-
Well, 8L is enough for around two laps at most circuits.
Average F1 fuel consumption is around 75L/100km
Imola is 4.93 km hence 3.7L per lap
Part of me is saying they cheated get rid of them and the other half is saying maybe a fine and 1 race suspension would be enough.
I'm guessing they (FIA) want to make an example of if you cheat you will end up like BAR-Honda.
OH well, whats done is done but the reputation will last a lot longer.
-
hmmm bugger, well if they were found for cheating I spose it's all fair This'll learn em'
WDM. World Domestic Market.
Subaru y0!
-
BAR Honda's reaction to ICA's decision
'This penalty is wholly and grossly disproportionate'
Nick Fry
Following the decision of the FIA International Court of Appeal (ICA) earlier today, Nick Fry, Chief Executive Officer of B·A·R Honda made the following statement in relation to the ruling:
"B·A·R Honda is appalled at the decision of the FIA International Court of Appeal and asserts that the judgement is contrary to all of the evidence heard yesterday. The team proved that it complied with the current regulations and the FIA now acknowledges that the regulations are unclear.
"We repeat that at no time did B·A·R Honda run underweight at the San Marino Grand Prix and this was also unchallenged by the FIA.
"While the International Court of Appeal rejected the FIA's original accusations of fraud and deception, B·A·R Honda says that this penalty is wholly and grossly disproportionate.
"The team is advised by its legal counsel that the judgement is plainly wrong based on the evidence presented and it is currently examining its options."
Press release
BAR Honda
-
thats sad, cheatings cheating. So what do you think honda take over at the end of the year?
-
Man I hope they are on the grid, cos they were set to kick ass this week at Barcelona.
-
I just dont know. I mean, its Honda, they are always on the edge of everything, I really dont think they 'overlooked' something and were wrong. Nor do I think they would cheat. Its been said that the rules were unclear, they merely(sp) took use of this. If they are smart enough to use that, then thumbs up to them.
-
bar is ghey, go the red cars
-
"cancel the decision taken by the Stewards because it did not respect the technical and sporting regulations of Formula One as well as the rules of the International Sporting Code"
I wonder what the stewards at the GP do then. Might as well let FIA take the F1 cars home to check it out.
the information contridicts
Article 1.9 “the weight of the car with the driver wearing his complete racing apparel, at all times during the event”, and must not be related with the weight of the car in ‘running order’ as defined in article 1.10
Article 4.1. of the Technical Regulations, without mentioning the fuel, requires that at all times during the event, whether or not the driver is weighed separately, the weight must not be less than 600 kg.
"The FIA now acknowledges that the regulations are unclear. We repeat that at no time did BAR Honda run underweight at the San Marino Grand Prix and this was also unchallenged by the FIA."
I think BAR just happen to find a hole in the rules as the stupid F1 Article is so shit.
stupid BAR and FIA (ICA is run by FIA people)
can Honda buy out BAR tmr and rename it to Honda F1 Racing?
bring on GPWC!!!
-
Well, this is bumfuzzling. The FIA wants to ban a team from F1. Why? Because they were trying to exploit a loophole. Every team tries to exploit loopholes, that's what gives you the edge.
Remember when Bridgestone were found to have illegal spec tyres? They rolled onto the sidewall for more grip. Did the FIA call for Bridgestone to be banned from F1?
No seriously... did they? I can't remember.
Not sure what the FIA is planning. Shouldn't you be encouraging teams in F1? Especially high profile ones like BAR Honda. Give them a fine, take a few points, close the loophole or ambiguity and continue.
I don't see what the fuss is about. The teams are always trying to exploit the rules. If you ban every team which exploits the rules, you have no F1. The punishments have to be significant and proportional. Fines and point deductions should be sufficient.
I'm pretty certain that no team complies with the rules 100%. There are always interpretations of ambiguity and loopholes to exploit. It's unfortunately the way it is.
-
Originally Posted by Vivski
I'm pretty certain that no team complies with the rules 100%. There are always interpretations of ambiguity and loopholes to exploit. It's unfortunately the way it is.
just coz everyone else is doing it it makes it ok? Rules are rules, you break them you wear the consequences. If it's an ambiguity then its up to you to prove you were right, happens in law all the time, its all open to interpretation.
Anyways, its only two races. i think thats a fair punishment. Anything less wouldn't even be a punishment. Just stripping imola points would be what? 8 points or something, as opposed to 8 points plus the chance of 16 more.
Having said all that, I'm all for GPWC!
Last edited by Hondavirgin; 06-05-2005 at 12:44 PM.
Reason: read some other posts.
ALL WITCHES' HATS MUST DIE!!!!!
-
From what I've heard, I think 2 race suspension and 6 month suspended plus being stripped of points is fair. Maybe take away all their points for the season so far (which isn't much).
It may've been unclear in my post, but I think 2 races is a good punishment. Shame to penalise Button and Sato who may or may not've known about it. What I don't think is a fair and proportional punishment is the FIA calling for a total ban. That's just stupidity.
-
good point about not punishing jenson and sato too much cause chances are they might not of known, and an un-intentional mistake from the team, I think the current punishment is fair however, only way to learn
WDM. World Domestic Market.
Subaru y0!
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
Bookmarks