s2000 vs Evo6 vs Sti

does any one hav the stats for these cars ??
0-100km/h how many secs ??
dat shuld giv us a good idea at least on paper which shuld win but always depends on d driver

Evo By Miles

1st Evo
2nd Sti
3rd S2K

omg, IMO power isn't so important in this battle.
It's good brakes, balanced car.
EVO & STI are good, but not uited to this battle.
I've seen on a video clip that an S2K took it to a ferarri on the track.
In the end EVO is based on a supermarket shopping trolley..... just tarted up to the max. Motor magazine gave the impression that they found the limit of the EVO in PCOTY & the other good cars surpassed it. It's good but not the best.
I think the S2K is the right tool for this job.
STi?
just crap:D

I like [[d a n n y]]'s oppinion

Get ureself a copy of BMI or hot version (dvd), they test all three cars on a bit of mountain (touge),all cars are tunned by japanese garages, boss,Amuse,signal auto,and the s2000 gets the better sector time. so its proven on tight twists and even in other circumstances ie: gymkhana, the s2000 reigns over the AWD kings. Check it out

Yes I agree with WhiteAP1. On a touge the S2000 will rule simply due to the lower weight and flexibility of S2000's handling as well as its RWD platform.
But the EVO won't be far behind indeed, its still there.
Hell, on a downward slope, I'd say the Civic Type R and AE86 can match the speeds.
But on a uphill touge, the EVO will disappear after the first corner, and S2000 will never see it again.

And on a normal circuit there is no doubt, the EVOs and STi will be way way way out infront, especially with the traction as well as mid-range torque out of the corners. On tsukuba circuit, the potential of the EVO and STIs is around 5 seconds per lap more than the S2000. They're not even in the same league (not group).

The other thing to remember is that on a none touge run, where you're limited to only 1 driving lane - the AWD's will always fare better as well within the markings. RWD cars need around 1.5-2.0 racing lanes to fully utilise their potential, as they can lose rear traction and the tail slide out too easily when on the limit, although this doesn't mean its not fast as it is a completely diff way of driving - its just that it takes up more laneways.

i reackon it depends on the driver....if they were all the same drivers, i reackon either the sti or evo would win

Don't use the Amuse Orange AP1 S2000 or their GT1, thats just plain BS. If you wanted Aussie Spec (meaning not the Hero version you can get in Japan) I'd still say its a race between the EVO and the STi.

But which model EVO and STi? If you want to compare the EVO 6 T.M.E, grab the 22B WRX STi but then these both are 'tweaked' (correct me if I'm wrong on this). The performance gap between the EVO and WRX is obvious, the EVO packing a ton of tech with it like that Active Yaw Control, etc. The difference is shown right at the limit, the WRX you'd think twice where as the EVO would keep to that line and you'll keep piling on the speed (metaphroically speaking of course)

If you compare the latest models, the WRX catches up with Subaru giving more in performance features. But the EVO IX has improved close to the limit of the car. With a 2L Mivec (making the power delivery nicer to use than a big wallop you experience in previous EVOs) and a host of other goodies, I think the EVO IX will still edge out the WRX though its getting ridiculously close its not funny.

Note: The Amuse S2000 and the J's S2000 have both beaten Keiichi Tsuchiya's AE86 hands down. J's S2000 in the street tune class has beaten the Amuse S2000.

Ure not wrong dreadangel evo and sti are great cars, but i cant agree on leaving the s2000 out all together, maybe in a straight line contest, but on twisties.

now by the time u make mods to the s2000 ure losing the jap spec gains anyway, yes stock for stock jap spec is a touch quicker, but with remaping and such there both easily bought to par, there both F20C's, fill up with some octane additive and ure there.its a matter of matching RON. Same goes for evo and sti, jap specs are quicker, so in fact its a reasonable comparison. Jap spec vs jap should be the same as Aus spec vs Aus spec.Same amount of detuning.

Both evo and sti are great cars, shit loads of tourque, with great throttle response, but for twisties not the best. (in my opinion as ive driven all 3 round black spur)

Evo and sti are based on a four door sedans, an econo getaround car(lancer & impreza).The s2000 is a one off engine and chasis biult for such a purpose,its not a sedan with an added turbo, ecu and suspension, its a one off performance vehcile. Buy the time the evo and sti decided if there going to understeer or oversteer, the s2000 with its 50/50 weight distribution and low centre of gravity and about another 100 specifically designed engeneering marvels, such as the engine mounted behind the front axel, and standard sway bars thicker than most aftermarket ones,this TRACK built car will be through the corner ready for the next. IMO

And as uve siad ureself j's racing has beaten the Amuse, it still has the fastest sector time, the only car to break into the 13' sec mark. looks like an s2000 to me

evo or sti

evo hands down