Printable View
Here are two pictures of a pre-bumlifted Accord and post-bumlifted Accord. Personally I don't like the new bum, it just looks too fussy to me and doesn't flow with the rest of the car. I much prefer the old one. Which do you like better?
http://img209.imageshack.us/img209/8...64smallns8.jpg
http://img209.imageshack.us/img209/4...02smallqi2.jpg
Don't really like either. But I think the top pic out of the two looks better.
I voted Post.
the updated bum looks heaps better in person, that's not exactly the best colour example to show it off either
^ yep i agree... i saw one in black on the road with the facelifted rear end and it looked 10x better than the old one
I like the 1998-2000 look, the whole body just looks better!
the 'accord' and the '3.0 v6 vtec' badges make it messy as on both cars
i like the bottom pic better... it just looks wack cause no plate number on it
Pre-facelift makes it look like more sophisticated. Post-facelift gives it an feeling of higher class. I'd choose post facelift just because of the twin tailpipes making the rear look complete.
I'd prefer 05 model :)
The new one is really growing on me and looks heaps better in person than the old one.
Raz
the newer one looks better in my books
hey both look nice imo
new one looks way nicer
that wasnt the question... that may be your opinion...(not mine.. 98 accords the ugliest in my book)Quote:
Originally Posted by Honda Enthusiast
facelifted model has my vote, nighthawk black pearl V6, no badges except the H.
The new bumlifted model has my vote however that centre brake light just shouldn't be on the boot, or at least it could've been smaller.