Page 8 of 27 FirstFirst ... 56789101118 ... LastLast
Results 85 to 96 of 314

Thread: Which R?

  1. #85
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    www.alibaba.com
    Car:
    porsche boxster
    Quote Originally Posted by 4age8u View Post
    Honda are absolute shit off vtec torque less pieces of crap
    Thats not an issue of Hondas design,its physics in general.

    Theres only so much torque an NA 1600/1800/2000cc can produce while staying a well mannered everyday engine.

  2. #86
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Sydney
    Car:
    EM1 -> DC2R
    and.. my dc2r only uses about 7L/100KMs WIN, doesn't burn oil WIN, nothing breaks down WIN. Cost effective car as well.

  3. #87
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Sydney
    Car:
    Integra
    Quote Originally Posted by RtN View Post
    and.. my dc2r only uses about 7L/100KMs WIN, doesn't burn oil WIN, nothing breaks down WIN. Cost effective car as well.
    Exactly. The DC2R does serve a purpose. It's a compromise between everyday usability and practicality, and performance.

    That's why I prefer the S2k. It's uncompromising in every way.

  4. #88
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Sydney
    Car:
    Honda S15
    Quote Originally Posted by 4age8u View Post
    Honda are absolute shit off vtec torque less pieces of crap
    Not all are without torque. The majority is though when stock.
    JDM S15 Spec R is gutless too when stock

  5. #89
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Sydney
    Car:
    legtec @2psi
    Quote Originally Posted by 4age8u View Post
    Honda are absolute shit off vtec torque less pieces of crap
    Really?.... you seem like those kids that had nugget cars all his life, and as soon as you
    jump in a turbo car you think its the fastest thing in the world... Seen it too too often
    Ive got a MY04 WRX and off boost its painfully anooying to
    drive. My CRX K20 would leave it for dead ... Responsive N/A > Laggy turbo
    If i was to build a track car it would be a K series Honda 100%, way more challenging and fun to drive.


  6. #90
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Japan
    Car:
    EP3 CTR
    I raced this guy from my work who kept saying his silvia q's s13 would blow away my dc4 gsi. So we went down to our friends farm that has its own "private road" and beat him repeatedly. Nevertheless he shut up and never mentioned Hondas were a torque less pos and nowadays with the k20a torque I couldnt care what no turbo knob says.
    AKA: The Spaniard! +1 Rep me if you find my posts useful.

  7. #91
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Sydney
    Car:
    legtec @2psi
    Quote Originally Posted by DakDak View Post
    Not all are without torque. The majority is though when stock.
    JDM S15 Spec R is gutless too when stock
    I can confirm this, dailying one at the moment...

    What is even gutless is the NA S15, now that thing is a nugget


  8. #92
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Sydney
    Car:
    Integra
    Quote Originally Posted by GSi_PSi View Post
    Really?.... you seem like those kids that had nugget cars all his life, and as soon as you
    jump in a turbo car you think its the fastest thing in the world... Seen it too too often
    Ive got a MY04 WRX and off boost its painfully anooying to
    drive. My CRX K20 would leave it for dead ... Responsive N/A > Laggy turbo
    If i was to build a track car it would be a K series Honda 100%, way more challenging and fun to drive.
    On the one hand, you're saying that the K series is more challenging to drive, but surely keeping a 'laggy turbo' on boost is part of the challenge of driving a turbo car rather than a 'responsive N/A'.

  9. #93
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Sydney
    Car:
    legtec @2psi
    Quote Originally Posted by Indie View Post
    On the one hand, you're saying that the K series is more challenging to drive, but surely keeping a 'laggy turbo' on boost is part of the challenge of driving a turbo car rather than a 'responsive N/A'.
    With that statement i was refering to K series honda ie FWD..... as all the K series swapped or stock cars seem to be. Look at the the BYP DC2R, EG everyone said
    no FWD could come close the 1 minute barrier at Wakefield park, look at them now..... they challenged everyone and proved them wrong.
    I dunno how much bang for buck you can get honestly, talking to Lotus elise owners who have spent close to 300K and getting 1:03 times same as the NA EG K24
    its just mindblowing.


  10. #94
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    www.alibaba.com
    Car:
    porsche boxster
    Quote Originally Posted by GSi_PSi View Post
    Really?.... you seem like those kids that had nugget cars all his life, and as soon as you
    jump in a turbo car you think its the fastest thing in the world... Seen it too too often
    Ive got a MY04 WRX and off boost its painfully anooying to
    drive. My CRX K20 would leave it for dead ... Responsive N/A > Laggy turbo
    If i was to build a track car it would be a K series Honda 100%, way more challenging and fun to drive.
    Youre right. He recently got a gc8 rex and suddenly thinks its a ferrari and all others are below lol

  11. #95
    Account Disabled Array
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    dc2r has more than enough for daily duties in stock form.

    sure, if you want a monster, how on earth can you use it sensibly on the street?

  12. #96
    Member Array
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Sydney
    Car:
    na2 typeR
    DC5r cos it looks the best out of the three.

    Personally, with that money i'd build an EG-K series

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.1.3


Terms and Conditions
Ozhonda.com is in no way affiliated with the Honda motor company or Honda Australia in anyway whatsoever.