Type R external mirrors- false impression distances

[aaronng]

"Unfortunately, in the FD2, you're relying on your mirrors a lot more as the blind spots and rear vision is terrible in the Type R.."

U aint f---ing kidding buddy. What the hell is the use of these modern mirrors giving u "a wider field of vision" if u then have to look in the rear view mirror to double check.Pardon my baby boomer ignorance but i thought external mirrors were there to pick up cars out of the field of vision of the rear view mirror and act as a total extension to it. I am obviously talking to gen y and z so just forget it guys.

Mirrors are just for initial checking if it is clear to lane change. Then you do a headcheck to confirm that before changing lanes because the mirrors themselves have a blindspot from your rear quarter panel to the front quarter panel. A lot of people forget this and you end up with some people changing into your lane and bashing your car.

[JaCe]

Beats me how people can't figure this one out.

[Ninjadust77]

the mirrors are only just a guide... u should still be looking over ur shoulder anyways...
drive properly and dont be lazy

[Nickykeeng]

mirrors are to check if there's any cars around not to guage how far they are from you. If they're too close to the point that its not "clear to go" then you should wait and not blame the mirrors

[Stig]

one of the features i love about the new civic besides from the cool windscreen wiper is the side mirrors, they offer a wider range of view compared to other side mirrors so you know what is around you

[sitta]

i find it the other way around.. objects in the mirror are closer than they actually are...

[paulh]

I don't like the convex mirrors either. I've had them on my new Honda for ~9 months, and had a few near misses in similar circumstances. Someone in front brakes heavily, I quickly look in R rear view mirror, lane has a car but it looks like space to enter lane, but really there isn't as much as it appears as the car in that lane is alot closer than it looks.
So what I should do is just brake heavily and hope I don't go up the bum of the car infront because I don't have time to first check the interior mirror, then external mirror, then turn my head around, or even just turn my head around which takes longer than a quick glance into a flat mirror.
I've had flat mirrors for 30 years of driving and never had an accident with them, so I personally think if you're an experience driver and know how to set up the flat mirrors correctly you'll not have any blind spots.
In my opinion, flat mirrors should be an option, atleast on the drivers side.
Does anyone know when regulations changed, as ADR 14/01, 2006, states right side exterior mirror should be flat...that was only 4 yrs ago, so I'm assuming it changed after then?

[Vestri]

"Unfortunately, in the FD2, you're relying on your mirrors a lot more as the blind spots and rear vision is terrible in the Type R.."

U aint f---ing kidding buddy. What the hell is the use of these modern mirrors giving u "a wider field of vision" if u then have to look in the rear view mirror to double check.Pardon my baby boomer ignorance but i thought external mirrors were there to pick up cars out of the field of vision of the rear view mirror and act as a total extension to it. I am obviously talking to gen y and z so just forget it guys.

Id like to point out Im not Y or Z, and your assumption and obvious discrimination of the youth is disturbing and ignorant... That shows an obvious ego about your belief that the youth are always wrong if they dont agree with baby boomers.

Driver safety INCLUDES looking over your shoulder. Dont blame mirrors for your own inability to drive safely.

What shocks me more is that people STILL think that in todays modern hi-tech world, that cars no longer have blind spots. They still do, no matter how well the car is designed. Unless you want Windows/glass for rear and B pillars.

If they still teach the youth about blindspots, dont trust mirrors for distance, and also HEAD CHECKS, the elderly dont have an exception. Being born a baby boomer doesnt mean you can jsut dismiss X and Y just because you think they are wipper snappers. My kids know more than me about driving, even though I have been driving longer than them, and Im more than happy to take my car to the track, use my kid's forum username to read this forum, and Im also more than happy to send them to free driver safety courses where they learn about dangerous driving... something us old blokes never got and have to pay to get nowadays. But the youth, to get cheaper insurance, can take a free course on how hard they can push a car.

So if you are blaming the mirrors for your own inability, then X and Y have every right to tell you, that you need a driving lesson.

[Vestri]

In my opinion, flat mirrors should be an option, atleast on the drivers side. Does anyone know when regulations changed, as ADR 14/01, 2006, states right side exterior mirror should be flat...that was only 4 yrs ago, so I'm assuming it changed after then?

They are not a legal option based on the design on of a car. if they are flat, then the car's design legally allows for it. If its convex, then there is a legal, and also a safety reason to have them.

If you cant do a 1,2,3:
1) check rear
2) check the side you are doing to merge into
3) Head check

Then get a drivers lesson. A simple 1,2,3 should only take 1 - 2 seconds. Thats more than enough at any speed, if youa re cutting it close, you are either too fast, or driving too close... Its your own responsibility to leave enough space between you and the car in front. Its also another driving safety skill eveyone is taught.

[paulh]

They are not a legal option based on the design on of a car. if they are flat, then the car's design legally allows for it. If its convex, then there is a legal, and also a safety reason to have them.

If you cant do a 1,2,3:
1) check rear
2) check the side you are doing to merge into
3) Head check

Then get a drivers lesson. A simple 1,2,3 should only take 1 - 2 seconds. Thats more than enough at any speed, if youa re cutting it close, you are either too fast, or driving too close... Its your own responsibility to leave enough space between you and the car in front. Its also another driving safety skill eveyone is taught.

A head turn to the RIGHT accomplishes very little in my car, and it is the right mirror I'm talking about. The pillar is in the way. I suppose I could wind down the window, stick my head out for a proper look, but that'd take longer again.
The head turn is more relevant to checking the left side of the car, and I don't have a problem with the left side convex mirror.
As far as travelling too close, it's generally other people who tailgate me who are likely to cause the accident if I don't change lanes and brake hard, in the context of the situation I found myself in. Staying in the same lane would have been the only alternative if the right hand lane was not free in any case.
You can preach all you want about convex being safer, but in some instances, it's not always the case.

[aero]

^

during my driving lessons way back, i was told that head checks are much more relevant to the driver's side, than the passenger's side.. even tho u should always check either depending on which lane u are moving into.

are u a big or tall bloke, paulh? if not, it could help if u move ur seat forward a bit. it may allow u to see what is beside u, rather than be obstructed by the pillar. or u could get some spot mirrors. if u cant move ur seat forward or cannot afford to wind the window down, and check ur blind spot. it doesnt beat actually turning ur head to look.. but when u have no other choice...