Second that, I think the new Honda Jazz shape looks quite nice but i believe the old shape is better value for money !!!
Printable View
Agreed the Jazz has been let down by the greed of Honda Australia and it is overpriced , however when it comes to re-sale value it will beat the Ford and most other cars hands down :wave:
This is our 3rd Jazz , the 1st one i sold for $2000 above my payout figure , the second one i could have sold it for $1700 above my payout figure but decided to keep it for one of my sons :)
So i cannot praise the Jazz more when it comes to keeping its re-sale value , other cars are cheaper to buy but their resale value plummets after 3 years to next to nil :thumbdwn:
Cheers
Michael
ya, resale price is one of selling point for Jazz, and this is reason why ppl choose honda over other brands, so just pick your own choice when u in the market.
hm.... my fren had a vtis jazz for 3.5 years, bought for around $25k when it was just released and sold for $15k. 10k in 3.5 years.... is this considered good compared with other makes and models??
i believe its the same as the current model. i do also think that the jazz is expensive for a small car...
i used to be able to justify paying abit more for a honda than its rivals, mind u i had 2 gd3 before.. both built in japan,, but i can't justify doing it for a thailand built...
but the disc brake and new engine are indeed temping :(
I think the location not affect the quality, own Thailand made's 8th civic and new accord, and they are all good quality.
location has no way affected quality, if people here know honda (and i should hope they do) then they would know that honda tries to be the name known for quality, they are incredibly stringint on wat is put out there and are miticulous in there checking and maintaining of standards, no matter where it is produced
Ya, and better features of new FIT(Jazz here) which made by Guangzhou compare to ours, damn