Printable View
http://www.twinturbov8.com/dynostuff.htm
have a look at this article.
I cant vouch for its acurracy obvioiusly, but from the way the author has written the article it doesnt seem like a "bragging rights" article
Just thought it'd be interesting and useful (if accurate) to put to rest all those arguments as to whether USA dynos really read more HP than ours and what (as a general rule of thumb) we lose through our drivetrains
The article is writtin by Todd Wilks who is no longer with us,those figures are very close to what ALLMTR996 put up in another thread a few weeks ago. And it is what I have been telling you guys for the last 2 years.Aussie dyno's read real power at the wheels not only a 5-9% loss.Rule of thumb is that if an engine makes 160kw at the flywheel it will make 160hp ATW (119.38kw) on a Dyno Dynamics dyno but I know most on here like KW readings.Quote:
Originally Posted by **Ghost**
Regards Dyno Dave
so the article is accurate if i'm not reading dave's words wrong?
Alright i'm shakey in mathematics, but
if
%Loss x 160kw = 119.38kw at wheels
this means
the "rule of thumb" % loss = 1- (119.38/160) = 25% (rounding up)
so using this as an example
in other words a stock b16a (which everyone is so obsessed about) in from factory specs shoudl be putting out
118 flyheel figure x 0.75 = 88.5 kw at wheels
in my personal experience this is accurate as i dyno'd 89.9 kw at wheels when my car was stock except for a intake box
So there you go another good piece of information the way this forums going these days I will not have to say anything anymore.:DQuote:
Originally Posted by **Ghost**
Regards Dyno Dave
lol @ dave making himself more obselete bit by bit :P
Just to clarify things above though... we have
1. The Article by the late Todd Wilks (which is reliable if i'm reading Dave's word's right)
2. The opinion of our becoming obsolete dyno-guy, who has been dyno-ing for 10 yrs? (was it 10yrs or 15 i cant remember u mentioned it somehwere)
3. My personal dyno run with stock B16a + intake "proving" the formula
Since all 3 above reference to AUSTRALIAN DYNO DYNAMICS type DYNOS... is it reasonable in EVERYONE"s opinion here we should sticky this and get ppl to read this b4 they ask "What does my engine pull at the flywheel?" or "y did i only make xxKW" or "y did USA car with same mods and lower octane fuel pull more than my car"?
just a caveat on this info... its a RULE OF THUMB... not designed to be 100% accurate.
if you are absolutely pedantic you need to take out ur engine and do a engine dyno :P
I concour with all this.
But be weary of DD dyno's im america, they have been 'calibrated' for american standards :)
alot of tuners here use the roller dynos... but not many use the dynapacks.
The above link is now dead... So if it was covered in the article, please forgive me...
I have been involved in a discussion with a few Americans. They claim that our dynos are out of whack... Based on: a 400Hp@crank engine making 300Hp@wheels, would be dissapatting 100Hp(75Kw or 750x 100W light bulbs!) of energy thru the gearbox. As energy cannot be created nor destroyed, where the hell is our power actually going? 75Kw of Heat and friction is rather unsettling...
I believe the 25% drivetrain loss figure to be accurate, as stated by DD in post #2. But when actually presented to me in that way, it is down right disturbing!
I can link the discussion if required...
25% for a front driver is about right and it's probably more like 30% for a RWD. Most of the extra loss in a RWD is from the diff pinion spreading load into the diff side bearings. As the final drive in a FWD is a helical travelling in the same direction, you don't get this effect. Then there's the extra inertia although you can get around that by running a real slow ramp rate.
Proper race cars with straight cut gearboxes and light weight drivetrains can get down to 10-15%. An F3 would be about 10%, a GT1 would be around 15%.
I've got a heap of paper here from Lars at Rototest in Sweden regarding drivetrain loss. The other funny thing is it gets less in higher gears, as a generalisation. Although the rolling resistance goes up with speed, the spreading force in the gearbox and diff gets less.
It's not hard to see the 25% heat loss. Especially when you've been stuck in a poorly vented dyno cell with a 650HP car, mapping it in steady state. The heat from the exhaust and dyno retarders is bad enough. I've logged gbox and diff temps on a couple of racers |'ve mapped on chassis dyno's and it's amazing how quick the temp comesup once you put a bit of load on it.
Interesting comment about the "American" calibration on the DD units. They have been known for their aggressive marketing stance in the past..........
this information is 100% right. American dynos read engine HP, and not wheel HP.
There are rolling road/chassis and hub dynos in the US.
Hub dynos read higher because there is no loss from speeding up the wheels. What confusion is there? If you can't compare dynos of the same brand but located at different locations because of atmosphere conditions, then why are we comparing different brands?
With regards to the 300 whp from a 400 crank hp car, the 100hp is lost in the drivetrain and in the dyno itself.
The more components the power goes through (the clutch, gears, differential etc..), the more energy is used to keep up the momentum. Using lightweight drivetrain components helps reduce the power loss.Quote:
Originally Posted by iamhappy46
most dynos in my experience out here read whp, not at the fly... it's in europe where output is almost always at the fly from what I've seen.Quote:
Originally Posted by Weq
Out of curiosity, what octane gas is offered out there? and what rating system is use? ron? pon? mon?
We use Ron. You can get a range of gas - regular in the low 90's, then more premium is usually 95 and up.Quote:
Originally Posted by saxman
The top stuff is around 100 :).
why do people say that the us gets much worse gas than you then?
you're not getting any higher of an octane, and the whole ethanol thing is something that isn're present everywhere in the states... only in some parts part of the year.
yeah but I believe the 100RON stuff has Ethanol in it :( So the best is actually 98RON
98 RON is the equivalent of 93 PON at US.
which is readily available in most of the us... so I'm still not getting where the whole "the US gets much worse gas then everywhere else" logic comes into playQuote:
Originally Posted by aaronng
I have no idea where that came from as well. When I went to the US, I saw that you all have the same fuel octane equivalent ratings that we have, at a lower price. Plus, your cars make more power from the same engine but slighty different fuel maps (03-05 TSX vs Accord Euro).Quote:
Originally Posted by saxman
Its probably just a case of PON and RON confusion
Saxman, go look into ur laws that bushy has passed. American gas is alot less pure then aussie stuff.
Sure the dyno's read 'WHP (yo)' but the fact is, the numbers are inflated in such a way (25-30% above the hp output) it simulates flywheel HP. The reason why they are inflated? Its just how the industry has dictated itself. DO i care they are inflated? No. Should u care they are inflated? No. The only reason this point has been brung up on an Australian forum is because so many people like to compare power outputs. The simple fact is, you cannot compare power outputs from cars around the world because the measurements are all dont in different ways.Quote:
Originally Posted by saxman
Even inside the US power outputs are not consistant. People bring up too points all the time, and whatever point gives them more HP, that is what they focus on.
1)
Thread title: "Yo dude, my car made 500whp/304wtq".
Contents: "Yeh how cool am i. the SAE corrected numbers were 420whp, but that doesnt apply too me"
Even dynojet tried to bring in a corrected system. Correction allows comparison across different climate zones. All these factors influence power output readings taken by dynos.. Americans dont seem to really care though, they will use whatever value is higher
2)
Thread title: "Yo my car made 300whp/200wtq"
Contents: "Well it actually made 220whp but it was on a mustang dyno, and the tuner who i paid alot of money for said that his dyno reads alot lower then the dynojets."
So now we have penis envy. Suddenly your car is more powerful than it really is. Its more powerful then the dyno tells u it is...
Lastly, we come down to a single point. Consistently (we, aussies) read about stock car power outputs on american sites. These stock power outputs almost match the manufactures ratings (which are acheives on engine dynos without accessories and under the most perfect condidtions known to man (fuel, oil plugs and spark all altered to give the best HP reading). Along with this, we can directly compare the readings to what out dyno's output. Our dyno's output numbers as expected when taking into consideration basic physics and mechnical principles. These basic rules of power loss through intercia, motion and yadda yadda all back up 100% that our dyno's read the 'truest' when it comes to whp.
Please dont take offense to the above. It isnt suddenly making your car any slower, i promise. If everyone beleives a lie, does it make it a lie? No! and thats all u have to care about!
LOL, that's so true!
A lot of research that Rototest did into driveline losses revealed one major point. Very few cars came even close to their advertised flywheel HP figure as stated by the manufacturer.
I know that GMH is one of Racefuels (the ELF race fuel distributor) biggest customers.