maybe it was a traction problem in the begining of the quarter mileQuote:
Originally Posted by EG5
Printable View
maybe it was a traction problem in the begining of the quarter mileQuote:
Originally Posted by EG5
stock itr's run that time from memory... should be doing better than that.
WSID?.. u talking about eastern creek?
boost: yeah its red, i heard theres a few red ones in syd
its got a problem with lossing traction in 1st and 2nd (really cheap shit tyres SAVA.. previous owner put them on)..
i htink i mentioned being able to get better times
Ive run 14.9 on a stock JDM ITR. But 107 kws at the wheels on 9psi? means that ur tuner just dumped the fuel in there so u could run 9psi man. Take it down to 6psi and put some timing back into it, take out some fuel aswell, and ud probably make the same amount of power but with less torque man.
as for a stock ITR doing only 74kws, either theres something wrong with that ITR or the dyno is very very very very conservative man. VERY. ;)
the car usually runs 4psi.. ive put in a boost controller
the car is also running water/methanol injection to cool the air intake..
anyhow i better get the car checked over again...
Really? shit! I better get out there and drag something! I've been scared to drag anything except GLI Lancers and Excels coz I thought I'd get raped by anything else :DQuote:
Originally Posted by tofu R
my stock internal 93 hatch civic SI ( 1.6 twin cam no vtec) did 15.1@90mph with bolt ons onlyQuote:
Originally Posted by incoming
and piggyback ecu.
old stock clutch too
2.1 sec 60 foot.
ITR dc2 with a good driver can hit mid 14 sec easy
15.1? geezz... is the car stripped down?.. is that on street tyre?Quote:
Originally Posted by EG5
far out!! thats heaps good
Well i have chopped turbo R33's and 180's in my stock DC5R, i thought the quarter time for the DC5 was around 15.1??