Increased PM quotas

**joyride** · 31-05-2009 03:01 PM

1. 90 second wait between PM.
2. OH supporters to receive a higher quota than members.

i'll bring this up with the moderator team for you guys. please do not expect too much out of it however. i would assume that reducing the PM waiting time would be at the cost of something else for example, search times.

mikeyg, when i was an OH supporter, i only had 150 PMs. how did you get 300?

**trism** · 31-05-2009 03:42 PM

thats the amount these days iirc

**wynode** · 01-06-2009 10:47 PM

Originally Posted by hisoka

is that thing still going to be there, were the pms you cant send you have to wait for 80 seconds ?

cool upgrades btw

Was 90 seconds but as requested I've just dropped it down to 60.

Originally Posted by MikeyG

wyn sinec you have upgraded normal accounts can you upgrade the supporters.. i delete my old ones and still have 300 pms -.-

Come on guys.......300 is heaps......if you have that many then delete some LOL

Originally Posted by joyride

1. 90 second wait between PM.
2. OH supporters to receive a higher quota than members.

i'll bring this up with the moderator team for you guys. please do not expect too much out of it however. i would assume that reducing the PM waiting time would be at the cost of something else for example, search times.

mikeyg, when i was an OH supporter, i only had 150 PMs. how did you get 300?

$20 subscription gets 150 but $30 gets 300.

As for #2 Andy......supporters already have more than three times the normal members PM quota!

**G-Stick** · 01-06-2009 11:11 PM

wyn, can the supporters get a even shorter wait for pm'ing? sometimes i forget to reply to peoples pms because it takes so long to reply to multiple pms and i get distracted.

if u cant its ok... i guess..

**hisoka** · 01-06-2009 11:28 PM

thanks for dropping the pm thing boss~ i think the pm storage is good enough, just delete old ones

**wynode** · 02-06-2009 08:07 AM

Originally Posted by G-Stick

wyn, can the supporters get a even shorter wait for pm'ing? sometimes i forget to reply to peoples pms because it takes so long to reply to multiple pms and i get distracted.

if u cant its ok... i guess..

I have it set as a global option so currently it cannot be changed for the various usergroups sorry!

**jks24** · 02-06-2009 03:56 PM

this is good, always thought 30 was to small.

**dc2itr** · 02-06-2009 06:30 PM

WOoohooO. Good stuff guys. Always thought 30 was a bit low aswell but I thought the point was to get people to pay subscription. Could this make the $20 subscription less appealing to some people seeing as it is now 60 -> 150, instead of the old 30 -> 150??? I guess the annoyance factor is still there with the new 60 quota but maybe it would be worth upping the $20 and $30 quotas?

I too find the wait between PMs (even @ 60s) and searches quite annoying but I do realise that there is often a trade off that needs to be made. But then again, I'm sure some people would pay a fee to override these features.

Just my 2 cents.