Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 25 to 36 of 53
  1. #25
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    "The Place To Be"
    Car:
    Euro Lux
    Quote Originally Posted by nd55 View Post
    > ado7 vs reoo1

    AD-07 are comparable to Bridgestone RE-01R which is one step higher on the BS range. That and almost a $100-200 more, per tyre.

    UTQG (very rough tyre wear guide): T1-R 280, RE001 200, RE-01R 140.

    nick.

    Treadwear for the RE001's is 220. Well in my old mans 215/40/17 profile they are...

    I still dont understand how the T1R's could be better in the dry just based on the treadwear alone...much softer compound....
    >> Now Known as "Phased"

  2. #26

  3. #27
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Sydney
    Car:
    integra ls
    i have had both t1r's and re001s. i prefer the re001's.

  4. #28
    Quote Originally Posted by Sp00ny View Post
    Based on which tests or opinions?

    sorry , i forgot to say IMO.

    Had both and driven hard n soft on both and RE001 is better in every way IMO

  5. #29
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    perth
    Car:
    fd1
    ^ also with the adrenaline series you can pretend to be seriously awesome and get some white out and colour in "bridgestone/potenza/adrenaline/re001" white. im tempted to do it in pink on my tires for a laugh
    2012 BMW S1000rr - 184whp, 9.733s @ 148.27mph - Quick enough!
    2006 Honda Civic - 101whp, 61s BBGL Short - When I need a bbt.

  6. #30
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Sydney - Cabramatta/Liver
    Car:
    Jazz EVO IX
    ahh well i might go get some more
    Evo IX - THE FINAL EVOLUTION

  7. #31
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    perth
    Car:
    eg sedan
    people paint it themselves? lol

  8. #32
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Melb
    Car:
    Corolla AE92
    RE001's at the moment (2nd set)

    Very good tyre for the price they are going for and it's good in the wet. Can't say about T1Rs but would like to try

  9. #33
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    "The Place To Be"
    Car:
    Euro Lux
    Quote Originally Posted by bennjamin View Post
    sorry , i forgot to say IMO.

    Had both and driven hard n soft on both and RE001 is better in every way IMO
    Wasn't having a go at you... I'm actually interested in your opinion and which aspects you believe they outperform... when purchasing tyres worth near or over $800 Just want to make sure im getting the best possible tyre .

    I rate Sidewall Stiffness/Steering Response and dry grip highly.

    Wet grip doesn't worry me...Just go slower...I'm used to driving on silverstones which probebly have a real tread wear rating of 800...lol very hard compound; completely and utterly useless in the wet.
    >> Now Known as "Phased"

  10. #34
    "UTQG (very rough tyre wear guide)"

    'rough' being the key word.

    > I still dont understand how the T1R's could be better in the dry just based on the treadwear alone...much softer compound

    err, I didn't say they were better.



    UTQG = 100 is the standard.

    UTQG = 300 means the tyre will last three times longer on a standard test run in the US.

    UTQG = 200 means the tyre will last two times longer on a standard test run in the US.

    UTQG = 140 means the tyre will last 40% longer ......

    UTQG = 50 means the tyre will only last half the distance of the standard tyre.

    Assuming there's a reasonable inverse correlation between tyre wear and grip, we can use the UTQG number as a guide to grip/wear.

    Higher being longer lasting.
    Lower being sportier tyres.

    I'm not going to propose this is the be all of tyre ratings, however, I've yet to see anything better.

    Nick.

  11. #35
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Sydney - Cabramatta/Liver
    Car:
    Jazz EVO IX
    good info there + rep
    Evo IX - THE FINAL EVOLUTION

  12. #36
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    syd
    Car:
    ek
    Quote Originally Posted by nd55 View Post
    "UTQG (very rough tyre wear guide)"

    'rough' being the key word.

    > I still dont understand how the T1R's could be better in the dry just based on the treadwear alone...much softer compound

    err, I didn't say they were better.



    UTQG = 100 is the standard.

    UTQG = 300 means the tyre will last three times longer on a standard test run in the US.

    UTQG = 200 means the tyre will last two times longer on a standard test run in the US.

    UTQG = 140 means the tyre will last 40% longer ......

    UTQG = 50 means the tyre will only last half the distance of the standard tyre.

    Assuming there's a reasonable inverse correlation between tyre wear and grip, we can use the UTQG number as a guide to grip/wear.

    Higher being longer lasting.
    Lower being sportier tyres.

    I'm not going to propose this is the be all of tyre ratings, however, I've yet to see anything better.

    Nick.
    well the tread wear rating on the RE01R and AD07 have same specs, but the RE01R shits all over the AD07 LOL

    as for the RE001. its got very low tread wear rating. taken from tirerack.com, it something along hte lines of 340AA

    anyone know what the tread rating is for a T1R tyre ?

    i'd prefer the re001, over the t1r.. less road noise would be the 2nd noticeable difference over the obvious traction point.
    Last edited by zco; 24-10-2008 at 09:57 AM.
    12.949 @ 107.71mph
    2.063 60ft on Advan AD08
    EKK20A 142.9kw on 98ron

    its not called stance if you're on spacers..

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.1.3


Terms and Conditions
Ozhonda.com is in no way affiliated with the Honda motor company or Honda Australia in anyway whatsoever.