Quote:
Originally Posted by
doma
You are the biggest noob as all you do is avoid the fact and give excuses such as semi slick tyres.
so you cant argue without calling names.
alright if i'm a noob u're a fxxking idiot. you are happy now huh :wave:
u are the one avoiding facts. so you want to compare a prototype on semi slicks with a factory street car on street tyres?
Quote:
Of course they are both not stock. They are both tuned by Mugen.
u idiot they are complete cars produced by Mugen. Mugen made 300 FD RR and 20 FN to a spec.
Quote:
I was making a point that torsion beam Mugen is faster than IRS Mugen.
big deal, you need an advantage to win. how about installing NOS and claim victory.
Quote:
Stock vs Stock... FD2R vs FN2R both with LSD... the FD2R is only 8/10ths faster.
A very poor effort.
yup very poor effort consider that the RRP for FN in Japan is more than a FD. you pay more for less performance lol
Quote:
So in actual fact, FN2R is not as bad as you think. It just needs LSD and shed some weight, and it'll beat FD2R, regardless of the rear suspension.
i never said FN is bad. u are the insecured one trying to defend with bullshit.
Quote:
All you stupid noobs ever say when you see FN2 beat FD2 is that the FN2 is not stock, blah blah blah
You're so quick to dismiss and judge that you ignore pertinent points you are so delusional.
I'm not saying FN2 is faster than FD2, I'm saying, dont be too quick to judge the FN2. It's better than you think it is.
you idiot, with your attitude, people are continuing to look down on the FN.
Quote:
For a car that weighs 100kg more with less hp, the FN2 is only 8/10ths slower than FD2.
Stop ignoring this statistic.
your statistic is flawed yet again and the following is prove.
FN2R weights 1345kg.
FD2R weights 1260kg. not exactly 100kg. if you want to call people names, at least get all your facts correct.
and be proud of what FN achieved. if u're happy with your choice, thats the only thing matters.