Says all the mods on the dyno graph down the bottom. Skunk2 S2 :DQuote:
Originally Posted by johnprocter
lol fxck i really need glasses lol.
Just rethinking this, I don't know the tuning parameters of the Ultimate... but seeing as the whole air speed and velocity changes from the RBC I think a lot of the torque loss is just in the ECU not knowing how to capitalise, not the actual design of the RBC.Quote:
Originally Posted by Kason
From what I saw with Darren's car, he made good torque even with his mid-level headers, intake and restrictive catback. Seeing as there's so much power in an engine like the K24 in tuning, you might as well give the RBC a try. If you could retain the stock torque up until about 4500rpm then surpass it after that then you're ahead in my opinion. From your sig you seem to be a bit of a track whore, and on Wakey there isn't a place where you'll drop below 5000rpm in 2nd :)
Also from my recent experience, RBC matched with flywheel is pretty potent stuff. I run my tyres on 32psi and the car is 50/50 on whether it spins in 1st from a rolling punch. If you could do your flywheel + RBC + tune I think you'd see impressive results in a real life situation.