Page 9 of 23 FirstFirst ... 678910111219 ... LastLast
Results 97 to 108 of 268
  1. #97
    Newcomer Array
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    the rigg
    Car:
    Pulsar
    rx8 vs dc2r? i'd say they're both pretty even.
    rx8 mid to low 14's stock, and at the recent track event my mate got a 1:16(wakefield) with just coilovers. so i'd say pretty much same performance.

  2. #98
    Ninja turtle Array
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Sydney
    Car:
    Chloe
    Quote Originally Posted by mqt55s View Post
    rx8 vs dc2r? i'd say they're both pretty even.
    rx8 mid to low 14's stock, and at the recent track event my mate got a 1:16(wakefield) with just coilovers. so i'd say pretty much same performance.
    DC2Rs can do 1:16 without coilovers.
    --------------------------------------
    Stocky CL9 - 1:17.2

  3. #99
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Sydney
    Car:
    MX-5 SE
    rx8 is easier 2 go fast.. but not faster...
    'The Dave'

    Old - DC2R - 122fwkw - 1:10.6 WP

    New - MX5 SE - 165rwkw -

  4. #100
    Account Disabled Array
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Sydney
    Car:
    CT9A
    I was suprise it did 1.16. Awesome time. that was his frist time out too i tihnk.

  5. #101
    Ninja turtle Array
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Sydney
    Car:
    Chloe
    All in all, the RX-8 has more power, a chassis that is easier to drive hard and is RWD, giving it more traction under power so you can apply throttle earlier at the apex rather than having to wait until it is almost straight.

    But, all the above sounds like a good street sports car. The DC2R is the opposite. You have to work for your power, you have knife-edged steering response, the car sits flat when at 10/10 on the track and all the luxuries like climate control, sound deadening and cruise control are absent to save weight.The DC2R may not have outright speed, but it is a hell of a daily drivable track car. That was what the Type R philisophy was about. A hard edged track car that you could drive to and from the track, as well as be a daily driver.
    --------------------------------------
    Stocky CL9 - 1:17.2

  6. #102
    Newcomer Array
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    the rigg
    Car:
    Pulsar
    Quote Originally Posted by fatboyz39 View Post
    I was suprise it did 1.16. Awesome time. that was his frist time out too i tihnk.
    theres more in it. semi's, swaybars and correct damper settings.
    awesome car. i'd choose it over the dc2r. luxury, looks good, stock- goes fast enough for me.

  7. #103
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Syd/Melb
    Car:
    '06 VTi + misc.
    Quote Originally Posted by |N| View Post
    fair enf Joey... but u also have to keep in mind that .. honda didnt design them for straight line performance ... they r there for well balanced handling..
    so as mazda. if you want a fast straight line mazda "sports" car, dont pick the RX8.
    FD RX7 would be your best friend.

    Quote Originally Posted by vti_ek9 View Post
    doesn't the rx8 hav 50/50 wieght distribution?
    heard they were quick in corners too..
    yes, and yes

    Quote Originally Posted by vti_ek9 View Post
    n it's redline is like...9000rpm? or 8 can't remember
    redline at around 9250rpm.....

    Quote Originally Posted by joey99 View Post
    Petrol wise ... the RX8 is silly .. on a full tank of about $70-80, I was luck to get 350km out of it!
    depends on how you drive it.... if you are lead footed, expect to visit the servo more often. alot of rx8 owners have gave up checking on the km's....

    Quote Originally Posted by joey99 View Post
    I don't think I even opened the bonnet.
    right.... so you have never checked the engine oild or topping up the engine oil?

    Quote Originally Posted by Zilli View Post
    ive chopped RX8's before... low 5 second???wake up to yourselves, they are a great car but they aint THAT fast
    Quote Originally Posted by 350G View Post
    wake up..... rx8 will never did 5sec. they are not that fast as it sounds
    if you read joey99's later post, he has already corrected himself....

    Quote Originally Posted by zco View Post
    imo, the rx8 is a piece of shit.
    each to their own. im sure alot of the rx8 owners would think an EK is piece of shit...

    Quote Originally Posted by zco View Post
    ive raced two in my old stnadard ek4 and smacked them both. my car i ran my car and got 14.790.

    so the guys that say they're fast, the rx8's i raced must have had lots of problems then.
    seriously, do you think the rx8 owners would even bother to "race" an ek....

    Quote Originally Posted by Vinnie View Post
    i get the feeling that many of the people posting here have never actually driven an rx-8 but are giving second hand recounts of 'races' that have way too many varibales to be an accurate indicator of a cars performance...
    thats exactly what i was thinking...... good call vinnie.
    at the end of the day, an rx8 is pretty okay for what it is... and i still dont know why ppl would compare it with the FD RX7... they are both aimed at different markets... (rx8 = older/mature generation, rx7 = younger, wanna-go-faster generation)

    Quote Originally Posted by ROLLED View Post
    One thing I don't like about the rx-8 is the lack of headroom!!!!!!! my hair touches the roof and it's really annoying! (rx-8 fitted with electric seats + sunroof) same shit happens in the e46 330ci (elec seats + sunroof) ARGHHHHHHH
    unfortunately... you lose a couple of inch of head room with the sunroom.....

    Quote Originally Posted by flipstar View Post
    i slapped an rx8 as well nothing special also drove 1 feels like a nugget compared to a b20
    you can not use the tech you use for a b20 to drive an rx8..... anyway, each to their own.

    Quote Originally Posted by EuroAccord13 View Post
    I like the RX8...

    *Gets ready to be flamed*
    there is nothing wrong with that....

    i like hondas.

    Quote Originally Posted by .::F[L]Y::. View Post
    rx8 is nice to look at. i havnt driven one nor raced one. but i gota say they do appear slow....
    thats because they dont look all that "aerodynamic" like most of other high powered sports cars

  8. #104
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Melbourne
    Car:
    1998 EK civic
    Quote Originally Posted by xtercii View Post
    haha low 5 seconds? you think they are porsche or something, 177kw and 1350kg does not add up to low 5s mate...
    hate to bring this up million years later.. but umm that just annoyed me a bit.. 177kw an 1350kg doesnt equal low 5's... so im assuming that 206kw and 1560kg doesnt equal sub 5's to 100 either???

    On paper it doesnt look right.. but in the real world?? The gtr has 206kw, and massive weight... but clocks 100 in 4.7secs???

    and b4 everyone starts with the 4wd crap and blah blah blah... the rx8 doesnt cop much wheelspin (if any) off the line. They dont do mid 5's anyway, and having driven a dc2r... i must say that handling wise.. its fkn perfect for a fwd and the rotary is a menace in the 7k rpm+ id say the dc is quicker in the long range..

  9. #105
    on paper my car is 960kg and 141kw ~ probably gets to 100 in around 5.5 but who cares ?

    Lets keep the discussion about the 1.3's.

    IE the gti and RX8's lol

  10. #106
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Melbourne
    Car:
    ED Civic & 380GT
    Quote Originally Posted by silver_screen View Post
    On paper it doesnt look right.. but in the real world?? The gtr has 206kw, and massive weight... but clocks 100 in 4.7secs???
    You picked the wrong example. Try an example that isnt underquoting to abide with the gentlemans agreement to stick with 206kw in Japan.

    The RX8 is not underquoted.

  11. #107
    Member Array
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Villawoood
    Car:
    n/a
    Quote Originally Posted by EZZY View Post

    seriously, do you think the rx8 owners would even bother to "race" an ek....

    yes they would, they think it's gonna be an easy kill and teach the kid a lesson, then they get shitted on the face and cops a golden shower...

  12. #108
    Member Array
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Villawoood
    Car:
    n/a
    Quote Originally Posted by silver_screen View Post
    hate to bring this up million years later.. but umm that just annoyed me a bit.. 177kw an 1350kg doesnt equal low 5's... so im assuming that 206kw and 1560kg doesnt equal sub 5's to 100 either???

    On paper it doesnt look right.. but in the real world?? The gtr has 206kw, and massive weight... but clocks 100 in 4.7secs???

    and b4 everyone starts with the 4wd crap and blah blah blah... the rx8 doesnt cop much wheelspin (if any) off the line. They dont do mid 5's anyway, and having driven a dc2r... i must say that handling wise.. its fkn perfect for a fwd and the rotary is a menace in the 7k rpm+ id say the dc is quicker in the long range..
    Yes as yfin said gtr is under quoted on power, and more important you can launch these thing at 7000 or even 8000 and it just sling shots off the line, something which the rx8 can never do.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.1.3


Terms and Conditions
Ozhonda.com is in no way affiliated with the Honda motor company or Honda Australia in anyway whatsoever.