Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 13 to 24 of 31
  1. #13
    wow that is a sweet kit.

    I just wish we got the Direct Inject Engine and CVT of the US model in Australia.

  2. #14
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Melb
    Car:
    '03 Euro [CL9]
    Quote Originally Posted by stevo1210 View Post
    The new Accord we have here has the all new "Earth Dreams" motor as well. The previous Accord had the K24 thing at 133KW vs. new Earth dreams motor at 129KW, though you got a bit extra torque. Lose a bit, gain a bit.

    we dont have the same "Earth Dream"motor....

    ours is a cut cost version, still have port injection, the USDM have DIRECT injection, and makes crap load more torque than ours.
    2003 CL9 5AT *ECU REFLASHED*
    CT-E Icebox|Ralco RZ pulleys|K&N filter|DC Header|250cell Cat|Cusco Tower & H Brace| H.Drive Coilovers | Rays RE30 18x8.5 | S/S Brakelines | Rigid Collars

  3. #15
    Newcomer Array
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Car:
    2013 Accord~US
    Quote Originally Posted by Fredoops View Post
    we dont have the same "Earth Dream"motor....

    ours is a cut cost version, still have port injection, the USDM have DIRECT injection, and makes crap load more torque than ours.
    Interesting, Fredoops. Here's a pic under the bonnet. Certainly looks like the pic from the Wards Top 10 article. But then looks can be deceiving. Is the difference at the back side (Injection), rather than the exhaust side, visible in pic.?
    On a recent trip to the Gold Coast we were getting mid 6~7 l/100Kms though.



    Last edited by frailer5; 17-05-2014 at 11:08 PM.

  4. #16
    dead give away is the little part that says CVT. we def dont have that. also it's assembled in ....OH. Honda
    United States
    http://goo.gl/maps/ublTW
    Using Tapatalk

  5. #17
    Newcomer Array
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Car:
    2013 Accord~US
    Interesting. I'll follow up on this. Was aware of the separate US manufacture, but had (wrongly, it seems) assumed that this would be the same engine but made in (most likely) Thailand.'Not so, it seems.

  6. #18
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Melb
    Car:
    '03 Euro [CL9]
    Quote Originally Posted by frailer5 View Post
    Interesting. I'll follow up on this.
    dont have to follow up

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Honda_K_engine

    our engines have 10HP and 20NM LESS than the US model because we dont have direct injection,

    and we dont have CVT.

    We have the cost-cut version, K24W4, USA have K24W2 with the goodies.


    we didnt get the WARD's top 10 engine, we got it's crippled brother.
    2003 CL9 5AT *ECU REFLASHED*
    CT-E Icebox|Ralco RZ pulleys|K&N filter|DC Header|250cell Cat|Cusco Tower & H Brace| H.Drive Coilovers | Rays RE30 18x8.5 | S/S Brakelines | Rigid Collars

  7. #19
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Perth
    Car:
    CD5 & GE6
    CVT /shudder
    You've gone through more accords than I changed underwear this month! - Sugz

    www.OzAccord.net/forum

  8. #20
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Sydney
    Car:
    EP3R>AH>EK>DC2
    Quote Originally Posted by Fredoops View Post
    we didnt get the WARD's top 10 engine, we got it's crippled brother.
    LOOOOLOLOL

    SPAMMAPS
    Carburettor|Nation

    that mikey G guy is the biggest shit talker ive ever met..
    in the space of 15minutes he sold two sets of wheels. claims a guy under the username DNT-CRY bought them!

  9. #21
    Newcomer Array
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Car:
    2013 Accord~US
    Thanks for the info/leads...
    Drives very nicely. Can't imagine how a DI would be; noticeably better, I assume. But yeah, opinion is divided over CVT.
    Actually, the ideal would be VW Group's 7-speed DSG, which I experienced on a Skoda Octavia rental car. Well, one that didn't break, which would probably be the case if Honda built it.
    Last edited by frailer5; 18-05-2014 at 03:15 PM.

  10. #22
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Melb
    Car:
    '03 Euro [CL9]
    Quote Originally Posted by frailer5 View Post
    Thanks for the info/leads...
    Drives very nicely. Can't imagine how a DI would be; noticeably better, I assume. But yeah, opinion is divided over CVT.
    Actually, the ideal would be VW Group's 7-speed DSG, which I experienced on a Skoda Octavia rental car. Well, one that didn't break, which would probably be the case if Honda built it.

    Honda is building a DSG, one with a torque converter added
    2003 CL9 5AT *ECU REFLASHED*
    CT-E Icebox|Ralco RZ pulleys|K&N filter|DC Header|250cell Cat|Cusco Tower & H Brace| H.Drive Coilovers | Rays RE30 18x8.5 | S/S Brakelines | Rigid Collars

  11. #23
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Perth
    Car:
    CD5 & GE6
    Didn't VW have alot of well known publiized DSG problems?

    And it's a bit poor on hondas part to still not bring in DI (fully released worldwide)
    When it was used in the NSX over 20 years ago as well as coil packs
    You've gone through more accords than I changed underwear this month! - Sugz

    www.OzAccord.net/forum

  12. #24
    Newcomer Array
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Car:
    2013 Accord~US
    Quote Originally Posted by Jasemas View Post
    Didn't VW have a lot of well known publiized DSG problems?

    And it's a bit poor on hondas part to still not bring in DI (fully released worldwide)
    When it was used in the NSX over 20 years ago as well as coil packs
    ... yep, hence my proviso comment.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.1.3


Terms and Conditions
Ozhonda.com is in no way affiliated with the Honda motor company or Honda Australia in anyway whatsoever.