Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast
Results 1 to 12 of 41
  1. #1
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Sydney
    Car:
    CB7> EM1>MPS3

    Talking Fuel Consumtion - Accord 90-97

    Hey Guys,


    just wondering,, what you guys get for your accord's? i want to compare to mine, which i think is quite poor...i filled up this morning 36.16 L., odometer showing 320km..

    so 36.16/320 = 0.113 (times by 100) gives me 11.3L/100km using 91ULP......-.-

    Nature of driving each day: Granny Style
    5 Mins from home to Kingsgrove M5 East Entrance.
    4 Mins on M5 East (usually coasting @ 65-75km/h)
    Princess Highway exit> through newtown (stacks of traffic)> Uni of Syd

    And then reversed, from uni to home...


    Soo guys, if you could share your fuel consumptions, in a simple format like:


    Car:

    Petrol used: 91, 95 or 98, or Shell (100)

    Nature of driving: Granny (shifts@2500-3000rpm).. Rev head(shifts @ 4k+ or, holds the gear for ages)

    Actual Calculated amount of fuel consumed:
    OR
    Estimated per tank stating weather it is 55L or 60L

    And list of MODS, if any:

    Thanks Guys
    Last edited by CB7_OWNER; 09-04-2008 at 06:59 PM.
    I MISS VTEC.... BOOST is OVERATED lol

  2. #2
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Sydney west
    Car:
    CD5 / KB1
    The fuel consumption that your getting is reasonable for city driving. I saw somewhere that city driving fuel consumption for F22B non VTEC engine is 11L/100km. For highway I've manage to get 8L/100km
    Here's mine
    Car: 93 EXI
    Petrol used: unleaded 91
    Nature of driving: Granny (gear shift between 2.5k-3k)
    Actual Calculated amount of fuel consumed: 12L/100km (400km for 48L)
    Own a Honda Legend? Visit www.acuralegend.org

  3. #3
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Sydney, NSW
    Car:
    1994 Honda Accord VTI-S
    LOL, fuel consumption of a non vtec affects the question.
    If you don't have vtec, whats the point of hooning in an accord?
    Gas up the Vtec for you tonight and baby you can go wherever you like.....

  4. #4
    Car: 95 vti-s, manual

    Petrol used: mostly 98. I find using a 91 has no effect on fuel consumption. just not as smooth as 98. I use 98 for the long term benefits of having a cleaner engine.

    Nature of driving: Granny (shifts@2500-3000rpm).. Rev head(shifts @ 4k+ or, holds the gear for ages). Both. depends how i feel.

    Actual Calculated amount of fuel consumed: 10l/100km avg

    i'll go one more, tyre pressure, as i think it has a noticable impact on fuel economy. Front 37, rear 33
    Last edited by rahul; 09-04-2008 at 05:17 PM.

  5. #5
    Car is a manual 1991 CB7.

    Last long trip; Mid North Coast to Byron Bay and back. Driving = legal speed hwy driving (+ 5kmh much of the time), with much cruise control and some A/C use.

    Fuel use on that trip (carefully checked brim fill to brim fill) = 6.3L per 100km going North, 6.5L per 100km going back South. Fuel = ordinary unleaded non ethanol.

    Engine stock save for a CAI (home made). Tyre pressure front = 38psi, rear = 45psi. Toe alignment = zero front and rear. Gearbox oil = Motul synthetic (may have some slight bearing).
    Last edited by JohnL; 10-04-2008 at 07:48 AM.

  6. #6
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Sydney west
    Car:
    CD5 / KB1
    Quote Originally Posted by FAT VTI View Post
    LOL, fuel consumption of a non vtec affects the question.
    If you don't have vtec, whats the point of hooning in an accord?
    If you do some reaserch about the F22B1 engine its tuned more for flexibility and refinement than outright power. In another words more for fuel economy that power.

    This thread should be limit to non VTEC engine for a more accurate fuel comparison between one another since CB7 doesnt have VTEC engine from factory
    Own a Honda Legend? Visit www.acuralegend.org

  7. #7
    Disabled Array
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Brisbane
    Car:
    CD5 Accord VTi-S
    Quote Originally Posted by j.meng87 View Post
    If you do some reaserch about the F22B1 engine its tuned more for flexibility and refinement than outright power. In another words more for fuel economy that power.

    This thread should be limit to non VTEC engine for a more accurate fuel comparison between one another since CB7 doesnt have VTEC engine from factory
    fuel consuption specs still arent drastically different tho, the attitude of the driver prob has a higher impact (ie. ppl with vtec prob drive more agressively coz they think its better )

  8. #8
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Sydney, NSW
    Car:
    1994 Honda Accord VTI-S
    Quote Originally Posted by Vinnie View Post
    fuel consuption specs still arent drastically different tho, the attitude of the driver prob has a higher impact (ie. ppl with vtec prob drive more agressively coz they think its better )
    exactly the point I was trying to make.
    Ppl with vtec will normally drive to a degree where they can "feel" vtec.
    It sounds stupid but makes sense if u have a vtec.

    Mate, obviously the f22b1 was made for fuel economy. I dont need to research, I think its pretty obvious considering its a 100kw vtec engine which is only a sohc.
    Gas up the Vtec for you tonight and baby you can go wherever you like.....

  9. #9
    Disabled Array
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Brisbane
    Car:
    CD5 Accord VTi-S
    Quote Originally Posted by FAT VTI View Post
    exactly the point I was trying to make.
    Ppl with vtec will normally drive to a degree where they can "feel" vtec.
    It sounds stupid but makes sense if u have a vtec.

    Mate, obviously the f22b1 was made for fuel economy. I dont need to research, I think its pretty obvious considering its a 100kw vtec engine which is only a sohc.
    wasent having a go at you in particular

    the vtec engine prob be slightly better on the juice if u always drive granny style, you never need to rev it past 4krpm but wheres the fun in that

    for the point of this discussion i average around 11l/100ks with a worst of 15l/100ks (hence my point about driving style)

  10. #10
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Brisbane - Northside
    Car:
    EK4K24
    i had a really good run recently

    -CD5 Accord VTi-S - F22b1 just to be clear...
    -Automatic
    -32psi all round
    -full tank to bottom line without fuel light
    -507km

    granny driving severly lol i think there was 2, 6500 shifts
    and mostly highway suprisingly for me, i was trying for
    best consumption at reasonable and practical speeds

    i got 507Km out of a tank i could have got more but this was really run down
    fuell light hadnt came on but still... the needle in the cords go up and down
    alot anyways

  11. #11
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Western Australia
    Car:
    Euro Sport 06
    just to add a little fuel to the fire

    non vtec

    550k's off full tank (55l)
    91 ron
    25 mins at 90kph + 15 mins at 100kph (and return trip exactly the same)
    granny shifting most of the time

    not bad really 10L per 100k's

    plus I get slightly better economy when i use ultimate (98 ron) once a month

  12. #12
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Melbourne
    Car:
    95 Accord VTi
    I was just wondering if it's ok to put into neutral while scrolling down for a red light? For auto that is.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.1.3


Terms and Conditions
Ozhonda.com is in no way affiliated with the Honda motor company or Honda Australia in anyway whatsoever.