Every other manufacturer is using it now. Why is Honda so stubborn on this. Are they just going to keep putting out na 4 cylinder cars all our lives?
Printable View
Every other manufacturer is using it now. Why is Honda so stubborn on this. Are they just going to keep putting out na 4 cylinder cars all our lives?
they don't need it.
lol
hahahahaha.
why is the grass green ?
its the other way around....
Honda is the first to develop the lift...
more power without turbo....
honda is more advanced
more power without turbo?Quote:
Originally Posted by |N|
lol
ahahhaha
there's more power with turbo.
Honda does have a turbo powered car?
It might not be available in aus but it's still a turbo and it's current as well, not some car from distant history (ie Honda City Turbo).
Search for the Honda RDX, 2.3L Turbo
Honda, or i should say Acura does have factory turbo engine which is the new RDX.. 2.4 liter vtec turbo!
dolma.. as in more power then traditional NAQuote:
Originally Posted by destrukshn
lol cause honda got vtec lol its like 2psi of boost:P:P
Every other forum is sick of him now. Why is IAMVTEC so stubborn on this. Is he just going to keep putting out shit threads all our lives?Quote:
Originally Posted by IAMVTEC
i get it now... you must be one of the moderators right? every forum i'm on has one... one of these accounts that psot for entertainment value...Quote:
Originally Posted by IAMVTEC
like seriously you own a honda and imply vtec in your name and don't understand the goals and market for specific cars this company makes?
oh btw bmw developed variable valve timing and lift before honda... being the japs they innovated and enhanced using existing technology.
oh btw bmw developed variable valve timing and lift before honda... being the japs they innovated and enhanced using existing technology.[/QUOTE]
:thumbsup: