
Originally Posted by
another forum member
A WAI will be less restrictive due to less length and amount of bends in the pipe. However, you are pulling air from the warm engine bay. This is where a CAI comes in, cold air=dense air=more O2=more power. This is why dyno testing shows the results they do. However, there is one thing that needs to be taken into consideration, when the car is actually moving the air in the engine bay is not just sitting around getting hot, the intake temperature starts to drop. There is a great thread on an Altima forum where a guy actually put a digital thermometer in the intake to get readings. He tested a CAI, WAI, and a WAI with a tube feeding outside air to it(this is the type I find works the best). What he found was that the CAI stayed the most consistently cool, where as the WAI would get heat soaked at low speeds and at idle. However, when moving the WAI with the feeding tube would quickly drop to the same temperature as the CAI. Even the WAI by itself, got within 5°F of the CAI, but it took a bit longer. So what that info suggests is that even the WAI, while moving, ingests nearly the same temperature air as a CAI, and does it in a far less restrictive path. From what I have seen, the only disadvantage to running a WAI is heat soak, which believe me, sucks on a hot day in traffic. But adding a feeder tube to bring outside air to the WAI, pretty much solves the problem. The benefit to running a CAI would be the consistency, and a tad bit more midrange power(havn't figured this one out yet).
Bookmarks