Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 12 of 25
  1. #1
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    MELB
    Car:
    JDM B18CR

    Edelbrock Victor X Vs Skunk2 Intake Manifolds

    Hi guys,

    What are you're experiences/reviews with these 2 IM's and what do you reccommend on a DC2?

  2. #2
    sk2 is dc2r copy.

    edelbrock is performance.

  3. #3
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Melbourne
    Car:
    ( . )_( . )
    mild NA to stock motor turbo stock rev range - go skunk
    reving to 9-10k, higher boost ie 15psi + built motor or a hypo NA go the victor x

    skunk will be more responsive and more mid, power till 8.5-9k, the victor x will have less mid but will allow you to breathe 9k+ rpm

    simple as that!

  4. #4
    skunk2 is better to compare to PerformerX isn't it?
    B20VTEC - since 2002

  5. #5
    i got the edelbrock on my car its sick

  6. #6
    Quote Originally Posted by nhaniez View Post
    i got the edelbrock on my car its sick
    um, did you mean 'fully sick' or just normal 'sick'?
    B20VTEC - since 2002

  7. #7
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    ACT
    Car:
    Integra DC2
    does anyone know how the the Skunk2 manifolds go on the Vtir's?
    ...LS...

  8. #8
    As I said before, Skunk2 manifolds are pretty much a copy of the Type R manifold.

    Using a Skunk manifold on a VtiR will bring the stock throttle body from the lower vtir position up to the higher type R position.

  9. #9
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    MELB
    Car:
    JDM B18CR
    so edelbrock is better for high NA revs & boosted apps while skunk2 is for the normal bolt ons for complete NA... right?

    Then has any1 used both on these on the same engine? Pros n Cons?

  10. #10
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Sydney
    Car:
    doorstop
    Quote Originally Posted by zropts View Post
    so edelbrock is better for high NA revs & boosted apps while skunk2 is for the normal bolt ons for complete NA... right?

    Then has any1 used both on these on the same engine? Pros n Cons?
    if your talking about th3e victorX with its short stubby little runners than yes it would suit better to that application,but as tinks said skunk is better compared to the longer runnered performerX

  11. #11
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Melbourne
    Car:
    EG4
    Quote Originally Posted by Bludger View Post
    Using a Skunk manifold on a VtiR will bring the stock throttle body from the lower vtir position up to the higher type R position.
    True that.
    If you have a VTIR CAI, you will also need a Type R CAI.
    Also a good idea to match the TB and IM inlet diameters.

  12. #12
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Melbourne
    Car:
    EG4
    Quote Originally Posted by doonbar View Post
    does anyone know how the the Skunk2 manifolds go on the Vtir's?
    VTIRs work well with the Skunk2 IM because like the type R manifold,
    it does not use the dual stage butterflies. It will eliminate the 4xxx rpm
    induction noise then the 5xxx rpm vtec crossover, instead it will have that
    one distinct vtec crossover.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.1.3


Terms and Conditions
Ozhonda.com is in no way affiliated with the Honda motor company or Honda Australia in anyway whatsoever.