It is with much pleasure that this thread has outnumberd any threads on the front page of this section... it's done this only in a matter of days! WOW
It is with much pleasure that this thread has outnumberd any threads on the front page of this section... it's done this only in a matter of days! WOW
Of course you're entitled to an opinion, but why do you feel the need to call other peoples' cars shyteboxes as you so eloquently put it?Quote:
Originally Posted by hondaskywalker
Please, find me one post that makes the claim that new is definitely better than old. Most people have conceded that the V6-L is in fact a smoother and quieter ride than the Euro. Two different cars for two different purposes, one was made to be a highway cruiser and the other for having fun in the mountains. You're the one who keeps making the reference that because the V6-L costs over $50K, that it is a better car than the Euro when in actual fact it was always seen as being overpriced while even the Euro Luxury is seen as being good value.Quote:
A lot of you out there feel that new is better...this is going off the rail about, but any ever driven a 1997-1998 Honda Prelude? Damn, it's much more smoother, looks better and rides far better than the last 2000 model!
So you've conceded that the V6-L isn't the best Honda?Quote:
That's it... anyone that believes the 1998 Honda Accord V6-L is amongst ONE OF THE BEST vehicles that Honda has produced thus far - please raise your hand!!
Sky
you said earlier that your wife owns the euro...make up your mind dude.
Quote:
Originally Posted by hondaskywalker
this is due primarily to your ignorance, and inability to either understand, or acknowledge what the people on this forum are saying.
Couldn't be bothered reading 8 pages of posts, just wondering if anyone brought up the chronic V6 Transmission problem that plagued V6 Accords from 1998 till about 2001.
There were major problems with that tranny which would suggest its not the best
For god's sake, please stop using a trail of full-stops after each and every sentence. It's very obvious from what you have posted that you have absolutely no knowledge about cars. Therefore, all you can come up with is purely subjective opinions, which I might add, are totally inaccurate at the same time. I don't care if you think Accord V6 is a great looking car because what's attractive to you may not be attractive to me. However, I have a huge problem when you start pulling crap out of your hind-side and claim that Accord V6 is better handling, Euro's wheel wobbles and other numerous gibberish you posted here.
I for one don't think Euro is a perfect car, which is why it made its way to a WRX. The throttle is way too touchy and sensitive, which makes it very unpleasant to drive around the car park. There were some annoying rattles, my suspension bolt came loose once and started making knocking noise and some other minor stuff I cannot remember.
However, I am 100% sure it's a much more superior car compared to Accord V6.
Man you guys are so mean! Can't a guy fall in love with his Accord just because it's older - you guys are "AGES"! LOL
If it makes any of you feel better... sorry, but even if you bash the shyte out of me, I still think the 1998 Honda Accord V6-L is by far the best vehicle Honda has ever created.
http://www.motorsm.com/aus/cars/used...s/SDR041_s.jpg
Here's the King of Honda vehicles!
that looks shit.
Quote:
Originally Posted by hondaskywalker
:eek: :eek: :eek:
You have to be kidding!!!
lol this is all going no where. someone close this thread before things go out of control
LukeSkyWalker obviously prefers the V6-L and thats his opinion. Some people prefer the original VW Beetle over the new one, and thats their opinion. Many of us here prefer the Euro over any other Accord and thats our opinion. There is no use battling over what we all prefer to drive.
No, this is the king of all honda vehicles ;)
http://66.49.200.226/inc/05/bar007.jpg