Page 3 of 12 FirstFirst 123456 ... LastLast
Results 25 to 36 of 133

Thread: MIVEC vs VTEC

  1. #25
    and did u kno honda copied the double vanos system
    bmw had this system way before honda had anything
    honda jus poured millions of dollars into it to patent it and make it cost effective
    so what u guys really are driving is rip off versions of bmw

  2. #26
    the reason why honda stayed NA was the owner's son died in an accident and therefore the owner decided to make safer cars = no turbo
    and the K20A was

  3. #27
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    MELB CBD
    Car:
    EF9 SiR & CRV
    Quote Originally Posted by V8_Hero
    the EJ20s i feel are overrated, as different and good as they seem, their associated gear box and clutch problems jus beg to differ (cept with newer models)
    and imho horizontally opposed engines mechanics find are a bitch to work on
    i mean have u looked at a rex engine, omg spaghetti everywhere, wtf is that, its a 4 leg octopus
    hahaha.. yeah i know what you mean.. but we're talking about reliably built engines.
    i wasn't talking about gearbox and clutches etc.. that's just opening a whole new can of worms.. lol
    along the time lines... EJ20 has withstanded a better rating worldwide over the 4G63..
    but i agree about it being a b*tch to work on.. as i've owned a 4G63 and a EJ20 equipped car.
    i think we should move this other portion of the topic to a different topic.
    what do you think mods?
    [EXE Crew]
    JDM EF9 SiR

  4. #28
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    MELB CBD
    Car:
    EF9 SiR & CRV
    Quote Originally Posted by V8_Hero
    and did u kno honda copied the double vanos system
    bmw had this system way before honda had anything
    honda jus poured millions of dollars into it to patent it and make it cost effective
    so what u guys really are driving is rip off versions of bmw
    in the end..
    each idea has been taken and influenced in their own way..
    guess it's up to who develops a better concept.
    in this topic i still believe that Honda have provided better goods...
    when comparing the N/A VTEC and N/A MIVEC engines...
    [EXE Crew]
    JDM EF9 SiR

  5. #29
    yeha but the thing with EJ20s, they are marketed way more than the 4g63s, that is why more people recognise it with the wrx than the evo.

  6. #30
    Quote Originally Posted by Surrufus
    wondering which car would perform better:
    Mitsubishi Mirage with 1.8L DOHC MIVEC eninge
    Honda Civic with B18C (1.8L DOHC VTEC)
    if both are tuned and modified to similar levels
    wtf is a 1.8 mivec
    no such thing
    mitsu only made 1.6 mivec
    1.6 mivec vs 1.6 vtec
    mivec had more power, much better on the dyno and more reliable
    tappets problem also happens with hondas aswell
    jus not as loud as the mitsus
    Last edited by V8_Hero; 03-06-2005 at 06:51 PM.

  7. #31
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    MELB CBD
    Car:
    EF9 SiR & CRV
    Quote Originally Posted by V8_Hero
    yeha but the thing with EJ20s, they are marketed way more than the 4g63s, that is why more people recognise it with the wrx than the evo.
    that's another different issue though.. that's marketing.

    those who actually have done the testing have done the testing specifically towards the two engines.

    there are pros and cons as i said with both.. however in the end, from first gen to current
    comparing EJ20 and 4G63.. check the reviews and results.
    if i can find that full documentary i'll post it up here.....

    this debate will always be about "biase" as people each have their own interpretation.

    hopefully people will see statistics and results over their own opinion.

    Quote Originally Posted by V8_Hero
    mivec had more power, much better on the dyno and more reliable
    tappets problem also happens with hondas aswell
    jus not as load as the mitsus
    yeah problem with hondas as well.. as with any car..
    however as i said, it's been a reported problem for many generations now.
    still an issue.. and as you said "not as load as the mitsus".. (I assume that you mean lot)
    so yeah i get what you mean..
    but then therefore that conclusion leads back to the initial topic.
    i believe vtec engines would perform better over the mivec due to more improvements with their engines.
    the results have shown they have been more reliable in most aspects...
    Last edited by [R]; 03-06-2005 at 06:39 PM.
    [EXE Crew]
    JDM EF9 SiR

  8. #32
    Quote Originally Posted by [R]
    that's another different issue though.. that's marketing.

    those who actually have done the testing have done the testing specifically towards the two engines.

    there are pros and cons as i said with both.. however in the end, from first gen to current
    comparing EJ20 and 4G63.. check the reviews and results.
    if i can find that full documentary i'll post it up here.....

    this debate will always be about "biase" as people each have their own interpretation.

    hopefully people will see statistics and results over their own opinion.
    well from what i have seen with earlier rexs, reliability factor aint great. It really depends on what the person likes. sure the rex burble might sound great but i get sick of it. Evo has handling, the engine is quite strong but crank shafts are weak when it comes to chasing big power. Personally i would rather an EVO. They are so much rarer here and you get the variants like Fq400 etc even tho they are jus pretty much aftermarket modified evos on warranty

  9. #33
    if SUburu was game they would compete and make rexs come with aftermarket parts and still have the car under warranty but they wont do that cos they kno there will be problems.

  10. #34
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Perth WA
    Car:
    EK1 CXi
    Quote Originally Posted by V8_Hero
    wtf is a 1.8 mivec
    no such thing
    mitsu only made 1.6 mivec
    1.6 mivec vs 1.6 vtec
    mivec had more power, much better on the dyno and more reliable
    tappets problem also happens with hondas aswell
    jus not as load as the mitsus
    whoops lol
    its a 1.6L MIVEC
    and a 1.8L turbo
    MY BAD
    CXi POWER

  11. #35
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    melb, vic
    Car:
    civic
    Quote Originally Posted by V8_Hero
    wtf is a 1.8 mivec
    no such thing
    mitsu only made 1.6 mivec
    1.6 mivec vs 1.6 vtec
    mivec had more power, much better on the dyno and more reliable
    tappets problem also happens with hondas aswell
    jus not as load as the mitsus

    lol i was thinking to myself for a second aswell, when did mitsubishi make a 1.8mivec...
    i do remember reading somewhere that the 1.6 mivec was a better built engine compared to the 1.6 vtec. but the 1.8vtec (type r engine) was the best engine from honda. dont really think the k20a was as good as the b18c IMO. but yes, back to the topic, EJ20 engines arent as strong as the 4G63 and the SR20.

  12. #36
    what would be interesting is an evo with an ej20 and a rex with 4g63
    now that would be controversial

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.1.3


Terms and Conditions
Ozhonda.com is in no way affiliated with the Honda motor company or Honda Australia in anyway whatsoever.